Recruiting AFL Draft Watch 2022 - Tsatas, Hayes, Davey x2, Munkara & Montgomerie

[eDPS]

Quick links: Player Contract Status | Trade & Free Agency 2022 | JHA Father/Son and NGA | Adrian Dodoro

Spoiler: LIVE DRAFT ORDER (2022 Draft Order)

Spoiler: FUTURE PICK TRACKER (2023 Draft Order)

Spoiler: Value to match

2022 Draft Guide AFL

Get the 2022 AFL Draft Guide Fill out your details below to access the Draft Guide Please Note: If you have previously completed the above form, lost access to the draft guide and would like to view it again please check your email for a direct link. Features Each profile includes vitals...

central.rookieme.com

 

[The Prosecutor]

They don't have 19, they traded it for CCJ.

I wouldn't be giving anything back with JHF anyway. Adelaide offered 2021 pick 4, 2022 pick 3 (aside stands), 2022 Pick 17 (Melb) for JHF and 19.

17 and 18 cancel each other out. If Adelaide want JHF straight up they can give 3 and a 2023 1st, which is essentially what they offered last year.

Was using 19 under the assumption thats where a PP would land.

 

[doug85]

He's contracted, an SA local, a position of need for Adelaide and the number 1 pick less than 10 months ago.

Not to mention Adelaide offered that deal 12 months ago essentially. Norf being a dumpster fire won't affect his value Adelaide will back in the fact he is gonna be happy back home and see his performances improve.

Maybe add McAsey to the deal for a future 3rd or something as Norf need KPF players as a flyer.

I’m providing my opinion on what I think is fair value, I don’t actually think norf accept just pick 3. I will say that the fact he’s a previous pick 1 is a sunk cost and shouldn’t be a factor (it will be). Adelaide’s previous offer shouldn’t be relevant, however his form and behaviour should be.

Norf might be smarter to accept a high offer this year if they reckon he’s out the door in 2023 as they’ll have far less leverage and if his unhappy his form may dwindle.

 

[Red Black and Blue]

No way should they trade JHF, would be like Melbourne trading Petracca after one year. You hold on for dear life and hope he builds stronger relationships with the club in the next 12 months.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

4 & 6 on Cadman and Busslinger and then have 3 top 8~ picks next year to smash that draft crop which is looking promising.

If there's crop on the draft it's ready for smashing

 

[ILikeCheese]

Interesting considering how many talls we have on the list currently Cal Twomey thinks if Cadmans still on the board at our pick we just have to draft him?
Admittedly he thinks he’ll be gone by then though.

 

[citizen-erased]

They don't have 19, they traded it for CCJ.

I wouldn't be giving anything back with JHF anyway. Adelaide offered 2021 pick 4, 2022 pick 3 (aside stands), 2022 Pick 17 (Melb) for JHF and 19.

17 and 18 cancel each other out. If Adelaide want JHF straight up they can give 3 and a 2023 1st, which is essentially what they offered last year.

reckon the crows are counting their blessings that was turned down now.

 

[Yoda_]

Interesting considering how many talls we have on the list currently Cal Twomey thinks if Cadmans still on the board at our pick we just have to draft him?
Admittedly he thinks he’ll be gone by then though.

Why wouldn't we draft a natural, highly talented key forward? It's one of our most pressing needs despite the who ha on an NGA kid currently playing in defence, a 20 year old, who despite showing reasonable signs is still very speculative and a 28 year what feels like journeyman who has just returned.

Ive been a big big advocate of a key forward. I know the popular opinion is to back in what we have but what if Baldwin doesn't make it? We'll have kept a then 29 year old Stewart, a not making it Baldwin and a year old Wright with Jones also likely but no depth developing

 

[andleanback]

reckon the crows are counting their blessings that was turned down now.

Why? They’ll have to end up paying a premium if they go after him at the end of next year. Talented pick 1s hold their value.

 

[citizen-erased]

Why? They’ll have to end up paying a premium if they go after him at the end of next year. Talented pick 1s hold their value.

im not sure JHF still lands a gun like Rachele, plus a top 3 pick.

 

[MarkJohnson#1]

Not much talk about Phillipou for us. Is he not the type we are desperately crying out for?

 

[andleanback]

im not sure JHF still lands a gun like Rachele, plus a top 3 pick.

Well it wouldn’t be a top 3 pick, we haven’t seen close to JHF best talents this year, mainly due to him being a north Melbourne. He’s going to be a generational player believe that, I’d still take JHF over Rachele and whatever pick Adelaide end up with this year (likely 4-5).

 

[brownezaka]

Not much talk about Phillipou for us. Is he not the type we are desperately crying out for?

Would be stoked to grab phillipou, he has the potential to be a bontompelli type of player or at worst Langford.

Feel as though Adelaide will take him at pick 4, and even if they didn’t I don’t have confidence that dodoro will take him over a cadman/Clarke/McKenzie.

 

[andleanback]

Would be stoked to grab phillipou, he has the potential to be a bontompelli type of player or at worst Langford.

Feel as though Adelaide will take him at pick 4, and even if they didn’t I don’t have confidence that dodoro will take him over a cadman/Clarke/McKenzie.

