- Thread starter
- #26
So much hate, so much anger. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere on here a while back that the guy who started the international cup WANTED the games at Royal Park so they could be side by side.
Then play it at Albert Park. There are about 10 ovals within walking distance to the Junction Oval which holds 20,000 and is used by the amateurs and has been an IC venue in the past. The Ross Gregory is equipped for night matches and has around the ground seating at elevated levels.
http://maps.google.com.au/maps?hl=e...5754,144.97889&spn=0.004405,0.009656&t=h&z=17
Funnily enough, it is where South Africa and New Zealand both chose to train .... why not let them play there as well and have some spectators along.
Even Casey Fields, where the under 18s played is a better venue.
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere on here a while back that the guy who started the international cup WANTED the games at Royal Park so they could be side by side.
I very much doubt it. The people who started the International Cup in 2002 were the International Australian Football Council. The AFL forced them to close shop and ever since they took over the event it has gone to crap.
Don't get me wrong, the AFL have lifted their game immensely with the coverage on their website etc for international development. But it is patently clear that they are too scared of international footy being taken the wrong way to make a proper go of it.
But I don't think it that bad a product. I've paid money to see some pretty shit amateur rugby matches in my time ... I know the demand is there, I have seen it first hand especially now that it is being promoted a little better.