This reminds of one of the reasons why I'm afraid of no one finding the positives of Live 2
AFL Wii had probably the best camera of any AFL game ever (one where you could see downfield ahead of you without the quick turn of the camera when the ball changed hands)
We get to Live 2 and the default camera is side on like Live 1 and even though the Wii camera is in the game (I'm pretty sure) WW felt the need to change the default to try and replicate Live 1
If WW read these opinions that are all positive for Live 1 then we'll end up with a game that isn't the best possible game it's just a Live 1 replica faults and all
So as you say, WW should have their own vision no doubt and perhaps take on board the positive gameplay aspects of Live 1. I found Live 2 to be very one dimensional in terms of gameplay variations. Only one style of marking, just not a lot of depth. I'm sure they can improve on that for this newie..it would surely be a talking point for them.