-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement. -
Supercoach Rd 20 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup - Quarter Finals - Last Coach Standing - Final 6 ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025! ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 20 AFF Talk Rd 20 - AF Trades - Captains/VCs
Bendigo FL discussion 2024
- Thread starter jayco13
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Aug 16, 2009
- 8,069
- 12,378
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- North Ballarat
Sadly, from afar it does seem to be the case.
The clubs themselves need to solidify their own ongoing viability.
I feel too many expect other to solve these sorts of problems for them which is a recipe for disaster.
People can only take copping a pounding for so long before they walk away, surely a future in another comp is preferable to not existing at all?
Exactly look at nully and Wycheproof, the southern mallee thunder and Ouyen united got on the front foot and success followed.
Multiple mergers are need around castlemaine and Maryborough
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
At a guess, I'd suggest he is saying that clubs need to make the choice to merge or else they run the risk of disappearing.
It is not AFLCV's role to force clubs to merge - on these issues they should provide guidance or advice. The clubs need to show leadership and be on the front foot. Two clubs in the Maryborough district did this last year but the issue is that there are still too many clubs in that area.
- Oct 5, 2004
- 2,175
- 2,415
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Avoca FNC, Ouyen Kangas FNC
You are correct Roota. Too many clubs with too many agendas and self interest which has got in the way of any change occurring.
A good example of the resistance to change was the work completed by AFL Goldfields in 2017 which recommended change to the football landscape around Maryborough and included Clunes joining the MCDFNL and Carisbrook into the Central Highlands FNL. The response to the recommendations was a defiant ‘no’ despite significant engagement with clubs and stakeholders. If some of the changes occurred football may be in an improved state in the region.
Have a look at clubs like Campbells Creek, Dunolly, Avoca and Talbot who are all perennial strugglers and any good players these clubs may have (often home grown) are ‘snapped up’ by other district clubs often on payments well above their realistic market value. The unwillingness of clubs to work together and make change continues. Even when the Maryborough Giants were suggested, some of the feedback from surrounding clubs was less than helpful/ complementary despite both Rovers and Royal Park being aware of their predicament and going on the front foot to get the best outcome possible.
A good example of the state of football around Maryborough and Castlemaine is the top 4 for the MDCFNL has probably already been decided this early in the season with the same clubs up top. That is not healthy for anyone with the lack of competition but these clubs can’t see past their noses to realise football in the area is not in good health.
It should be noted that demographics of the area with an ageing population, a loss of young people due to work and study and the cost of living issue are also impacting greatly on the ability of clubs to obtain players and be sustainable for the long term.
Finally the amount of money being offered to players by some of these district clubs is often astonishing. Individuals are receiving well above market value in many cases and whilst you can understand players going there due to the money and benefits on offer, this is impacting greatly on football in the area. It is not sustainable.
It would be great if all clubs in the region could work together but I cannot see this occurring due to the continued self interest, lack of foresight and acceptance that things need to change to ensure football remains sustainable and a sport for all in the region.
Last edited:
- Oct 5, 2004
- 2,175
- 2,415
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Avoca FNC, Ouyen Kangas FNC
You are correct Trent. As someone that was involved in the bringing together of Walpeup Underbool and the Ouyen United clubs, the merge has been successful and has overcome many challenges. This is due to all involved looking at the bigger picture and a commitment to ensure there is football and netball (and recreation and social opportunities) in the area for youth and the general community.
Whilst there are challenges with a reduced population, less young people and an older demographic, the new club is in exceptional health, financially strong and has excellent community and business support. The merge allowed the club to enter the Mildura and Adelaide markets and resulted in many former and high quality players returning to play often for payment well less than what was on offer elsewhere.
Finally the merge has also seen a strong family focused culture develop and this now makes the Ouyen Kangas a club that is very attractive for players, their families and both the general and business community want to be a part of.
Unfortunately many clubs around Maryborough and Castlemaine can’t see beyond the entrance to their respective home ground and therefore change is not on their agenda despite it being urgently needed.
Last edited:
F
Forest St End
Guest
Those comments are so out of touch they are frightening. If that is the leadership then god help the game.
With all due respect to the learned minds in this discussion, to me there is a lack of clarity about the fundamental issues at play here.
Yes there are too many clubs, everywhere, not just in Castlemaine and Maryborough but that is only part of the equation.
Fact is Castlemaine and Maryborough, the Giants, Campbells Creek, Harcourt, Maldon, Newstead and Carisbrook could all merge tomorrow and create a super club but they would still not have the ability to compete in the long term in Bendigo.
