Upgrayedd
A Vote for Clive is a Vote for Justice
"Wah Wah players cant make set shots"
"HURRY HURRY PRESSURE FORGET YOUR ROUTINE!"
"HURRY HURRY PRESSURE FORGET YOUR ROUTINE!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Other sports have it it must be coolHow does the umpire keep in sync with the countdown clock?
Does he get a signal in his ear because that would just be a huge distraction from him watching what's going on.
Who thinks up this stuff? Nonsense rule ...
100% agree. As long as you start walking in before 30 seconds, you can take as long as you want to walk in. The rule should be (and I used to think it was) that after 30 seconds it's play on, regardless of whether they've started their run-up. It's not a good look for the game when someone (usually Saad) takes 50+ seconds before having their shot, especially if it were to happen late in a grand final.The rule is still broken with it still allowing for time wasting. Your team is slightly ahead with only a minute on the clock. Mark it just out side 50, tell the ump you are taking a shot. Then you get 20 odd seconds to go as far back as possible. You then just have to start a very slow walk in (Saad like). You could easily blow a minute or 2 off the clock. (Unless this counts as time off??)
Does it start before or after he throws the grass.
I find the AFL hard to take serious on any of there rules when they still allow a centre bounce.
How about the get the most obvious, basic and commonsense rules right first before they tackle trivial issues like countdown clocks.
So what will fans watch the player taking the set shot or the count down clock, you can't do both at the same time unless you're an extraterrestrial being. Which dumb campaigner thought this one up?
Now this guy here, he can multi task.
There are a lot of players who can kick that far so at the end of it why wouldnt they still have a shot? Still managing to waste a lot of timeJust telling the umpire your having a shot wouldn't stop them calling play on if they could tell you weren't having a shot. In fact, they usually are quite harsh on people outside 50 wasting time lining up...
They have totally lost track of the point of the bounce. It needs to return around the ground, and remove the whole 'only for ruckmen' thing too.
Call me ET once more and we'll be meeting at gate 3.Now this guy here, he can multi task.
Yeah, I can see some muppet pressing the button 5 seconds early, leading to mass pandemonium when the kicker appears to get to 0 on the clock and no play on call. Or worse, the umpire calls play on even though it's not 30 seconds.
You only have to look at some of the pillocks that they get as the TV umpire. Some of them are simply morons.
Sounds unnecessary.Sounds interesting.
You have 30 secs to start your run in. You can take as long as you want to do thatI can't believe there's so much opposition to this. The rule says you have 30 seconds to take a set shot. All this is doing is making sure it's followed.
And lol at the 'nooo Americanisation' complaints. The Yanks didn't invent the concept of counting.