AFL R12

[Willzzz]

Jeez, I know Selwood kicked the winning goal, but he was pretty much unsighted for the rest of the game, did not deserve 121 SC Points.

 

[Willzzz]

Looks like the line was a fair few goals too big for the Carlton like I predicted.
Heart-breaking for the Blues, really should have won that game.

 

[Anzac16]

1U - Steve Johnson Under 29.5 Possessions @ $1.87 (Sportsbet)

Well was on the money with this tonight.....

RTD 1-0-0, +.87U

 

[GROTTO]

Fairly comfortable in the end for the Cats.

 

[GROTTO]

News circulating today about Fyfe and Tex both carrying injuries and could be potential late outs.

 

[Sketi]

I heart Joel Selwood

 

[Anzac16]

I hate Joel Selwood

FTFY

 

[GROTTO]

Looks like the line was a fair few goals too big for the Carlton like I predicted.
Heart-breaking for the Blues, really should have won that game.

Were you tempted to back Carlton HH?

 

[Willzzz]

Were you tempted to back Carlton HH?

I did.
I had 0.25U - Carlton/Carlton HT/FT @ $7.50.
It was a toss-up between that and 0.5U Carlton SU @ $5.15, so I guess you can say I was somewhat 'happy' Carlton didn't win.
That was offset by seeing Selwood scoring 121SC Points though

 

[TheKanga]

Geelong 1-39 - 2.8u @ 2.10

- WIN

 

[GROTTO]

I did.
I had 0.25U - Carlton/Carlton HT/FT @ $7.50.
It was a toss-up between that and 0.5U Carlton SU @ $5.15, so I guess you can say I was somewhat 'happy' Carlton didn't win.
That was offset by seeing Selwood scoring 121SC Points though

Well done on the lines too, very nice work. Too scared to take the Blues at that line, I wanted more and I took more.

When Carlton won a game this season they were leading at HT in all of them, so the bet was sound.

 

[GROTTO]

- WIN

Hurts my eyes in the other colour!

Good win.

 

[GROTTO]

Fun Fact. Under Sando when Tex kicks 4 goals or more the Crows win 82% of the time.

Tex has achieved this in 11 games, winning 9 and losing 2 (by 10 and 5 points).

 

[Keystone agony]

Tailed all exactly.

Also added 2U Redden over Zorko SC @1.85
Also 1U Bird over Mcglynn @1.88 (Sportsbet) - Expecting Mcglynn to have his hands full tagging Ablett not sure if you score many SC points keeping a player out of the game. Bird has gone over 100 each of his alst 3 and is playing onball more and more

Id love to hear the reasoning as im a little concerned about them, however your last week record was impeccable - ill back you in

I hope this isnt going to be a bad week foxy_dal first time ive tailed and i havnt checked but from what i saw Gibbs was clear BOG and it hasnt started well.

Im still backing you in.

 

[foxy_dal]

I hope this isnt going to be a bad week foxy_dal first time ive tailed and i havnt checked but from what i saw Gibbs was clear BOG and it hasnt started well.

Im still backing you in.

Yeh bad start but can't win them all. Gibbs just too good tonight, Stokes did his bit but Simpson had a down night. Started off plenty of rounds with a bad Friday night actually so hopefully we are back in front by the Saints game where I have a few plays.

STANDBYHIRD12 the other one I was thinking about was hooker over Fletcher

 

[TheKanga]

Hurts my eyes in the other colour!

Good win.

Never in doubt

Good to see my suspicions of the line being to high for the Cats were correct.
Which is why i went with a 1-39 margin bet.

 

[Spads]

Jeez, I know Selwood kicked the winning goal, but he was pretty much unsighted for the rest of the game, did not deserve 121 SC Points.

Every time a player kicks a game winning goal it comes with whinging that their subjective supercoach score is scaled too high.

I'm not defending the scoring but it it subjective and has always been this way.

I personally don't mind the game defining moment created from a contested situation being rated highly accordingly.

 

[stewie griffen]

Solid call on the Carlton line willz

 

[chrisdon16]

Hawthorn/West Coast

Under 180.5

 

[happy punter]

Hawks -29.5. over Eagles @ 1.93 (2 units)
Hawks 40+ over Eagles @ 2.45 (1 unit)

 

[chrisdon16]

If it means anything to anyone, it's a perfect day in Launceston. No wind, blue sky, it's like summer. Hope this helps

 

[Willzzz]

Every time a player kicks a game winning goal it comes with whinging that their subjective supercoach score is scaled too high.

I'm not defending the scoring but it it subjective and has always been this way.

I personally don't mind the game defining moment created from a contested situation being rated highly accordingly.

Yes, the SC scoring system is different and they reward winning goals but you have to take each case separately and in this case, Selwood did not deserve 122 SC points.

How he only ended up 5 points less than Hawkins when Hawkins kicked 4 straight and set up another 2-3 more goals is beyond me.
Selwood might have kicked the last goal but besides that and the final quarter mark, he didn't do much else.

And the final goal came about through McLean's poor positioning and lack of defensive pressure at the stoppage.

 

[KardiniaPark]

Yes, the SC scoring system is different and they reward winning goals but you have to take each case separately and in this case, Selwood did not deserve 122 SC points.

How he only ended up 5 points less than Hawkins when Hawkins kicked 4 straight and set up another 2-3 more goals is beyond me.
Selwood might have kicked the last goal but besides that and the final quarter mark, he didn't do much else.

And the final goal came about through McLean's poor positioning and lack of defensive pressure at the stoppage.

He was 88 before he kicked that goal, he was very important at times without being brilliant.

 

[GROTTO]

Hawthorn/West Coast

Under 180.5

Is your reasoning because the Eagles scored so lowly last round and despite the conditions took the unders?
Losing Kennedy didn't help either? I have noticed big scores at this ground.

I think the line is about right, hard to call for me at least.

 

[chrisdon16]

Is your reasoning because the Eagles scored so lowly last round and despite the conditions took the unders?
Losing Kennedy didn't help either? I have noticed big scores at this ground.

I think the line is about right, hard to call for me at least.

Based on a lot of factors, don't really have time to explain...