There are multiple factors at play that create a playing field that is hopelessly lopsided in favour of the other Bendigo clubs.
If you analyse simple demographics, economic and employment data, it is plain and clear that a club from those areas will not be sustainable against most of the other clubs in the longer term.
The only way to change that is to employ equalisation measures. In the same way St Kilda would never be able to compete with Collingwood if the AFL didn’t use equalisation mechanisms, neither will the country clubs if it doesn’t happen in country footy.
What can league administrators actually do to help Maryborough? Really I’d love to know. The only way is to have clubs merged or dissolved so that the number of options for players is reduced.
The best scenario is for clubs to be proactive and so it themselves so that the can maintain some identify, family links, sponsorship money and community support
Ouyen United, Berri Culgoa Sea Lake Nandaly, Southern Mallee Thunder and let’s not forget Kerang (which is actually an amalgamation of Kerang, Rovers and Appin) are examples of how things need to be done
Crazymaggy2020
All Australian
- Jul 19, 2023
- 696
- 597
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
They could start by equalising the competition. How many points did the top 4 teams come back this year ? Or did they stay the same ?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Crazymaggy2020
All Australian
- Jul 19, 2023
- 696
- 597
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Better than doing nothing. It will take a few years like stopping clubs having advantages in the junior spaces but if you act on it eventually it will help equalise. Nothing has been done to maintain equality and that’s why the comp is now dog sh$&
Like If we just stood back and accepted that violence against women was going to happen and changes were too hard to make an impact. We have to keep challenging the wrongs but you need courage to do so
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
fatkidinthepocket
All Australian
- Aug 19, 2020
- 982
- 1,163
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Points appear to be irrelevant in Maryboroughs case as if you read into Gurus post they seem perhaps to not be in a great financial position anyway, they could have 60 points and wouldnt have the money to improve off that. Any chance of a Maryborough/Castlemaine merge? With the population makeup of both towns(Maryborough almost appears to be an attractive retirement town/Castlemaine with a trend to the arts) it would appear that neither is in a financial position to continue to go alone for much longer. As far as Maggys hobby horse goes instead of whinging about the ability of the Bendigo based teams to poach your youth, do something to make your team more attractive to the youth.
They are too far apart
F
Forest St End
Guest
They would be relevant if the system worked.
I posted in last year’s thread how points would look if AFL Victoria had a common sense system where team points automatically adjusted each year depending on ladder position. With that model since the start of the points system Gisborne would be about 34.
The team that beat Maryborough had 35 but the devil is in the detail.
Blake playing as a 1 pointer. Let’s say there were no discounts and you cop an extra point for moving clubs in the same league, and another point if they are a higher points team. Now he costs 6, and the other two boys from Castlemaine cost 4 more. Already they are on 44.
Take away all the other discounts and they are not recruiting blokes from Castlemaine because there is no way they can play them. They have to play some local kids instead. Maryborough still lose and by plenty but it’s not the bloodbath it was and will continue to be.
The biggest joke is the loyalty discounts after one year (loyalty, my arse).
There should be no discounts for loyalty until a player is into his fourth season at a club, then you wouldn't have clubs gaining up to six points each year for recruits returning after one year.
That would then make it the equalisation measure that AFLV was probably hoping for initially (they only problem was the poor initial execution of the system).
There should be no discounts for loyalty until a player is into his fourth season at a club, then you wouldn't have clubs gaining up to six points each year for recruits returning after one year.
That would then make it the equalisation measure that AFLV was probably hoping for initially (they only problem was the poor initial execution of the system).
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Crazymaggy2020
All Australian
- Jul 19, 2023
- 696
- 597
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Surprising appointment of the inter league coach [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Thread starter
- #1,196
I know it doest matter big picture wise but how many of the 'star' players from the 'lower league' clubs in that area would hang around to play in the Bendigo league??
Many would be out there for the $$ or coz they don't have the time to commit to playing 'major league' footy.
The merger gives you, hopefully, more players but what would the quality look like??
F
Forest St End
Guest
You’d think that would be a no brainer for the points system, given its sims.
Crazy would point to the fact it isn’t there as strong clubs having influence over AFL Vic and it’s hard to find an alternative argument.
Crazymaggy2020
All Australian
- Jul 19, 2023
- 696
- 597
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Crazy not so crazy when it comes to this topic
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
F
Forest St End
Guest
Maine picks up Joey Montagna in the Carlton Draught, will play round 13 v Eaglehawk.
Drew the last pick and not really going to get much out of it apart from a marketing exercise you’d think.
Drew the last pick and not really going to get much out of it apart from a marketing exercise you’d think.
