- Thread starter
- #151
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At this point it's hard to seperate the rainbow from Pride, the best clubs can do is try to be creative a use a design which incorporates the colours in different ways, and I think this years batch is pretty good for that. The Bulldogs to me is the best of all, incorporating the trans colours in their traditional design.I’m all for clubs having pride jumpers so please don’t misinterpret this.
Surely there are possible ways other than the rainbow flag to celebrate pride on a footy jumper.
Great message, but the guernseys all look pretty average because that many colours is too messy.
Yeah I like the Dogs one, actually looks like that was the intended design, not a previous jumper with a rainbow crowbarred into it.At this point it's hard to seperate the rainbow from Pride, the best clubs can do is try to be creative a use a design which incorporates the colours in different ways, and I think this years batch is pretty good for that. The Bulldogs to me is the best of all, incorporating the trans colours in their traditional design.
It feels unnecessary to make the numbers harder to read like that. And I don't think the G logo is usually there on the back either? Some odd decisions here.
Yeah, covering all possibilities I suppose, but a bit wasteful really. Perhaps this is a result of uncertain fixturing for the clubs? I dunno, but there seems to be a very messy application of the wearing of the multitude of jumpers in this comp. I wouldn't mind seeing a toning down of the number of jumpers worn, and having set rounds for each one.clash pride guernsey for Port although won’t be worn!
View attachment 1845584
I kinda dislike this one. It has completely lost the sports team identity (literally would have had zero idea what the team was if i saw it at a glance).
From memory I think Mero revealed that in the men’s comp every club is required to design a home and clash version of their Indigenous jumpers and the fixture determines what jumpers are worn. Though I’m sure you’d recall we obviously didn’t wear a clash indigenous jumper and Richmond wore their clash version from the Dreamtime game against us at the MCG. I assume the same premise applies in the women’s comp with Indigenous and Pride rounds, but with only one of each round you’ll only really see a club wear one colourway. Thankfully not all was wasted, I’d say Port Adelaide has maybe the most active buyer base for jumpers in the league based on how big the Port Trade*laide group on Facebook is, and the club knows this given the annual changeroom sale is very popular. The Port Store had some clash PIs for sale which you someone on Instagram bought one of. Doesn’t look as good as the home version but a really cool collector piece.Yeah, covering all possibilities I suppose, but a bit wasteful really. Perhaps this is a result of uncertain fixturing for the clubs? I dunno, but there seems to be a very messy application of the wearing of the multitude of jumpers in this comp. I wouldn't mind seeing a toning down of the number of jumpers worn, and having set rounds for each one.
Richmond in yellow shorts. Looks good
I don't mean to be crass but did the designers think about this jumper before finalising the design? Like the rainbows on front and back meeting on the sides is a very interesting pattern, one which they probably should have tested before releasing.Interesting with the Suns pride guernsey. It was advertised with the full GCS logo but when they wore it last night only the GC
View attachment 1845585View attachment 1845586
230-68-39Looks like the AFLW’s main colour has changed from a salmon(?) to a bolder orange.
View attachment 1770618