Where is this coming from? Or is it another Big Footy assumption that’s being written as fact? Up to now I’d never heard a peep about Moore’s endurance being an issue...
At least with Davis it opened many people’s eyes to the fact that player can actually play other roles, instead of their current one.
Delivery always questionable from my experience watching him so that might prove a negative. That said, kicking out of a contested back half while under siege might prove irrelevant if he became a marking option on the wing and had the opportunity to offer service to forwards as a permanent mid, or wingman.
If we had 4 of home it would be awesome to play 1 in each spot, fwd, wing, back and ruck, but alas we don’t. If we could recruit or develop a quality key back or 2 then perhaps Son Of Peter forward would be great.
Moore on a wing isn't needed. McEvoy isn't a very good full back. He's very slow and easy to beat if your smart.
Usually, but think they gave them today off and let them have a long weekend with tomorrow being a holiday
look above, I already posted his insta post lol
Not all clubs have the same training schedule. So those that trained today may not have trained on friday. But because we did, they gave them monday off, with tuesday a holiday.
CHB is a critically important position for us...we have many wing options. The other issue with Moore is his injury history, i would not be keen for him to be doing more run and bending down at pace to pick up the ball.
I posted exactly that on another site.
I agree. More than anything, to see if he can actually be an AFL footballer. Because I don't see him cracking into this team as anything else.
