Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grant Thomas on FC last night when pressed suggested that a reason that Reiwoldt might not of polled as well as he could have was due to his "pretty boy" image. He would have to be the ugliest pretty boy going around
I also laughed at this statement. My actual response was "are you shtn me".
Seriously though what a ridiculous statement to make, as if other AFL players are threatened enough by Reiwoldts amazing looks to not vote for him as payback.
Totally agree with that. Realistically the most valuble player in the comp is always the best CHF. However, it's voted for who they think is the best player each season, so yes change the name.I think it's the MVP part that is confusing. Key forwards/defenders are considered more valuable than midfielders. They should call it the Players' Player of the Year award.
The players got it right - Ablett was a clear winner followed by Swan.
Get over it Saints fans.
Grant Thomas on FC last night when pressed suggested that a reason that Reiwoldt might not of polled as well as he could have was due to his "pretty boy" image. He would have to be the ugliest pretty boy going around
Grant Thomas on FC last night when pressed suggested that a reason that Reiwoldt might not of polled as well as he could have was due to his "pretty boy" image. He would have to be the ugliest pretty boy going around
Sure does..he'd turn for the big Llama in a flash i reckon. Mind you Jason Dunstall would as well..he's got a massive crush on him too just quietly.Let's not forget Cornflakes has a massive stiffy for Reiwoldt
At least Jonathan Brown did not win most couragous again.. that was becoming a joke.
ShirtLifter,shouldn't you be off with the other Hawk supporters thinking up excuses for when your team misses the 2010 finals ?