I'm not knocking it - as I said before, it has massive potential to provide clean green energy for the world, once the technology matures.The same blokes that talk up battery technology improving knock nuclear technology advancements .....yeah OK.
However, the reality right now is that this is still very much in the research phase. We're still decades away from the first commercial reactors coming online. The French are currently building the ITER reactor, which is hoped will be the first to generate more power output than input - but the reactor won't come online until 2039 at the earliest, and is for research purposes only.
I'm all for nuclear fusion, but it's something that our grandchildren will be benefiting from. You and I will be long gone, dead, buried and forgotten, before the first commercial nuclear fusion reactor comes online.
What was reported in that article, which you clearly didn't bother reading, is that the Chinese managed to achieve a stable plasma field in their Tokamak reactor for just over 1000 seconds (beating the old record of ~400 seconds). They did not achieve ignition, and generated no energy. What they achieved is one small step in a very long process towards achieving nuclear fusion. As the article points out, commercial grade reactors are still decades away - but you neither know this (having not read the article), nor do you care (as your only motivation is shit stirring).
Last edited: