manicpie
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 19, 2019
- 18,671
- 32,272
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
He'll fit right in with us thenCurrently missing practice due to a knee injury. Hopefully minor.
https://www.rotowire.com/cbasketball/player/alex-condon-22218
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'll fit right in with us thenCurrently missing practice due to a knee injury. Hopefully minor.
https://www.rotowire.com/cbasketball/player/alex-condon-22218
I think he would because he was so good at getting to the hoop, but the thought of him then kicking it out to a lower percentage shot because that's what the scoring system dictates doesn't sit well with me. It goes against the whole principles of an invasion sport.Would Jordan still be the goat if he played in this era, or have a very good career a a la Demar Derozan?
Jordan would have become a great 3pt shooter if he played in this era. There just wasn't as much emphasis on it then, but his workrate was legendary, he wasn't a bad shooter as it was, and his FT% was good, which is a fairly reliable indicator of outside shooting reliability usually.Would Jordan still be the goat if he played in this era, or have a very good career a a la Demar Derozan?
From 89-90 (his big 3PT shooting jump) until his final Chicago season, he was a 36% shooter from deep on 2.4 attempts per game, over a near-600 game sample size. Comparable % to LeBron (less attempts necessitated by era). Bron has had multiple seasons of elite shooting from deep and is a worse FT shooter than MJ.Jordan would have become a great 3pt shooter if he played in this era. There just wasn't as much emphasis on it then, but his workrate was legendary, he wasn't a bad shooter as it was, and his FT% was good, which is a fairly reliable indicator of outside shooting reliability usually.
A career 84% FT shooter with a godly workrate, focusing extremely heavily on improving his career 3pt% of 33% would easily get that to 38-40%, IMO.
Jordan would have become a great 3pt shooter if he played in this era. There just wasn't as much emphasis on it then, but his workrate was legendary, he wasn't a bad shooter as it was, and his FT% was good, which is a fairly reliable indicator of outside shooting reliability usually.
A career 84% FT shooter with a godly workrate, focusing extremely heavily on improving his career 3pt% of 33% would easily get that to 38-40%, IMO.
Yeah, he was an extremely good mid range shooter, which was considered the percentage play before someone did some simple maths. I have little doubt his 3 point percentage would be right up there if he played in this era. At the time, he got it competent, but it was just there as a fake to help him get to the ring.From 89-90 (his big 3PT shooting jump) until his final Chicago season, he was a 36% shooter from deep on 2.4 attempts per game, over a near-600 game sample size. Comparable % to LeBron (less attempts necessitated by era). Bron has had multiple seasons of elite shooting from deep and is a worse FT shooter than MJ.
I think he would adjust fine. Players with much worse natural shooting touch and lesser workrates have turned into perfectly fine 3PT shooters.
Now could be his only chance to play with Pendles. Pull the pin on the yanks.I'm sure people are in his ear about pulling the trigger on getting a pre-season into him now rather than waiting. Could be a part of something special if the stars align.
Legit. How could you pass up getting a hit-out to PendlesNow could be his only chance to play with Pendles. Pull the pin on the yanks.
No doubt. Someone gave the comparison of De Rozen. The better modern comparison to Jordan is SGA. Has the midrange and craftiness to get to the rim/paint. MJ, especially early, would have achieved the latter more through athleticism, but his shooting ability is comparable. MJ could absolutely have reached Shai's level of three point shooting. Both strong defensively, tho Jordan better at his best there.From 89-90 (his big 3PT shooting jump) until his final Chicago season, he was a 36% shooter from deep on 2.4 attempts per game, over a near-600 game sample size. Comparable % to LeBron (less attempts necessitated by era). Bron has had multiple seasons of elite shooting from deep and is a worse FT shooter than MJ.
I think he would adjust fine. Players with much worse natural shooting touch and lesser workrates have turned into perfectly fine 3PT shooters.
I have an extremely low opinion of the plastic surgery disaster Newperson..Not relevant however basketball related, I went to school with a bloke with the last name Landale. After his son signed a 4 year 48 million dollar contract with the Houston Rockets, Sam Newmans son who was a couple of years younger in same boarding house years after the fact lodges a claim for a bad back created apparently from being jumped on whilst boys were mucking about.
Coincidence?
Your assumption is correct.With all today’s re-signings, delistings and promises of re-rookie-ings (my head hurts) - can we still add Condon to the list as a Cat B?
I assume the answer is yes, due to the Cat B thingy, and the AFL’s ridiculously complicated list structure.
YesWith all today’s re-signings, delistings and promises of re-rookie-ings (my head hurts) - can we still add Condon to the list as a Cat B?
I assume the answer is yes, due to the Cat B thingy, and the AFL’s ridiculously complicated list structure.
Yup because Condon, Like Parker is cat B (where there is a spot available - Each club gets 2 cat B spots, used to be three pre-covid)With all today’s re-signings, delistings and promises of re-rookie-ings (my head hurts) - can we still add Condon to the list as a Cat B?
I assume the answer is yes, due to the Cat B thingy, and the AFL’s ridiculously complicated list structure.
Would have to be the first time in AFL history that one club has had 2 cat B rookies that were touted first round draft picks back in the dayYup because Condon, Like Parker is cat B (where there is a spot available - Each club gets 2 cat B spots, used to be three pre-covid)
Yeah, would be pretty rareWould have to be the first time in AFL history that one club has had 2 cat B rookies that were touted first round draft picks back in the day
It's been done to death before but here goes again - Big Mase was an accidental basketballer. He never played an organised game until college*. He was a soccer goalie.
* I do find it hard to believe that no one in his immediate vicinity - say a high school teacher - thought it might be an idea to chuck him on a court.
He’s not exactly skinny either.
View attachment 2149129
104 for his height isn't huge, for example Cox is 110cm and can look skinny on field at times.
Didn't Keeffe also have a soccer background?Mason Cox isn’t the only soccer goalie we’ve picked up.
The other one is going into his 17 season in the AFL …
Lachlan Keeffe
Maybe this whole “Basketball background” thing is BS (Shae Mac, Wyatt, Madgen, Wilson) and “Soccer background” is where it’s at!?
Cat Bs can be signed at any point in the year. The only difference is whether they're signed pre- or post-MSD each year. That has an impact on their base salary.With all today’s re-signings, delistings and promises of re-rookie-ings (my head hurts) - can we still add Condon to the list as a Cat B?
I assume the answer is yes, due to the Cat B thingy, and the AFL’s ridiculously complicated list structure.
It's decently heavy for a 19 year-old basketballer.104 for his height isn't huge, for example Cox is 110cm and can look skinny on field at times.
It's decently heavy for a 19 year-old basketballer.