-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Back 10 $2.00 winners, win 20,000.
- Thread starter mattys123
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Bump this thread.
I'm going to give this a go again, probably tonight.
I'm going to give this a go again, probably tonight.
Any tips?
this post is pointless as you havn't alluded to anything
Don't know what Jan Juc is on about but I'm starting this again.
$20 Di Luca over Uran @ $2.05 (Vuelta a Pais Vasco - Stage 2)
A few 2+ chances I liked tonight and will start this off again with this one.
$20 Di Luca over Uran @ $2.05 (Vuelta a Pais Vasco - Stage 2)
A few 2+ chances I liked tonight and will start this off again with this one.
i am at the $1440 bet on another forum.
going to struggle to find something i like though @ 2s for that
going to struggle to find something i like though @ 2s for that
Nice one.
Yeah. I'm just going to stick the 1.20 and $2 ones to cycling and motorsport.
- May 14, 2010
- 865
- 264
- AFL Club
- West Coast
there was a thread called $$$$$$ going around a few weeks ago about people's massive winnings.
Jan Juc posted something about some strategy he has for the races that has a ridiculous strike rate.
Pointless?
Browse through the exotics results at Mandurah dogs last night. See if you can notice anything out of place.
I wish you well in your endeavours.
stab??
The_Doctor
Club Legend
- Jul 23, 2009
- 2,393
- 104
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I just looked through it and nothing looks out of place. What are you reffering to?
If by "nothing looking out of place" you meant for eleven of the twelve races the average pool size for an exotic bet type was $278, and the other race was 727% greater than this, then yes, I agree with you, nothing looks out of place.
The_Doctor
Club Legend
- Jul 23, 2009
- 2,393
- 104
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Where are you getting these results from? The average pool for an exotic bet is over $278. I usually use The Tote for results but there pool results are playing up again.
The_Doctor
Club Legend
- Jul 23, 2009
- 2,393
- 104
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I have no idea what those prices are even for, they are just pointless if you dont elaborate a bit. Are they duet prices or something?
The exotic bet type I am talking about at the venue I am talking about on the night I am talking about had pool sizes of (S-Tab):
151
305
214
215
296
208
471
2,019.50
265
245
333
353
I've derailed this thread. That's all from me.
151
305
214
215
296
208
471
2,019.50
265
245
333
353
I've derailed this thread. That's all from me.
The_Doctor
Club Legend
- Jul 23, 2009
- 2,393
- 104
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Dont worry PMed you
danielz_23
Premiership Player
bump again.
been trawling through these 'strategy' / 'challenge' threads and thought I'd fire this one up again...
had four work colleagues group together recently where they each selected a 1.20 chance and put them in a multi each week (approx $2.00 return) and double up over five weeks - starting at $200 with $50 contributed each. End result was a $6,000 pay day on the second attempt!... $1,500 each, thank you very much.
so its got me thinking about these again...
10 $2.00 winners to $20,000
20 $1.20 winners to $2,000
... so on... and on... they all sound good but are a tough ask and eventually come unstuck it seems largely because when you drop the ball once you have to start again. So I had this thought that I'm sure can be modified in many ways to suit...
This is very systematic:
(1) Each bet/multi returns odds of $2.00
(2) Starting with $110, each bet is to profit $10 (wage = 1/11 of bank)
(3) When a bet loses, you bet $30 and as such return a net profit of $20
(4) If that bet loses you have a final attempt where you bet the remaining $70 of your bankroll and if successful returns a net profit of $30 (ie. $10 for each 3 bets). You then return to the original $10 stake (1/11)
(5) If you are kicking on after 11 bets (winning and losing) you hit $220... and double the stake/profit.
(6) ... and so on and so on to $440 (22 bets), $880 (33), $1760 (44), $3520 (55), $7040 (66)...
The basic principle is that if you have a run of 3 consecutive incorrect bets at odds of $2.00 you are done, but this would appear to be generous given the strategy this thread is based on... although the return is not as 'flashy' (not that I've known it to be achieved).
been trawling through these 'strategy' / 'challenge' threads and thought I'd fire this one up again...
had four work colleagues group together recently where they each selected a 1.20 chance and put them in a multi each week (approx $2.00 return) and double up over five weeks - starting at $200 with $50 contributed each. End result was a $6,000 pay day on the second attempt!... $1,500 each, thank you very much.
so its got me thinking about these again...
10 $2.00 winners to $20,000
20 $1.20 winners to $2,000
... so on... and on... they all sound good but are a tough ask and eventually come unstuck it seems largely because when you drop the ball once you have to start again. So I had this thought that I'm sure can be modified in many ways to suit...
This is very systematic:
(1) Each bet/multi returns odds of $2.00
(2) Starting with $110, each bet is to profit $10 (wage = 1/11 of bank)
(3) When a bet loses, you bet $30 and as such return a net profit of $20
(4) If that bet loses you have a final attempt where you bet the remaining $70 of your bankroll and if successful returns a net profit of $30 (ie. $10 for each 3 bets). You then return to the original $10 stake (1/11)
(5) If you are kicking on after 11 bets (winning and losing) you hit $220... and double the stake/profit.
(6) ... and so on and so on to $440 (22 bets), $880 (33), $1760 (44), $3520 (55), $7040 (66)...
The basic principle is that if you have a run of 3 consecutive incorrect bets at odds of $2.00 you are done, but this would appear to be generous given the strategy this thread is based on... although the return is not as 'flashy' (not that I've known it to be achieved).
