Rules Baghdad Bombers to be penalized, committee called upon.

Should the Baghdad Bombers receive a penalty?

  • Yes

  • Absolutely


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Why would you be asking me again when I have already said I don't have access to the team PM?

You're really making yourself look foolish here. I, and likely most others will choose to believe that a whole team decided to co-ordinate a boycott of a match thread than believe that by pure chance a whole team all decided to not post in a team thread.

I get you're blindly trying to support your ex-team and friends but they are guilty and they will be found guilty in the committee.
You say I'm making myself look foolish even though you, nor anyone else, can answer the question.

I don't have enough crayons to feed you.
That's because you ate them all
 
It only takes one committee member to bring up WW on a charge of disrepute and three others to ratify it.

I think there is enough to warrant investigation by neutral parties. I have suggested this ahead of consideration of whether disrepute charges be laid.

The Terms of Reference should provide the investigators with access to PMs on the basis these will not be published.

This should include PMs involving TFN, Metalcrusher and JWS and extracts of SLG type PMs related to the three cases.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You say I'm making myself look foolish even though you, nor anyone else, can answer the question.


That's because you ate them all

Let me just log into my JWS account and I'll see what's in the team PM.
 
Not even the Bombers get 20 posters a week
Yes correct as always ......but we'll rebuild in the off-season ....please have patience with us thru this rebuild phase

1584694516052.png
 
Of course the Bears should be penalised. So should WW19.
I get this ....like an accident, if the other car wasn't there, the accident wouldn't have occurred ......so you become partly culpable
 
I think there is enough to warrant investigation by neutral parties. I have suggested this ahead of consideration of whether disrepute charges be laid.

The Terms of Reference should provide the investigators with access to PMs on the basis these will not be published.

This should include PMs involving TFN, Metalcrusher and JWS and extracts of SLG type PMs related to the three cases.
You are a curious little Monkey
 
I don't have access to the team PM they have and let's not be silly. You're way smarter than that to be playing this game. It's co-ordinated.

I recall the Bombers made similar claims when they were found guilty.

Actually, I thought we were up front about boycotting the match thread within a day or so..
 
Last edited:
I think there is enough to warrant investigation by neutral parties. I have suggested this ahead of consideration of whether disrepute charges be laid.

The Terms of Reference should provide the investigators with access to PMs on the basis these will not be published.

This should include PMs involving TFN, Metalcrusher and JWS and extracts of SLG type PMs related to the three cases.

You are ****ing joking aren't you?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If anyone has anything more than "the Bears haven't posted so they must be guilty" I'd like to hear it

It's actually a fair point. Zero posters in a match thread bear-ly registers a dip below their S.29 posting average.
 
I think there is enough to warrant investigation by neutral parties. I have suggested this ahead of consideration of whether disrepute charges be laid.

The Terms of Reference should provide the investigators with access to PMs on the basis these will not be published.

This should include PMs involving TFN, Metalcrusher and JWS and extracts of SLG type PMs related to the three cases.

Lol.. happy to share the PM's from Crush.. Your allegations would be thrown out/laughed at in an instant! 😆😆
 
It only takes one committee member to bring up WW on a charge of disrepute and three others to ratify it.

I proposed execution for WW19 last time and did anyone support it...

And now here we are.... :p
 
I proposed execution for WW19 last time and did anyone support it...

And now here we are.... :p

Personally I would have supported this action. This is why I would abstain from participating in any independent investigation of WW19. I am clearly biased on the matter.

I am delighted that esteemed poster KohPhi has agreed to put PM chat with and about Metalcrusher on the table for private review by a team of neutral observers. I have full trust the Admin and Committee will appoint an ethical investigatory team. I hope that KP also agrees to make available all relevant details of the JWS and TFN related PMs.
 
Can’t be bothered reading back, but did anyone else identify the biggest crime here to be how Hate chose to spell ‘penalised’ in the thread title?
 
So pantsredacted - you strike me as an impartial person. Here is a proposition.

Given the Committee will not consider the question of whether WaynesWorld19 has brought the game into disrepute through a series of events, I ask them to set up an Independent Inquiry.

I suggest you, people like brahj and Kennedy Parker be requested to investigate and report on whether WW19 has brought the game into disrepute in the matters of:
* TalkingFootyNow1223
* Metalcrusher
* Josh Wooden Spoon
We all know the answer to that tho.

A big fat solid, YES.

Tender love and care isn't WaynesWorld19's strong suit. Its drama and manipulation, for all the **** ups he makes and i 100% agree he needs to step down in all leadership roles. The drama is well worth the read.
 
We all know the answer to that tho.

A big fat solid, YES.

Tender love and care isn't WaynesWorld19's strong suit. Its drama and manipulation, for all the fu** ups he makes and i 100% agree he needs to step down in all leadership roles. The drama is well worth the read.
It's good to see that bitterness has not been eating away at you ......you got to stay with your beloved Gumbies, and are amassing an amazing career with an innovative and dynamic club .....clearly the envy of all other clubs in the SFA

Surely life couldn't be sweeter
 
Honestly the Bombers behaviour that week they boycotted was worse than the boycot itself. For those who weren’t here, they went around spamming other threads with racist Indian memes.

At least the Bears didn’t run around ruining others enjoyment.
This is out of line imo.

Ruining others enjoyment is BAU for The Bombers. To claim it was exclusively that week is disingenuous.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rules Baghdad Bombers to be penalized, committee called upon.

Back
Top