Black Diamond AFL

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
To be honest, from the BDAFL website after the qualifying final, to the various posters over the last month, Its becoming a bit tired to hear the old "Cardiff had an off Day" chestnut trotted out.

They were favourites and rightly so, after a great home and away series, but they were beaten twice in the finals by a disciplined and better team on the day.

Thats twice in a row, when do the excuses stop I wonder and the rightful recognition paid?

City didn't have a bad day last year, they choked was the call, whats different this year?

Harden up and take your medicine.
 
To be honest, from the BDAFL website after the qualifying final, to the various posters over the last month, Its becoming a bit tired to hear the old "Cardiff had an off Day" chestnut trotted out.

They were favourites and rightly so, after a great home and away series, but they were beaten twice in the finals by a disciplined and better team on the day.

Thats twice in a row, when do the excuses stop I wonder and the rightful recognition paid?

City didn't have a bad day last year, they choked was the call, whats different this year?

Harden up and take your medicine.

Well, I am not sure about having an off day - A look at the 1/4 by 1/4 scores shows they lost the game in 1st 1/4. In both the ressies and the firsts, the team kicking with the wind easily out scored the other team, EXCEPT in the first quarter of the firsts (in the 3rd, they outscored City by 30 to 2).

Once they failed to capitalise on that, they were stuffed for the rest of the game. (So forget about ice vests etc at the breaks, they had lost it by the first break)

So the question is, did they loose it or did City win it ? I dont think I am able to judge that for two reasons,
1) You dont get a good picture of the whole game when you are concentrating through a telephoto lens looking for that great mark or tackle shot (as I did for most of the game)
2) I am no expert on AFL (as my tipping scores shows)

but as they say, you can only play as good as your opponents let you

P.S. I dont support either side (I am slightly biased towards Warners Bay as I live down that way and they bought some photos from me) but I also thought it was great that a different club won each grade. Having only one or two teams completely dominate is not good for a comp
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Well, I am not sure about having an off day - A look at the 1/4 by 1/4 scores shows they lost the game in 1st 1/4. In both the ressies and the firsts, the team kicking with the wind easily out scored the other team, EXCEPT in the first quarter of the firsts (in the 3rd, they outscored City by 30 to 2).

Once they failed to capitalise on that, they were stuffed for the rest of the game. (So forget about ice vests etc at the breaks, they had lost it by the first break)

So the question is, did they loose it or did City win it ? I dont think I am able to judge that for two reasons,
1) You dont get a good picture of the whole game when you are concentrating through a telephoto lens looking for that great mark or tackle shot (as I did for most of the game)
2) I am no expert on AFL (as my tipping scores shows)

but as they say, you can only play as good as your opponents let you

P.S. I dont support either side (I am slightly biased towards Warners Bay as I live down that way and they bought some photos from me) but I also thought it was great that a different club won each grade. Having only one or two teams completely dominate is not good for a comp


Agreed Dave it was great to see different clubs win the 3 grades.

As far as analysing the matches, I agree you can go 1/4 by 1/4 and it shows the wind etc. In all the grades the game if broken down that far each one was lost in the 1st quarter either by building a large lead or in the case of the ones, not large enough.

The point I was making, was that despite these facts and coaching, ice vests or what ever, both teams had the same conditions to play in, so to lose, its not a bad day, the dominant team in Every grade got the bickies, so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak.
 
"so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak." - swans12

I am not sure about making excuses, but the way I see it as Cardiff fairly easily beat city in the home and aways, and City reversed this in both the finals, one of 3 things must happened

1) City played better in the finals that the home and away
2) Cardiff played worse in the finals than the home and away
3) A combination of the above in some proportion.

Now I think it was (3), the Hawks key players (Ryan et al) seemed to struglle, but the City players lifted across the ground.

I enjoy a healthy debate discussion about a game, just saying team A was better than team B (while self evidently true) makes for a pretty short discusssion. Hey, its a long time until next season, we need something to kick around until then
 
Agreed Dave it was great to see different clubs win the 3 grades.

As far as analysing the matches, I agree you can go 1/4 by 1/4 and it shows the wind etc. In all the grades the game if broken down that far each one was lost in the 1st quarter either by building a large lead or in the case of the ones, not large enough.

The point I was making, was that despite these facts and coaching, ice vests or what ever, both teams had the same conditions to play in, so to lose, its not a bad day, the dominant team in Every grade got the bickies, so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak.


Mate as far as I can see no one from Cardiff has come on here and made any excuses. Ice vests, strong winds, coaching etc. all that stuff has been brought up by various people from varying clubs as observations not excuses. For me an “excuse” would be someone coming on here complaining about the umpiring, injured/unavailable players etc, such has been the case throughout the year by other supporters. But nothing.

