Re: Epl 25/26/27
So, what you seem to be saying is the following:
If there is no contact, it's cheating - as in Rooney vs Arsenal.
But if there's minimal contact (we'll use the Reina example), then it's just playacting?
In both cases, a player is trying to get an unfair advantage by sucking in the referee. Therefore, both players cheated - Rooney against Arsenal and Robben against Liverpool.
And there are plenty of other foreign players who don't get hounded.
I agree with you on Shearer.
With exceptions? A nice little out clause there.
Definition? Geeze, and I thought hiding behind semantics was strictly a Cooldude thing.
If they both continue, then maybe more will be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
You've only been registered on BigFooty for a month or two and I can't remember you doing anything except defend Chelsea.
No. If managers told their players not to dive, then refs wouldn't have to make the decision, would they?
Magic Lamps! said:Rooney isn't tagged a diver because he isn't cultured and is the English media's love child. Imagine the media frenzy that would've followed had it been Robben that had of ended Arsenal's unbeated run with a solo diving performance on absolutely no contact.
What Rooney did that day was cheating. That's what diving is IMO. And if we assess diving as players falling down on NO CONTACT then Robben has never dived, Rooney has. And unless you can provide me an example otherwise then your argument is flawed, very flawed.
So, what you seem to be saying is the following:
If there is no contact, it's cheating - as in Rooney vs Arsenal.
But if there's minimal contact (we'll use the Reina example), then it's just playacting?
In both cases, a player is trying to get an unfair advantage by sucking in the referee. Therefore, both players cheated - Rooney against Arsenal and Robben against Liverpool.
Magic Lamps! said:The main point being, players like Pires, Ronaldo, Robben are all exceptionally skilled foreign players. And were hounded by the press for certain incidents. Pires being the only one guilty of anything IMO.
And there are plenty of other foreign players who don't get hounded.
Magic Lamps! said:I don't consider Rooney a diver or a cheat. BUT if he was we'd hardly hear about it.
But I ask the question why hasn't Alan Shearer recevied years of crap in the media for his years of cheating?
It's a valid question.
I agree with you on Shearer.
Magic Lamps! said:And it reempahises my point that foreign players receive substantially different treatment from the English media (with exceptions).
With exceptions? A nice little out clause there.
Magic Lamps! said:On no contact, no. Unnecessarily, yes. Definition is the key here.
Definition? Geeze, and I thought hiding behind semantics was strictly a Cooldude thing.
Magic Lamps! said:But that's exactly what Robben has done this season. And from what I've seen Ronaldo's been the same.
If they both continue, then maybe more will be willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Magic Lamps! said:No of course not. Carvalho and Huth both often employ similar tactics. And I never said or implied otherwise. The different is players like Carvalho and Huth don't need to do it as often.
Did you read what I said above about Joe Cole?
Have you heard my opinion on Drogba's actions over the years?
Did you hear me defening SWP from the Newcastle game?
You've only been registered on BigFooty for a month or two and I can't remember you doing anything except defend Chelsea.
Magic Lamps! said:Disagree. Referees are as much to blame, as are the opposition. If the fouling isn't there and the referee exercises appropriate control then diving would substantially less of a problem.
No. If managers told their players not to dive, then refs wouldn't have to make the decision, would they?