Dogs and Saints would say no, that’d be way too good for Geelong.
so dogs will be happier if geelong gives a f1 to stkilda like the original trade?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Dogs and Saints would say no, that’d be way too good for Geelong.
so dogs will be happier if geelong gives a f1 to stkilda like the original trade?
Trading Macrae and Smith for pick 7 in either trade is wild. Smith should be worth that alone (obv it won’t happen Geelong’s f+f1 is most likely)
Trading Macrae and Smith for pick 7 in either trade is wild. Smith should be worth that alone (obv it won’t happen Geelong’s f+f1 is most likely)
Based on last year it seems dogs rather not focus on potentials for next season. They need to bring in midfield talent to replace aging players. In 2yrs it'll be without potentially Libba & Treloar as main midfield with Bont maybe needing more time forward. So Sanders, Richards, Gallagher, Garcia, Harmes, & maybe west. A low pick is what dogs want reportedly & 7 Satisfies that. The trade favors saints because 7 is obviously going to be in demand.so dogs will be happier if geelong gives a f1 to stkilda like the original trade?
So deep that Bevo had to throw a Hail Mary putting Lobb back because he didn’t trust those in the VFL.
Cap is fine. We asked about Barrass and have met with Houston so there is space to bring someone in even if we kept Macrae.what is the appeite for the dogs to keep mcrae and his sizable deal when dogs need to be in a position to offer a decent paid rise to their two best players next year.
You mean regular draft? I believe players aren't able to set contract demands in that. Bailey would never put himself through that. Rather chance going to Tigers if that was his choice.Geelong have no obligation to give an out of contract player 2 first round picks.
They would absolutely walk him to the National Draft before doing that.
Luke Ball did IIRC. Played for $500k in his first year and base salary for the second.You mean regular draft? I believe players aren't able to set contract demands in that. Bailey would never put himself through that. Rather chance going to Tigers if that was his choice.
Luke Ball did IIRC. Played for $500k in his first year and base salary for the second.
Rules may have changed since then.
It's moot as Richmond have a truckload of cap and loads of early picks.
You think if Cats demanded the same from dogs if they took an out of contract player like Smith for a top 10 pick? They asked and got Eagles to cough up a big deal for Kelly. I expect if Dogs say a top 10 pick is the deal that Cats will find a way to make it happen or come close.Richmond are not going to waste a first rounder in a deep draft on a guy who doesn’t want to be there.
They aren’t stupid.
We saw this happen with Luke Ball, no one grabbed him and he got all the way to the Pies pick with no one else picking him up as he only wanted to get to one place.
The Draft threat is just BF posters trying to act like a hostage situation whereas List Mangers are far more mature and actually care about how it affects their job performanc.
Either Dogs accept the deal (it’s not even a bad deal, this draft is deep) or they get nothing and spited themselves over a guy who isn’t even in their long term plans. Not to mention piss off the AFL, D’Orazio who has a tonne of clients, The Player Union etc etc.
Everything else being said is posturing from people who aren’t even ITK
You think if Cats demanded the same from dogs if they took an out of contract player like Smith for a top 10 pick? They asked and got Eagles to cough up a big deal for Kelly. I expect if Dogs say a top 10 pick is the deal that Cats will find a way to make it happen or come close.
That's the thing though. If it's not a top 10 pick then 16 and 2nds aren't going to work. It's more than likely their F1 will be involved. It's not like cats are going to fall to bottom 5 in 1 year. They're not the pies who lost a bunch of players to cap spending issues ran by the worst list manager ever or demons and their list management issues.This NEVER happens. We asked for that from the Eagles. Eagles just spammed us with the crappy picks they had. We will do the same to you when it comes to the crunch, less a future first rounder compared to TK.
Yeah but TK was twice the player Bailey is. It's not a comparison. The equivalent is a first and secondThat's the thing though. If it's not a top 10 pick then 16 and 2nds aren't going to work. It's more than likely their F1 will be involved. It's not like cats are going to fall to bottom 5 in 1 year. They're not the pies who lost a bunch of players to cap spending issues ran by the worst list manager ever or demons and their list management issues.
You think if Cats demanded the same from dogs if they took an out of contract player like Smith for a top 10 pick? They asked and got Eagles to cough up a big deal for Kelly. I expect if Dogs say a top 10 pick is the deal that Cats will find a way to make it happen or come close.
Keep pretending every single fan of every other team doesn't do the exact same thingCats fans discrediting opposition players to indulge their dreams of getting every player ever for massive unders... Some things never change.
View attachment 2115895