Tall Poppy Syndrome is rife. People having a go at Cardiff cause they haven’t won a flag for 2 years now. Warners Bay haven’t won one for 15 years, why don't we bag them for failing? The emphasis (and celebration in some cases) that people from other clubs have put on Cardiff losing only disrespects the achievements of City.

So I suggest you "Shut up and take your medicine" cause your making shit up now
 
Good Photos Dave!

What a very good game on Saturday between two very good teams.

Cardiff had an off day and they paid for it by being beaten by newcastle. Cardiff were definitely outcoached by Harrington, who did a terriffic job in the finals, embarrassing the Hawks with better tactics and game plans.

Everybody whinged about the umpiring this year.. Interested to note no clubs whinged about them so obviously they had a good day.

Here is an example of the crap SS Dumbo, hope there is many more off days to be had.
I dont think its me talking shit mate, just putting the losses into perspective, something about counting your chickens isn't it.
 
being a cardiff representative, i didnt find anything wrong with how the day went, apart from not getting the win in firsts, but hey, city are a good side and deserved it. so theres no need for sour grapes in anyway shape or form.

i had a chat to many of the city siders after the game, personally, i think they're a good club, most of them anyway (i dont know everyone). They didnt boast or rub it in our faces, which made it easier to chat after the game.

there's ppl that get on this forum just to instigate fights by talking trash about clubs and how they played etc, its not needed.

there arent any excuses for the loss, but if i were to put it down to why it was a loss and not a win, itd be that cardiff were out-coached. (there are of course other reasons along side this one but its the major one i believe).

so, another year is gone, any news for the next season? new clubs? any clubs being dropped from firsts?
did i hear a rumour about bdafl looking into 4 boundary umpires?


Just a thought...
should bdafl have a pre-season comp, similar to the AFL, and shorten the length of the season by 2 or 3 rounds?
opinions?
being a cardiff representative, i didnt find anything wrong with how the day went, apart from not getting the win in firsts, but hey, city are a good side and deserved it. so theres no need for sour grapes in anyway shape or form.

i had a chat to many of the city siders after the game, personally, i think they're a good club, most of them anyway (i dont know everyone). They didnt boast or rub it in our faces, which made it easier to chat after the game.

there's ppl that get on this forum just to instigate fights by talking trash about clubs and how they played etc, its not needed.

there arent any excuses for the loss, but if i were to put it down to why it was a loss and not a win, itd be that cardiff were out-coached. (there are of course other reasons along side this one but its the major one i believe).

so, another year is gone, any news for the next season? new clubs? any clubs being dropped from firsts?
did i hear a rumour about bdafl looking into 4 boundary umpires?


Just a thought...
should bdafl have a pre-season comp, similar to the AFL, and shorten the length of the season by 2 or 3 rounds?
opinions?

Pie Eater, Was there for all but the start of the 18's and it was a great day at the footy (not connected with any of the clubs involved)
As for next year I think that Belmont are starting a club for Auskickand possibly 10/12 year olds depending on numbers!
Nelsons want to drop to ressies and hope to get 18's.
The league apparently stopped the Singleton/Muswellbrook merger this year due to time constraints but hopefully wont stand in the way if these clubs choose this path(this would create a full 3 grade club)
Any other news?
 
Here is an example of the crap SS Dumbo, hope there is many more off days to be had.
I dont think its me talking shit mate, just putting the losses into perspective, something about counting your chickens isn't it.

A few things:

Firstly, Man at work does not claim or indicate to be a Cardiff supporter or player. So you cannot attribute the post to a Cardiff person having sour grapes.

Secondly, you have taken the quote out of context:

Good Photos Dave!

What a very good game on Saturday between two very good teams.

Cardiff had an off day and they paid for it by being beaten by newcastle. Cardiff were definitely outcoached by Harrington, who did a terriffic job in the finals, embarrassing the Hawks with better tactics and game plans.

Everybody whinged about the umpiring this year.. Interested to note no clubs whinged about them so obviously they had a good day.

Add that to the equation and it is clear that Man at work is not making excuses, rather acknowledging that City were better coached.

Thirdly, this is a quote from City's website:

"Cardiff was outcoached and outplayed by a talented City outfit that followed up its second semi win with another impressive performance to show it has ended the season as the premier first grade team."

If you attribute people making observations about the coaching on the day as "making excuses" then City are obviously making excuses for Cardiff.

And finally, you're an idiot.
 
A few things:

Firstly, Man at work does not claim or indicate to be a Cardiff supporter or player. So you cannot attribute the post to a Cardiff person having sour grapes.

Secondly, you have taken the quote out of context:



Add that to the equation and it is clear that Man at work is not making excuses, rather acknowledging that City were better coached.

Thirdly, this is a quote from City's website:

"Cardiff was outcoached and outplayed by a talented City outfit that followed up its second semi win with another impressive performance to show it has ended the season as the premier first grade team."

If you attribute people making observations about the coaching on the day as "making excuses" then City are obviously making excuses for Cardiff.

And finally, you're an idiot.


