It really depends which Warne you get. When he's in England commentating on Sky he is professional and his analysis is pretty good. When he is in Australia he cranks up the blokeiness and becomes a bit of a knob.Why the hate for Warne?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It really depends which Warne you get. When he's in England commentating on Sky he is professional and his analysis is pretty good. When he is in Australia he cranks up the blokeiness and becomes a bit of a knob.Why the hate for Warne?
Why the hate for Warne?
I reckon he is elite to listen to. Knows cricket better than almost everyone else ive heard speak about it. Acknowledge he is a little lazy in his preparation in terms of analysis of shield / test cricket outside that of the big 3 but there are others who cover that and his ability to identify trends in game or weaknesses in technique are unparalleled by anyone not named Ponting.
I find seven really ordinary outside of Ponting but even for him its too much to carry when compared to the overall package on Fox.
This as well, they obviously tend to reign in the rubbish aspects of his commentary over there and he is far better.It really depends which Warne you get. When he's in England commentating on Sky he is professional and his analysis is pretty good. When he is in Australia he cranks up the blokeiness and becomes a bit of a knob.
So…he’s a BigFooty poster?Thats just bullshit, warne comes into each summer with pre conceived ideas of who deserves to be dropped and who deserves their spot he then ignores what actually happens in the matches in front of him so he can continue to push the blokes who he rates and hammer the ones he hates while his fellow commentators either cringe or try and change the subject or once in a while like with mark waugh actually call him out on his bullshit.
He's a pompous boob who uses his position to push agenda's, which are usually talking down or up players based on his real life interaction with them
He really doesn't have any of those qualities.
Thats just bullshit, warne comes into each summer with pre conceived ideas of who deserves to be dropped and who deserves their spot he then ignores what actually happens in the matches in front of him so he can continue to push the blokes who he rates and hammer the ones he hates while his fellow commentators either cringe or try and change the subject or once in a while like with mark waugh actually call him out on his bullshit.
Warne of course has a wealth knowledge but he talks way, way too much sh*te and he has fantastically biased opinions on players.
When it comes to Starc, Warne sounded more like one of us bitching about our pet peeve than a man who's taken over 700 test wickets.Does he actually?
Starc being dropped isn't a controversial opinion. Fairly commonly held. He got a wicket first ball but was otherwise fairly underwhelming in my opinion for the match
When it comes to Starc, Warne sounded more like one of us bitching about our pet peeve than a man who's taken over 700 test wickets.
You've got that backwards, I'm certain you're listening to someone else.You must be watching someone else or you cant get over your Warne offended
You've got that backwards, I'm certain you're listening to someone else.
Warne is the epitome of great players don't always make great analysts.
He's crickets version of Magic Johnson except Magic isn't a twat.
He's not.Lol at saying Warne isnt a great analyst
A pink ball Test at the G would've been amazing but it had to be Tasmania.I'm still a bit bewildered by Warne's graceless rant when Hobart got the last Ashes test, I mean too bad if you were happy to see an Ashes finally come to Tassie, instead you had to listen to Warne go on and on about how you can get more people into the MCG as if that's the be all and end all. Let's face it, it all came down to the fact that it was personally more convenient for him if it was in Melbourne and he didn't get his own way so had a big sook.
Maxwell:
Munro, Marsh, Philippe: *crickets*
Philippe was in the same game, for the winning side. That's the whole problem with Warne a a commentator, he can't give praise where it's due when it is not one of his guys.Sounds like offended. Maybe he was watching the stars game (given he played for them) and not the others
Philippe was in the same game, for the winning side. That's the whole problem with Warne a a commentator, he can't give praise where it's due when it is not one of his guys.
Philippe is "one of his guys" though.Philippe was in the same game, for the winning side. That's the whole problem with Warne a a commentator, he can't give praise where it's due when it is not one of his guys.
Praising one player doesn't diminish the performance of others