AFL Player # 7: Indefatigable Zach Merrett (c) - 5 time Crichton Medallist! 🏅🏅🏅🏅🏅

Remove this Banner Ad

Massages the footy, Zach and Walla are the two best kicks of the footy I’ve seen in my time watching Essendon.

With AMT it comes from playing games of footy on basketball courts with hoops instead of goals but they just drop the thing on a dime with unbelievable regularity.
Agree with this and a certain former number 2 went alright as well (not Ricky Dyson although he had his moments)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Also interviewed today, but with ABC Sport, who are even worse with putting podcasts on platforms that I can embed on the forum 🤢

It's a video embed... of the entire show... here (starts 37:33):

 
His defence was outstanding. He is now a complete player under Scott.

To think we nearly lost him when he was dropped out of the leadership group for Daniher & Fantasia is criminal.

I think this is a bit like the Cale Hooker situation. He became a great player only after the club tried to trade him. Did he prove them wrong, or did he prove them right in that it was the catalyst for his turnaround? I like to think the latter. Not sure about Merrett being dropped from the leadership group but you can argue it both ways.
 
Last edited:
I think this is a bit like the Cale Hooker situation. He became a great player only after the club tried to trade him. Did he prove them wrong, or did he prove them right in that it was the catalyst for his turnaround? I like to think the latter. Not sure about Merrett being dropped from the leadership group but you can argue it both ways.
He's spoken about it a bit... in one way he did change what he does to connect more with his teammates, but he also doubled down in other ways and much of the playing group around him was turned over, becoming a group that appreciates his style of demanding high standard leadership
 
I know a lot of people/fans don’t care about it, but he’d be top 10 in the Brownlow voting at the moment, possibly top 5.

If not for a textbook tackle :)drunk:), he’d be half a chance.
 
He's spoken about it a bit... in one way he did change what he does to connect more with his teammates, but he also doubled down in other ways and much of the playing group around him was turned over, becoming a group that appreciates his style of demanding high standard leadership

Yep, saw that interview. I guess not being in the inner sanctum we don’t know if he changed the things he was dropped for and the other stuff was relevant or not. For all we know it may’ve been they didn’t mind what he was saying but how he was saying it. If that’s the case and he simply adapted his delivery then you could say dropping him was the right call. Who knows.

Anyway he’s playing so well right now and seems to be captaining great.
 
Cant find the post but posted when I first heard the news of Zac being named captain that he would be absolutely brilliant for the footy club.

He will drive standards whilst not being called into line, he is the one drawing the line and seems to have taken it like a duck to water.

We have needed someone to drive standards and he is doing just this. Love it


I say it every week but would be one of the most under rated players in the comp.
 
Also interviewed today, but with ABC Sport, who are even worse with putting podcasts on platforms that I can embed on the forum 🤢

It's a video embed... of the entire show... here (starts 37:33):

just listened to this and I don't mind the idea of Dreamtime being a complete standalone game. Would bring the whole AFL world together which would be a brilliant spectacle
 
Zach Merrett might lose a Brownlow this year if he keeps this form up. 1996 Corey McKernan style.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Does anyone think the Brownlow rule thing about suspension is wrong? Surely having being suspended for a week or more is the deserved disadvantage? If you win it, when you've been out for a couple of weeks you're even more deserving.
Not really, it’s for the best and fairest and getting suspended probably rules out the latter
 
Brownlow is overrated anyway.

Like, it’s put on a pedestal due to…tradition?
It’s one award voted on by the umpires.
There’s the same award, but voted by coaches. Gets…well not zero attention, but considerably less.

Not saying one is more deserving/worth more than the other but - outside of tradition, there’s no real logic as to why the Brownlow is “the” award.
 
Not really, it’s for the best and fairest and getting suspended probably rules out the latter

It used to be that you’d get suspended for knocking someone’s head off and not much else.

These days, you get suspended if your tackling technique is marginally dangerous.

Might we worth looking at the grading.
 
Last edited:
Brownlow is overrated anyway.

Like, it’s put on a pedestal due to…tradition?
It’s one award voted on by the umpires.
There’s the same award, but voted by coaches. Gets…well not zero attention, but considerably less.

Not saying one is more deserving/worth more than the other but - outside of tradition, there’s no real logic as to why the Brownlow is “the” award.
I wonder which one means more to the players?
 
Does anyone think the Brownlow rule thing about suspension is wrong? Surely having being suspended for a week or more is the deserved disadvantage? If you win it, when you've been out for a couple of weeks you're even more deserving.
My issue with the Brownlow is that getting suspended for a week doesn’t make you an unfair player. I reckon they need to redefine the threshold for ‘fairest’. Maybe a 3 week suspension should rule you ineligible?
 
Brownlow is overrated anyway.

Like, it’s put on a pedestal due to…tradition?
It’s one award voted on by the umpires.
There’s the same award, but voted by coaches. Gets…well not zero attention, but considerably less.

Not saying one is more deserving/worth more than the other but - outside of tradition, there’s no real logic as to why the Brownlow is “the” award.
It’s voted by the umpires but awarded by the league, whereas the other one you speak of is awarded by a third party (the coaches’ union)
 
My issue with the Brownlow is that getting suspended for a week doesn’t make you an unfair player. I reckon they need to redefine the threshold for ‘fairest’. Maybe a 3 week suspension should rule you ineligible?
I think even a fine-only offence can make you unfair, if it’s for unsportsmanlike conduct, trying to win an unfair advantage (ducking/diving) or non-football acts, sticking your finger up at the crowd or something.

Conversely they seem to give suspensions away like they’re lollies lately.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player # 7: Indefatigable Zach Merrett (c) - 5 time Crichton Medallist! 🏅🏅🏅🏅🏅

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top