Bluelegs
Digging into the why
Interesting. I found the final act to be the worst part of the whole movie. Wasting its setups and undermining the stakes.Sorry guys - incoming bad review:
It's bad.
Marvel needs to seriously rejig their creative process. Almost everything they've put out in the last 2 or so years has felt rushed and convoluted. This one feels like the culmination of that, just going through the motions of what super hero movies have been like over the last 10 years, doing so without any care or consideration, completely benign.
It's pretty much 2.5hrs of actors standing in front of green screens without any props doing improv comedy, interlaced between a couple action set pieces.
The main positive is the villain - Kang, it does a good job selling us on him as the next big bad of the MCU, and that ends up feeling like the only reason this film was made. He doesn't really come into his own until the final act, in which the movie got its s**t together and became somewhat entertaining.
Marvel needs to start giving more autonomy to creatives. Right now it is so obviously being micromanaged by film executives, so the movies end up being slogfests that connect with no one, in an attempt to appeal to everyone. Seeing movies like Top Gun Maverick, Avatar 2, The Batman show what modern blockbusters can be like when studios let creatives do their thing has really shined a light on how dire the situation is with MCU movies.
I really hope they get their s**t together, cos right now Marvel movies are a bunch of arse.
Agree Kang is a good villain but really didn't feel like the movie for him to make his grand entrance. If you want a deadly serious, intimidating villain and you're playing them against quippy irreverant characters who don't take anything seriously you have to lower his status for comedic effect. Otherwise it's just tonal whiplash.
People didn't like Dr Strange but I thought that Wanda was a much more effective villain because the main characters seemed genuinely terrified of her.