Best field of teams since 1997

Remove this Banner Ad

Jun 23, 2004
13,506
38
AFL Club
Adelaide
One way to gauge the strength of a premership side is by looking at what they were up against. The genuinely good sides since 1997 (when the competition commenced in its current form), you'd say, were:

1997: St Kilda, Western Bulldogs, Adelaide, Geelong, North Melbourne (who admittedly battled for much of the year with injuries to Carey and Corey).

1998: North Melbourne, Western Bulldogs, Melbourne, Adelaide, St Kilda.

1999: Essendon, Kangaroos, Brisbane, West Coast. Many tend to forget how electrifying the Lions were in 1999, whilst WCE were top of the table fodder for the first 15 or so weeks.

2000: Essendon, Carlton.

2001: Brisbane, Essendon, Port Adelaide, Hawthorn.

2002: Brisbane, Port Adelaide. Collingwood and Adelaide were good for much of the year without being awesome, and Essendon had the names, but they didn't match their talent. Didn't mind the Dees that year, either.

2003: Port Adelaide, Collingwood, Brisbane. Sydney were good, but not brilliant, as were Adelaide.

2004: St Kilda, Port Adelaide, Brisbane.

2005: West Coast, Adelaide, Sydney.

2006: West Coast, Adelaide, Sydney, Fremantle.

2007: Geelong, West Coast. Collingwood were consistent, Port flashy but hardly awesome (again, just IMO).

2008: Geelong, Hawthorn, Western Bulldogs.

On that basis alone, I'd say that 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2006 had the best fields (if we were talking Melbourne Cups), perhaps giving greater value to the flags won in those seasons. Then again, maybe not.
 
I would agree with a lot of those. 2007 was a very lean year, we were probably the best after Geelong but crippled with injuries in the finals, and there wasn't much after that. Collingwood pushed them in the prelim but I wouldn't say they were really a top team compared to other years.

Not sure where I'd rate the Bulldogs of this year either. I don't think they were as good as the prelim finallists in 05 or 06 (Adelaide was excellent both those years, and Fremantle was very strong in 06)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'd agree re WB in 2008, but their record is pretty solid. Still didn't rate them too highly, but I still don't think the competition was that lean in '08. Maybe it was.
 
Interesting thread, agree with most of that.

Intriguing that up until this last season, there seems to be a South Australian team up there every year, though rarely at the same time. I've noted this before (in my head) without looking at it in depth. Sure enough, I'd say Port are on the rise whilst Adelaide are on the slide, so they'll probably swap positions yet again.
 
What about 1996?

North, West Coast, Brisbane, Sydney, Essendon and Carlton were all very, very good sides and were only separated by 6 premiership points after round 22. Not only that, all six of them had 15 or more wins for the year. The gap between the top 8 and the bottom 8 in 1996 was probably bigger than any other year that I've been watching footy.
 
One way to gauge the strength of a premership side is by looking at what they were up against.

I completely disagree with this statement.

The strength of a premiership side (or any side really) has absolutely nothing to do with who they play. The strength of a side is dependent only on how good the players are in that team, and how well those players play together. The rest of the competition has nothing to do with it.

What you are saying is that a team could have the greatest collection of individual players of all time, be the best coached team of all time, and play the best as a team of any team of all time, but if the rest of the comp that year were average, then the team could never be considered better than average.

What a complete load of garbage.

How good a team is and the strength of its competition are mutually exclusive. Only on BigFooty would it be considered otherwise.

Put it this way, the 2000 Essendon team is the best individual season team I have ever seen. But by your reckoning they can't be considered "strong" because Carlton were their only real opposition that season. I repeat, what a load of garbage.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

1997: St Kilda

1998: North Melbourne

1999: Kangaroos

2000: Essendon

2001: Essendon

2002: Brisbane

2003: Brisbane

2004: St Kilda

2005: Adelaide

2006: Adelaide

2007: Geelong

2008: Geelong
 
2004: Port Adelaide, Brisbane, St Kilda, Geelong and i would also put Melbourne up.

2005: West Coast in my opinion was the best team, followed by Sydney, Adelaide, St Kilda

2006:West Coast, Adelaide, Sydney, Fremantle were also very strong

2007: Geelong, Port Adelaide, West Coast. Collingwood were nothing special that year in my opinion.

2008: Geelong, Hawthorn were really the only standouts for me.
 
Agree with everything you have written from 2000 onwards.

It really shows how little competition Geelong had in 2007. Port,Collingwood and the WB were never going to seriously challenge them. WC were crippled by injury and at full strength would have given Geelong a good showing, but thats how it goes.
 
1997: St Kilda

1998: North Melbourne

1999: Kangaroos

2000: Essendon

2001: Essendon

2002: Brisbane

2003: Brisbane

2004: St Kilda

2005: Adelaide

2006: Adelaide

2007: Geelong

2008: Geelong

And still no flag to show for it. Hurt much??
 
Well im my opinion if we beat you guyz i bet we wouldda bet Sydney!

Ha, the tale of the massive fish that got away. You will have your time in the sun again. As will we and good luck then... Maybe next time you will beat us at AAMI.
 
1997: St Kilda

1998: North Melbourne

1999: Kangaroos

2000: Essendon

2001: Essendon

2002: Brisbane

2003: Brisbane

2004: St Kilda

2005: Adelaide

2006: Adelaide

2007: Geelong

2008: Geelong


whtttttttt????? um we did the double tht year u twat

and just shows tht in 05/06 how much the crows choked in them finals
 
Melbourne of 1998 would have to get a mention, we beat the eventual premiers Adelaide in the first week of the finals convincingly. If it wasn't for two weeks of rain during the middle of the season where we lost to geelong and stkilda (i think) by plenty we would have gone close to winning it!
 
1997: St Kilda

1998: North Melbourne

1999: Kangaroos

2000: Essendon

2001: Essendon

2002: Brisbane

2003: Brisbane

2004: St Kilda

2005: Adelaide

2006: Adelaide

2007: Geelong

2008: Geelong

St. Kilda? :eek:

Finished 3rd in the H&A (1 game and 5 percentage points behind Port; 10 percentage points behind Brisbane). Lost by 7 goals to Port in their only H&A game at York Park. Split their H&A games with Brisbane: winning by 1 point at home but losing by 7 goals away. Got absolutely smashed by Brisbane by 13 goals in the Qualifying Final. Lost to Port in the Preliminary Final.

What's the reason again that they were a better team than Port or Brisbane in 2004? Is it because they beat Adelaide twice?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Best field of teams since 1997

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top