I’d say clark wouldn’t be high on our board over other options. A 180cm mid wouldn’t be part of our planning after taking Hobbs last year.

 

[Harlequin Dream]

I’d say clark wouldn’t be high on our board over other options. A 180cm mid wouldn’t be part of our planning after taking Hobbs last year.

I hope you are right.

 

[brownezaka]

I’d say clark wouldn’t be high on our board over other options. A 180cm mid wouldn’t be part of our planning after taking Hobbs last year.

As much as I hope you’re right, I can see his leadership qualities and relentless pressure at the ball being a huge temptation for dodoro to take him.
When you listen to all player interviews they constantly say that is the what Essendon wants to pride themselves on so wouldn’t it make sense to draft someone that has made a name for himself playing the same style that we want to play?
After all did we really need a Hobbs type of player with our first pick last year? But we still took him anyway (I’m not upset about it).

 

[Zach Package]

Given Ashcroft has officially nominated Brisbane it’s now time to work on a mutually beneficial deal to get them more points and for us to improve our position.

 

[Corleone]

Lions' HUGE draft boost: No.1 contender opts into father-son rule

Potential No.1 draft pick Will Ashcroft has nominated for Brisbane as a father-son selection

www.afl.com.au

Ashcroft has nominated to go to Brisbane via F/S - Wonder if North will bid on him at Pick 1 regardless?

 

[faible]

Lions' HUGE draft boost: No.1 contender opts into father-son rule

Potential No.1 draft pick Will Ashcroft has nominated for Brisbane as a father-son selection

www.afl.com.au

Ashcroft has nominated to go to Brisbane via F/S - Wonder if North will bid on him at Pick 1 regardless?

They should, why give Brisbane a freebie if Ashcroft is clearly the best player in the draft?

 

[Corleone]

They should, why give Brisbane a freebie if Ashcroft is clearly the best player in the draft?

Oh I agree they should, however there was a lot of talk around JHF/Daicos last year and the overarching theme of those conversations were that North wanted the prestige of having "the number one pick" instead of making Collingwood pay top dollar. This was largely due to last year was the first time ever that they had the number one pick.

Given this is now their second "No. 1" pick I wonder if that'll be a factor this year or whether they'll actually bid on Ashcroft or not.

 

[TheGrizz]

Given Ashcroft has officially nominated Brisbane it’s now time to work on a mutually beneficial deal to get them more points and for us to improve our position.

That Brisbane pick is going to be a hotly contested commodity.

They are likely going to get a pretty good deal there.

 

[TheGrizz]

Oh I agree they should, however there was a lot of talk around JHF/Daicos last year and the overarching theme of those conversations were that North wanted the prestige of having "the number one pick" instead of making Collingwood pay top dollar. This was largely due to last year was the first time ever that they had the number one pick.

Given this is now their second "No. 1" pick I wonder if that'll be a factor this year or whether they'll actually bid on Ashcroft or not.

They can also bid for Ashcroft at 1 and take whoever they want at 2 (Sheezel, Cadman, whoever) without being accused of reaching with the first overall pick.

 

[faible]

Oh I agree they should, however there was a lot of talk around JHF/Daicos last year and the overarching theme of those conversations were that North wanted the prestige of having "the number one pick" instead of making Collingwood pay top dollar. This was largely due to last year was the first time ever that they had the number one pick.

Given this is now their second "No. 1" pick I wonder if that'll be a factor this year or whether they'll actually bid on Ashcroft or not.

I think it was less clear that Daicos was the best last year, enough so that taking JHF at #1 wasn't seen as a reach, plus the whole promo thing (which is BS anyway). This year it's Ashcroft then daylight, sounds like Wardlaw could have been a genuine contender but injuries curtailed that.

If I'm North I'd be bidding on Ashcroft and seeing whether I can turn #2 in to something more useful. Wardlaw at #2 doesn't really give them what they need, Sheezel might be more appealing, then any of the KPPs would be a reach at #2, so would someone with a pick inside the Top-10 be keen to slide up the board?

 

[Old Campaigner]

There's a school of thought that being picked at #1 places a lot of pressure on a young player and it's better to give that mantle to someone else if you can (i.e. the Crows bidding on JUH knowing it'd be matched)

 

[TheGrizz]

Bigfooty Draft expert PMBangers joins the Bombercast to discuss all things draft including:

• how this draft and its top 10 is shaping up
• Latest on Alwyn Davey
  Multiple players found. Use birthday to differentiate. eg [PLAYERCARD="23/11/1962"]Joe Smith[/PLAYERCARD]
• Who suits Essendon's needs with Essendons first two picks
• Your submitted Q's (Munkara, trading future picks and more!)

Podcast - 2022 BigFooty Bombercast - Special Edition III - Merry Christmas to us?

TheGrizz and boncer34 ride out on their sleigh for a bumper festive edition of the Bombercast. They cast an eye over our draft results, chat about what the team might look like next year and beyond and ruminate over the 2023 fixture. Like and subscribe!

www.bigfooty.com

 

[foj1]

I feel strongly that Adelaide should lose draft picks for bringing the game into disrepute. I would hope essendon ask the question of the afl as I still feel it is an injustice how our club was treated on very flimsy evidence.
it would also make our first round pick more valuable and prohibit Adelaide from having the draft capital for trading!