Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

Remove this Banner Ad

jenny61_99 said:
LMAO. You crack me up. Join date March 2015.
Click to expand...

Isn't it more embarrassing that he's talking more sense than you and you have been here since 06
 

Log in to remove this ad.

jenny61_99 said:
Sense as in "he says what I think so therefore he must be right yez"? You two are like fruit flies. Shoo.
Click to expand...

You have been talking crap for a long time Jenny, you passed the point of being relevant long ago.

I have yet to see you say anything of value this side of 2015 and I dare say that probably extends back to well into 2014. But keep going I guess, doesn't hurt to try.
 
HirdsTheWord said:
You have been talking crap for a long time Jenny, you passed the point of being relevant long ago.

I have yet to see you say anything of value this side of 2015 and I dare say that probably extends back to well into 2014. But keep going I guess, doesn't hurt to try.
Click to expand...

funny....i think the same of you! :)
 
andrewb said:
I am REALLY interested in that question. I want to know what was in the needles. But, a trial that doesn't involve Dank will not answer that question. A process that doesn't involve Dank will not answer that question. What I really want to know is why ASADA went to great lengths to get the power to compel interviews and then didn't get the guy who was doing the injecting in to chat.
Click to expand...

And wasn't there supposed to be an ongoing fine of ~$1500/day for refusing?

<EDIT>
$5,000/day
Two others already mentioned it, my apologies.
</EDIT>
 
Last edited:
Duckworth said:
What difference does the join date make?
Click to expand...
Sure it does. I think when they are from my side of the fence, you call them trolls. Clearly someone reincarnated given their apparent depth of knowledge of my posting history.
 
HirdsTheWord said:
You have been talking crap for a long time Jenny, you passed the point of being relevant long ago.

I have yet to see you say anything of value this side of 2015 and I dare say that probably extends back to well into 2014. But keep going I guess, doesn't hurt to try.
Click to expand...
Lmao, you are hilarious. have you ever read the shit you write? I am on Pulitzer Prize winning standard compared to you buddy.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

andrewb said:
I am REALLY interested in that question. I want to know what was in the needles. But, a trial that doesn't involve Dank will not answer that question. A process that doesn't involve Dank will not answer that question. What I really want to know is why ASADA went to great lengths to get the power to compel interviews and then didn't get the guy who was doing the injecting in to chat.
Click to expand...
Easy answer - re documents you can say you don't have any - re interviews you can claim self incrimination. I suspect this is how he avoided being interviewed (as it is the only way to avoid it under the act).
 
jenny61_99 said:
They asked him once they had their super power. I guess they didn't want to go the whole hog knowing it was a pointless exercise. He signed a stat dec that said he had no documents, and he told them he had nothing to say to them. So you can fine him a shit load of money and still end up with nothing... or just get on with the job at hand.
Click to expand...
Get real with your guesses- ASADA has a $5000 pecuniary penalty per day. That is 5000 bucks per day and they don't impose it? You cop a lot less for not lodging a tax return. If you took your blindfold off you'd be asking why they don't want to go near Dank.
 
Red_Emperor said:
Get real with your guesses- ASADA has a $5000 pecuniary penalty per day. That is 5000 bucks per day and they don't impose it? You cop a lot less for not lodging a tax return. If you took your blindfold off you'd be asking why they don't want to go near Dank.
Click to expand...
We didn't lodge a tax return for 6 years. Didn't get fined either. The penalties are there, they aren't always applied.
 
jenny61_99 said:
Was commenting on the propensity for you guys to work in tandem. It's quite sweet when you think about it. Ganged up on? By those two? Pfffft. You are funny! :p
Click to expand...
Weird how you only comment on Essendon fans propensity.

Your bias is showing Jen. ;)
 
jenny61_99 said:
And weird how you only pick me up on picking up Essendon fans. I'll show you my bias and match with with yours.
Click to expand...
:D

I, an Essendon fan, tend to stand up for...... Essendon?

No way.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

Similar threads

The_Wookie
Play Nice Happy 10th Anniversary (of the Essendon/ASADA Saga)
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
blackcat
blackcat

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top