grizzlym
Premium Platinum
And we reset again.
Keep it in here, please.
Keep it in here, please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Well we speculate what's going to happen more, ofcoarse!So what happens now?
probably a good thing!we seem to have lost the last 12 hours of posts from the last thread Griz?
haha maybe.probably a good thing!
I was waiting for you to respond to the latest information given your expertise between "clubs" and "players"Where are the lost posts from the end of the last thread?
I was educating people about their complete lack of understanding of the ACC/ASADA relationship.
On Friday, ASADA met officials from Essendon for the first time. It now seems that while the Australian Crime Commission had suspicions regarding certain individuals at Essendon, ASADA only moved to investigate the club after it reported itself to the AFL this week.
The Great Barry Besanko
If players signed a consent form and club. coaches and doctor and high performance guy all give signoff that substance A is approved by ASADA/WADA and a staff member then secretly swaps legal substance A with illegal substance B then I think there's grounds for sabotage.....and possible charges.
To illustrate the operation of article 10.5, an example where No Fault or Negligence would result in the total elimination of a sanction is where an Athlete could prove that, despite all due care, he or she was sabotaged by a competitor. Conversely, a sanction could not be completely eliminated on the basis of No Fault or Negligence in the following circumstances:
....
b) the administration of a prohibited substance by the Athlete's personal physician or trainer without disclosure to the Athlete (Athletes are responsible for their choice of medical personnel and for advising medical personnel that they cannot be given any prohibited substance)
...
however, depending on the unique facts of a particular case, any of the referenced illustrations could result in a reduced sanction based on No Significant Fault or Negligence.
Bugger I thought it was just me.we seem to have lost the last 12 hours of posts from the last thread Griz?
see ya mate. Let's see.Good luck Bombers. Night Lance. I wonder what the morning will bring?
They will turn out nutcases..Will read thread to grandchildren
I was waiting for you to respond to the latest information given your expertise between "clubs" and "players"
can you use this thread to expand on your previously stated theories?
You can put me down for Essendon being the P.17 Club.
people expressing shock at this report are the most naive people in the world. IF, but, maybe....Classic stuff. We have spent a year searching. Arrested no one. But we will. But do come forward.
It is an election year.
Dons injected. Injected lots. Cocktails perhaps. But not one iota will be proven illegal. Nor was anything done against players will (this is where the lawsuits will start). Caro has already started back peddling. Dank may be unethical in terms of boundaries pushed, non conventional substances and his relationship with crooks (through business) was the catalyst for the ACC going to the AFL/Essendon. HOWEVER, if he is proven innocent in regard to Essendon then Caro, Ralphy in particular (against will injections), Robbo better lube right up. Because this man is never working again.
Then comes the Essendon response.
I have gone from mortified and angry at the club. To reslient and disgusted at the media. The truth is coming now and those that revelled in this to sell papers will get it.
Club still must sack Robson, maybe Bomber and Robinson for bringing this maverick into the club.
Hird needs to step up.
I'll spell it out.How does this "thread" make any difference to my previous stated theories?
You can put me down for Essendon being the P.17 Club.