All things re *Paul*'s afltables.com

[GoldbergsGold]

Anything lacking from this website that you guys want me to pass on?

Port Adelaide - Season Summary section has the incorrect RK for 2024. It should be 2/18, it's listed incorrectly as 3/18 the same as Geelong's RK.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Anything lacking from this website that you guys want me to pass on?

More likely user error than anything else but is there a way to easily see a summary of round by round attendances for a team?

 

[BF Tiger]

Anything lacking from this website that you guys want me to pass on?

Just my thanks.

 

[Catsace]

Love Paul's site, I look it up every week (particularly if the Cats win ), and it's my real go-to in terms off ooty stats.

One small detail though is the columns for the overall win tallies of teams, as the Pies have now moved into the rarified air of 1600+ wins, whereas no other club has exceeded 1500 yet. Just needs a separate spot for the Pies feat there.

Also going to be interesting if in a few more seasons Geelong could move ahead of Essendon for wins and win percentage. Collingwood, Carlton and Essendon have been the top three sides in that aspect since before W.W.2

 

[stemline]

Per other thread - AFL Tables is missing the score progression for 2004 Rnd 2, Haw v NM.

See attached. *Paul*

 

[*Paul*]

Thanks to all. I've been conspicuous by my absence, unfortunately this appears to be how it's going to be in future. Still planning to do the regular season updates. But as for additions and other minutiae, the motivation after 25 years has basically gone.

 

[Gibbsy]

Thanks to all. I've been conspicuous by my absence, unfortunately this appears to be how it's going to be in future. Still planning to do the regular season updates. But as for additions and other minutiae, the motivation after 25 years has basically gone.

This is sad but of course understandable. It's too much to ask of one man to maintain a website almost every week for a quarter-century.

Do you intend to pass the baton on at some point? (Not to me, but I would hate to see the site go under)

 

[*Paul*]

The way I create the site won't be usable by anyone else, so a seamless transition to another maintainer isn't likely. To have more or less the same thing, it would have to redone from scratch. When the final siren does eventually sound, I intend to put up all the raw data I possibly can, so at least someone can try something.