- Jan 16, 2016
- 4,276
- 9,098
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
To me this is strategic by the AFL. Smells rotten.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
a few years ago melb had a sponsor called energy watch whose ceo wrote racist and other shocking comments on his fb page, melbourne dropped them like a hot potato. i suggested he wrote on purpose so get contract cancelled and save company money. this ffc story has got the hallmarks of something similarI get the impression the AFL are trying to push a few of ASADAs buttons.
Daring them to step in and prevent Prismall from working at FFC if they feel inclined.
What worries me is that any sanction would come down on the AFL not Footscray and would effect everyone for not being compliant.
Are the AFL looking to jeopodise it's association with WADA , easier than walking away without the fallout.
Keep government funding coz all we did was let a drug cheat work at a club, meant no harm!
Trying to read between the lines as it is rather clear that he should not be employed by any AFL club.
To me this is strategic by the AFL. Smells rotten.
AFL please explain!Banned players have been prevented from helping out in kids sport.
How can Prismall be involved at the highest level in the sport he was banned from???
Don't think ASADA would act quickly if that is what the AFL are hoping.
Think they are looking for the out without saying they are withdrawing from drug code.
They fear loss of government funding.
They fear backlash from supporter base ( brand damage )
If they can stage manage them being kicked out drug for non compliance the government would be in the gun to take action.
The AFL is a huge business , it worries me that the government are already on board.
To me this is strategic by the AFL. Smells rotten.
ASADA defied as banned Dog at work
BANNED former Bomber Brent Prismall is working at the Western Bulldogs in defiance of advice from the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority. Prismall is the only member of the Essendon 34 who ­remains in the AFL system.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscri...f7a6021b69fad2cab0003123629&memtype=anonymous
My inner cynic imagines the AFL attempting to provoke WADA to expel it, by fiddling at the edges rather than blatant defiance. Far-fetched?
Teacup style?The AFL are heading into unchartered waters….
I'd suggest that the AFL have little faith in the CAS decision and will bend the rules as much as possible.
How about Mark McVeigh at GWS - Believe he is still working at GWS - At the end of the day what can WADA do ? They've never stopped banned Russia athletes from training with Russian coaches and in fact competing in Russian events
This sport is forked at the professional level. Needs a clean out.
Needs to be fourkedJust let Hawthorn win the 2016 flag first
So are essendon going to get 12 welfare officers and they all look after each other?I think the rules allow you to work at a sporting club just not playing or coaching capacity. Thought that was made clear on the first day of the suspension. Prisnall is suspended from playing or coaching, not from his job as a Welfare officer. Even WADA allows players to have a day job, even in sport. Think GWS moved Vitamins McVeigh into a non-football role.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...s/news-story/0ea11aca160341f72b8c20ab54fb3ef3
So are essendon going to get 12 welfare officers?
Ask Brett goodes what he did?It's what is called a grey area. Given that was Prisnall's day job but not that of the Essendon players, I'd say not, although suppose technically they could, as McVeigh is for GWS in an admisistrative role. You are allowed to work with any sporting organisation as long as it's not direct hands on eg: playing, coaching, on-field-support staff. Administrative roles are ok. Depends what one considers a welfare officer.
It's what is called a grey area. Given that was Prisnall's day job but not that of the Essendon players, I'd say not, although suppose technically they could, as McVeigh is for GWS in an admisistrative role. You are allowed to work with any sporting organisation as long as it's not direct hands on eg: playing, coaching, on-field-support staff. Administrative roles are ok. Depends what one considers a welfare officer.