- Banned
- #76
Seems this was missed by the masses.
It's great that the nrl isn't being sucked into this gratuitous self promotion .
not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Seems this was missed by the masses.
i think "the more victards that burn the better" is about all anyone needs to know about El Dogblolol no and I won't be expanding on that comment short of saying inknow more about him than most on here
Of which I acknowledged .
There you go again attributing statements to me that I haven't made .
The truth is you mitigated these low lives by saying they were just "w***ers" and that there was a justifiable comparison with bay13 .
I would expect more from a mod .
.
i think "the more victards that burn the better" is about all anyone needs to know about El Dogblo
its the sort of comment that should get you banned from a forum for life, total-package style. the fact that he is a mod reflects on the board
Why hasn't a mod removed all this trash between NRL and AFL. Who cares who donated what, the fact is both contributed and have put money towards helping people get their lives back on track and its good to see. It's not self promotion, it's nothing to do with the name or the image, it's simply donating money and hoping trying to encourage others to donate. Every bit helps and its good of them to contribute.
Besides the fact that this is a poor attempt to cover the fact you posted something silly.....
You do realize you have followed this up with a sledge toward the NRL???
Comments like "the more victards that burn the better" is not about silliness or being a w***er .
It's about unconditional banning .fullstop . end of debate .
It was a comment directed at those people not the nrl .
.
from what i read of mels review el d was copping a blasting for a way OTT comment that had been removed. mel?Firstly, is there any evidence eld actually said that? AM has recently reviewed the thread in question and stated he found no such comment.
cos789 said:The truth is you mitigated these low lives by saying they were just "w***ers" and that there was a justifiable comparison with bay13 .
AuckMel said:If any Rugby league fan is turned off Aussie Rules because of Bay 13 or any poster here then they need their heads read. An insult on Bay 13 is being called a bumsniffer or having the games International status questioned, while a pot shot here might make reference to you being a bit slow on the uptake just because you follow Rugby league.
meltiger said:According to Auckmel that precise comment was not made.
zero said:from what i read of mels review el d was copping a blasting for a way OTT comment that had been removed. mel?
zero said:and plogs has a recollection of it being "let the victards burn", one which pissed him off enough to sign up and respond.
and be honest here, tell me that doesent sound like something el d would say
Can you not see how it can be taken as a sledge toward the NRL?
No I cannot . It was a sarcastic remark against those attacking the AFL .
If it can - so be it . I think the nrl can look after itself .
I'm not obliged to say nice things about the the nrl .
I wish the nrl would go away so we could just talk about football but fans of the nrl insist about talking other than football .
Unfortunately you're going to prolong the discussion .
.
Firstly, is there any evidence eld actually said that? AM has recently reviewed the thread in question and stated he found no such comment. My recollection was of arguing with Him about having a lack of sympathy. I stand by that even though i understand some of the background into such an attitude. I certainly don't remember the sort of comment being made that is being referred too.
Secondly. Re read that post if yours. Can you not see how it can be taken as a sledge toward the NRL?
Could have sworn this thread was about donations to flood victims not about competing nrl/afl forums fellas, which next the the flood isn't even a blip on the radar, seriously boys, you are doing more bad than good with your bickering
from what i read of mels review el d was copping a blasting for a way OTT comment that had been removed. mel?
and plogs has a recollection of it being "let the victards burn", one which pissed him off enough to sign up and respond.
and be honest here, tell me that doesent sound like something el d would say
No I cannot . It was a sarcastic remark against those attacking the AFL .
If it can - so be it . I think the nrl can look after itself .
I'm not obliged to say nice things about the the nrl .
I wish the nrl would go away so we could just talk about football but fans of the nrl insist about talking other than football .
Unfortunately you're going to prolong the discussion
It was the mod being reffered too & as i said, the comments were deleted. My a/c name is not Plogs there either. I'd post the link but i don't know if that's allowed and besides, we are probably done with this. One correction on my behalf though, it appears i didn't register at that point but earlier.
Cheers.
Twice now you've alluded to some 'mental state' El Dildo has mysteriously acquired that drives him to:
(A) Keep a well-resourced backlog of every AFL-related off-field 'incident' from about ... 1858;
(B) Post with glee any of the above;
(C) Almost always the first in to link an AFL friendly piece chiefly to denounce the author's hypocrisy/collusion;
(D) Use the most juvenile terms* for AFL people, i.e. Khalid Shady (Sheeds), Andpoo Dimwitrieww, Tablett (GA jnr), Victard, Victardia, GayFL; BigPoofy (I kid you not!) ... ;
(E) Insult anyone with a speck of AFL friendliness;
To the AFL fans who have the misfortune of visiting LeagueUnlimited, your mate El Dildo is the public face of LU/NRL on-line forum.
Did someone once force a Sherrin up his arse? I'm calling BS on your claims.
* I like to call him El Dildo just because...
Could have sworn this thread was about donations to flood victims not about competing nrl/afl forums fellas, which next the the flood isn't even a blip on the radar, seriously boys, you are doing more bad than good with your bickering
meltiger said:Whilst I don't agree with the way he posts, and have for many years argued with him and the others (Not in any serious way mind you, I gave up long ago trying to get some of them to be sensible), he is firstly entitled to his opinion, and secondly .... Replace every instance of the word "AFL" in your little rant above with "NRL" and you would have a distinctly accurate description of the criminals in the Victorian media
Anyone with an ounce of objectivity and credibility can see that there is no AFL fan with the same pathological hatred for NRL as your mate El Dildo has for AFL, not even close.
And, criminals in the Victorian media? Now it's clear you're of a similar mind-set to your fellow LU travellers. Good luck!
It's not just RL mind you. The Herald Scum ran a campaign against the world cup bud based on lies - the MCG re configuration that had been ruled out months earlier for example.
Back on my phone do quoting is hard
Para 1 - haha there are plenty of the same type if twits on here. Do nit kid yourself.
Para 2 - yes, having a northern state background which means I'm not blinkered by a cheer girl mentality like the rest if you, means I can look ST the media treatment of AFL players in comparison to NRL players in a much more honest fashion. Cuz and Fevola aside, the media treatment of the two sports is chalk and cheese.