But he didn't, hence why it was a weak point.He may as well have done, after all, he relied on another book that is nearly an as audacious work of pure fantasy as the Bible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
But he didn't, hence why it was a weak point.He may as well have done, after all, he relied on another book that is nearly an as audacious work of pure fantasy as the Bible.
You really think that is an argument for global warming? That's just embarrassing.
But he didn't, hence why it was a weak point.
In your dreams
The purpose of the list is to provide a resource for the skeptical arguments being made in peer-reviewed journals and to demonstrate the existence of these papers. It is not supposed to be a single argument but rather a resource for all of them.
I am a computer scientist but I will provide you with some skeptical scientists you can refer to,Wow. A real life Blog Scientist! Awesome! Is it true you guys wear your underwear on the outside?
Again - my reply has just a little more meaning that this post - seriously forum posts this long are complete shyte.I am a computer scientist but I will provide you with some skeptical scientists you can refer to,
I apologize there are just so many skeptical scientists,Again - my reply has just a little more meaning that this post - seriously forum posts this long are complete shyte.
Better.I apologize there are just so many skeptical scientists,
31,478 Scientists Reject 'Global Warming' Alarm (Petition Project)
No it's not a "strong" indicator by itself - you don't measure global climate in short periods of time.No, but the fact that the last four decades have been consecutively warmer is a rather strong indication of global warming. The last decade certainly puts to rest the "no warming since X year" meme once and for all.
Some charts and data similar to already posted. He may or may not be wrong, but it has nothing to do with using the Bible as a source - he was simply using "Jesus was a boy" as a dating point.So what is his source for it being warmer in Jesus day than today?
Nope. Not even close.
Real bloggers? Fake bloggers? Your losing it. Is this because your religious beliefs lie in tatters debunked by scientists that use the Scientific Method? You need help.And here's a chart that shows how Blog Science is done, not that discredited laboratory science, with its corrected data and hidden inclines, no we're talking about science for the REAL world, done by REAL bloggers.
You're up to speed. Great. Here's a bumper sticker for you.Yes, because the UN is taking over the world to install a Communist One World State. I know all about that one, Christopher Monckton told me all about it.
Epic straw man fail.Because bloggers are educators. Maybe we should do what they are doing in Texas, we should get the bloggers to write the school textbooks that perpetuate this lie that scientists are putting out there. We could have all textbooks vetted publicly on a blog. We would democratise science rather then letting all of these "experts" fill our children's minds with all of these so-called "facts", and hamstringing Citizen Scientists with all this "scientific method" ("they call it peer-review, we call it Stalin-esque censorship!"). We can report and let out kids decide! We truly would usher in a new post-Enlightenment Utopia, were can run around naked and free, unbridled of concerns like qualifications and stifling titles like doctorates. After all, anyone on the net can call themselves a scientist these days!
I found this thread because I monitor any links to the list to see if any incompetents (such as shiznit) will fail to read the notes following it (they always do) and embarrassingly just try to use Google to discredit it. It is sad but it happens enough that I have to wind up posting what they failed to read. The list has never been debunked. The sheer volume of peer-reviewed papers supporting skeptics arguments is so overwhelming they usually wind up resorting to out right lying like Greenfyre. The lies usually involve one or a combination of the following,Welcome aboard Poptech. I'm a fan of your list and have used it many times in the past along with Roger Pielke Jr.'s work debunking the peer review argument the global propagandists often rely on. BTW, how did you find out about this thread?
Yes there has been a mild warming since the LIA, a mild cooling since 1998 and no statistically significant warming in the last 15 years. All in tenths of a degree.You could always just look at temperature records over the past century or 2 and note that global warming is indeed occurring.
Apparently your “debunking” did not work out so well. You can challenge anything I stated and I will be glad to correct you with the facts.Poptart is an absolute psycho. Apparently he’s written some code to stalk out every time this link is used so he can jackboot his way over all debate
He’s cyberstalking you Greenfyre’s! What a deviant.
Agreed. And if I find something significant, I'll let you know.For people who claim to be so "intellectual" it is amazing how intellectually dishonest they actually are. If you run across any not addressed in the notes, let me know and I will add whatever is needed.
Just an update on grin. He has a habit of comparing ipcc global warming sceptics to the tobacco industry (which a certain al gore received a lot of money from and his family made their fortune from) and making unfounded claims without backing up his posts with any references. Don't get too sucked in replying to his stuff as it's been debunked in other threads and you will be wasting valuable time.Yes there has been a mild warming since the LIA, a mild cooling since 1998 and no statistically significant warming in the last 15 years. All in tenths of a degree.
Increased temperatures alone over such a short period is not by itself evidence of global climate change - it's not rocket science, but it is climate science, and your assertion is bad science. Temperatures do increase and decrease naturally. There are other important factors, such as rate of change. So your question added in the edit is the important thing, that too many people do not focus on.You could always just look at temperature records over the past century or 2 and note that global warming is indeed occurring.
It's really not rocket science guys.
(Edit)
The question is: Why? Could carbon be contributing?
So whats causing the current warming then?Increased temperatures alone over such a short period is not by itself evidence of global climate change - it's not rocket science, but it is climate science, and your assertion is bad science. Temperatures do increase and decrease naturally. There are other important factors, such as rate of change. So your question added in the edit is the important thing, that too many people do not focus on.
So whats causing the current warming then?
What is pointless is the way zealots approach the important issue of global climate change. This thread has seen a classic combination of the zealotry in GCC combined with the extreme idiocy of BF whereby anyone who disagrees with anything at all you say must be definition be taking the extreme opposite view to you.It get's a bit pointless arguing with this mob.
They will argue against global warming with the passion of a fundy arguing that the world was created in a week 6 or 7 thousand years ago. No amount of evidence will sway them. It's a faith thing.
as sad as it is pathetic.
Yes there has been a mild warming since the LIA, a mild cooling since 1998 and no statistically significant warming in the last 15 years. All in tenths of a degree.