Voting Thread
Round 14 - 2006 - MCG
Designated voters
cschreuder61
La Vache
LukeHodge15
philhawk
Roughie
haydnoconnor
Embers
Locky
macca69
peterss
weagles_fan
Lonie_from_50
VOTING CLOSES TUESDAY at 5:30PM
Voting details, rules and new announcements
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
macca69 said:5 - Judd
4 - Everitt
3 - Lynch
2 - Mitchell
1 - Hansen (could have gone to about 10 players, but he was integral to our structure and continued to work all day)
philhawk said:Come on mate, you can't be serious. No Hodge? Did you even watch the match? ...
5 - Hodge (HAW)
4 - Judd (WC)
3 - Lynch (WC)
2 - Mitchell (HAW)
1 - Everitt (HAW)
I dno, thats just the way I feel. West Coast won in the end, but those 5 players were the difference.
macca69 said:How can u give him 5 votes. Was good for a half then got towelled up in the second half. Beat Selwood easily, but when the game was there to be won, Stenglein thrashed him IMO.
philhawk said:Because he was to me, as well as Fox Footy team, the best player on the park? Judd was contained in the first half while Hodge was only contained in the 3rd quarter?
You seriously reckon he didn't deserve any points?
macca69 said:I just like to give votes to players, who play well for 4 quaters, especially when the game is there to be won. I was at the game, but wouldn't surprise me if the Fox Footy team including Bartlett and Tony Shaw would pick Hodge, despite Judd being dominant for 4 quaters. Couldn't care less who the fox footy team deam as the best players, completely irrelevant IMO. Didn't play any better than Everitt, Mitchell, Judd and Lynch. Could give him maybe one vote, but his 2nd half was ordinary IMO.
philhawk said:
You really don't have a clue unfortunately. It's debatable whether Judd or Hodge should have gotten 5, but you seriously reckon his performance warrants only 1 vote. Thats absolutely hilarious. Let's see how many people here give Hodge a vote that isn't 5,4 or 3 ...
philhawk said:Because he was to me, as well as Fox Footy team, the best player on the park?
LukeHodge15 said:5 - Judd (WEST COAST) - BOG for mine
4 - Hodge (HAWKS) - Clearly the reason why we nearly won
3 - Lynch (WEST COAST) - Dominant forward on the ground
2 - Spider (HAWKS) - Smashed Gardiner/Seaby
1 - Mitchell (HAWKS) - another typical sammy mitchell game, might be a little harsh on him
macca u are joking arent u
macca69 said:when the game had to be won, where was he? Stenglein absolutely towelled him up. Wrong move putting Selwood on him in the first half. Very hard to give votes to someone who only plays a half, despite him being BOG at half time. I personally think that Everitt was easily the Hawks most influential player and Mitchell towelled up Kerr and got 35 odd possessions. Williams' 5 goals almost got himone vote from me. Those 3 IMO had a bigger impact on the game for four quaters.
LukeHodge15 said:when the game was there to be won, it was those little men in ornage that got u over the line........nothing hodge could do about that.
macca69 said:he could have not handpassed the ball to Cousins and thus sealing the game
LukeHodge15 said:lol......yeah that woulda helped.
awesome game of footy. watched the game today on replay.
its sad way to look at it, but the hawks gone from pick 4 to pick 3 in the 2006 draft.
macca69 said:Kangas were always going to come good IMO. Surprised at how good the Hawks were after watching them play the Saints the week before. Very promising signs, but if Everitt goes, you may not improve as much as your team's potential would suggest. Good core group of young players, but the depth isn't there yet. Despite what a lot of our supporters say, we did play some good footy and wasn't all that far from our best form, considering Cox was out. The intensity was there, and u pushed us all game, however I feel Woosha was out-coached by Clarko (worryin for Woosha IMO). U guys played like a top 8 side (u played better than the bulldogs did against us IMO), u find yourself a replacement for Spida and another young KPP (keen on Lachy Hansen by all reports) and u are looking good IMO.
LukeHodge15 said:im starting to lean towards gumbleton with our first pick. if he is there
not sold on a couple of weaknesses i see with hansen.
but geez his contested marking seem pretty unvbelievable, and that key aspect im huge fan of. even if todays game is shying away from it.
LukeHodge15 said:lol......yeah that woulda helped.
awesome game of footy. watched the game today on replay.
its sad way to look at it, but the hawks gone from pick 4 to pick 3 in the 2006 draft.