Just a gut feeling.Out of interest, where does this "belief" come from?
I'm not suggesting that we definitely wouldn't spend 3rd round picks on Martyn or Coleman, but as you've said it's very early days.
I like both of these boys and think we're a good chance to take both of them, right now I couldn't see us matching second round picks for them but don't think we'll have to make those decisions anyway.
And I'd take Cumberland over Reville if it came down to a choice between the two, Reville might need to do an extra year in the Academy like Keidean to be draft-ready.
I thought it last year after the trade period, and again during the draft when we traded out the future fourth round pick for the pick that we used to draft Answerth, but kept both third round picks.
I didn't believe there were particular kids earmarked at the time, even though this years academy kids have been spoken about a little since their U16 year. Just that if we had one or two academy kids rated high enough, we have the picks to match the bids, or pick the kids outright.
I'll be a little disappointed if an opposition team bids on one of our academy kids before our current first three picks. After our current first three picks, I don't believe it matters if the bids come in the late second or early third round.
I'm not sure where Martyn and Coleman sit amongst this years draftees. I know one of the main draft watchers rates Martyn as a potential top 30 prospect. Last year one of the draft watchers compared Martyn to SA's U18 captain Luke Valente, who went pick 32 last year.
This years draft, in terms of the first two rounds, is not too dissimilar to last years draft, just not as many elite talents at the top end, from discussions on the draft board. However current discussions are that it's not looking as deep after the first two rounds.
Looking at last years draft, small forwards who are somewhat similar to Coleman were picked in the late second round, Irving Mosquito at pick 38 and Jarrod Cameron at pick 39.