dlanod
Moderator
- Sep 14, 2006
- 54,185
- 86,668
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- GWS; CCMariners; NQCowboys; Ravens
- Moderator
- #5,801
Yeah, the exit poll that's the only source for the Native American claim was a NBC/CNN one so it makes sense that's where you saw it.I actually heard it on CNN of all places the day after the election and a leftist academic was explaining that the Dems had completely ignored the needs of native Americans in the two particular states that he was talking about , and that they were living in complete poverty with very limited access to medical requirements etc. resulting in native Americans registering a protest vote (his reading of it ) and giving Trump the most support of any demographic in those states where native Americans were most prevalent.
So yes I haven't looked at across the board numbers and it was very surprising to me.
Digging more into their numbers per some of those other links, their Native American "representation" were very split towards self-identified city dwellers from states without a substantial Native American population.
Electorates where there was a substantial population of Native Americans were still won by Democrats but on significantly narrower margins, and polls explicitly verifying the results by surveying a large number of Native Americans show a range from a small Democrat majority or roughly on par with the American vote as a whole (1% margin towards Trump). Nothing within spitting distance of the 65%-35% split the exit poll reported.