Here's my initial post mate, just to confirm things.

"To be honest, from the BDAFL website after the qualifying final, to the various posters over the last month, Its becoming a bit tired to hear the old "Cardiff had an off Day" chestnut trotted out."

No one mentioned Cardiff, which is obviously where you are from, but I suppose your still a bit precious after getting beaten.

Various posters, (I never mentioned Cardiff specifically) were quoting that Cardiff had had 2 off days, credit to the winners was all I was saying.

This crap is why everyone non Cardiff was hoping you would get beaten in every game on the day. Some (Cardiff people) will call it jealousy, others call it arrogance.

As for the personal abuse mate, go as hard as you like, it just confirms my point.

Have a nice Day
 
Here's my initial post mate, just to confirm things.

"To be honest, from the BDAFL website after the qualifying final, to the various posters over the last month, Its becoming a bit tired to hear the old "Cardiff had an off Day" chestnut trotted out."

No one mentioned Cardiff, which is obviously where you are from, but I suppose your still a bit precious after getting beaten.

Various posters, (I never mentioned Cardiff specifically) were quoting that Cardiff had had 2 off days, credit to the winners was all I was saying.

This crap is why everyone non Cardiff was hoping you would get beaten in every game on the day. Some (Cardiff people) will call it jealousy, others call it arrogance.

As for the personal abuse mate, go as hard as you like, it just confirms my point.

Have a nice Day

Mate your just making up shit to back you up.

Cardiff are not accountable for what is written on the BDAFL website. And you also quote the rather ambiguous "various posters" as saying that Cardiff had an off day.

So when you state "Harden up and take your medicine" you were not directing it that at Cardiff people? Were you directing at "various posters" who have not stated an affiliation with the Hawks?

Or when you write "Every grade got the bickies, so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak" you are not directing that at Cardiff people making excuses? Are you directing it at "various posters" to stop making excuses about a club they have not stated an affiliation to?

And then you question why can't we call what happened to Cardiff a choke? Doesn't saying Cardiff choked take away from City's victory and in turn contradict your whole argument



I would say "various posters" on this board are dic kheads (by which I mean you)
 
Mate your just making up shit to back you up.

Cardiff are not accountable for what is written on the BDAFL website. And you also quote the rather ambiguous "various posters" as saying that Cardiff had an off day.

So when you state "Harden up and take your medicine" you were not directing it that at Cardiff people? Were you directing at "various posters" who have not stated an affiliation with the Hawks?

Or when you write "Every grade got the bickies, so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak" you are not directing that at Cardiff people making excuses? Are you directing it at "various posters" to stop making excuses about a club they have not stated an affiliation to?

And then you question why can't we call what happened to Cardiff a choke? Doesn't saying Cardiff choked take away from City's victory and in turn contradict your whole argument



I would say "various posters" on this board are dic kheads (by which I mean you)


Mate, no one said that Cardiff were responsible for the website (past GM for that I believe), or for any other posts for that matter, so what are you trying to say?
You are obviously from Cardiff so get over it, you lost and now your'e dribbbling.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

"so to make excuses as some are is pretty weak." - swans12

I am not sure about making excuses, but the way I see it as Cardiff fairly easily beat city in the home and aways, and City reversed this in both the finals, one of 3 things must happened

1) City played better in the finals that the home and away
2) Cardiff played worse in the finals than the home and away
3) A combination of the above in some proportion.

Now I think it was (3), the Hawks key players (Ryan et al) seemed to struglle, but the City players lifted across the ground.

I enjoy a healthy debate discussion about a game, just saying team A was better than team B (while self evidently true) makes for a pretty short discusssion. Hey, its a long time until next season, we need something to kick around until then


Last round against Cardiff i thought this mob aren't capable of winning the GF. I think what you said in the above is utter BS, i think to many clubs showed Cardiff way to much respect throughout the year and cardiff had them beat before they went out to play. They have I think 3 excellent players and about 5-6 strong players the rest are just the average player.
City on the other hand have a good solid range across the park. watching the GF i thought they had about 7-8 excellent players and the rest were all solid contributors.

anyone agree??
 
Haha good to see the Warners Gay "Players" putting the smack down on the Hawks straight after grand final.

Didn't have much to say last week after getting beaten by the Hawks in the prelim did they?

Haven't seen Warners Bay even get close to challengeing for a flag in the ones.

And the only way I see Warners Bay getting close to winning a flag is for City to fold and all the excess players spilling to them...

Hunter, Hodges, Pederson, Oakley, Street, Brunkhurst...



your forgeting mate pederson won city a flag which you would not of got without him after west folded (fact) plus there is lots of other west people sprinkeled through that club!. you no nothing of the crunch as the great rizzbang would say!!
 
Nah mate, I'd rate Coulopous and Burton as the most important players in defining our '03 season. Although Pedo was a quality bloke

Hey and Warners Bay, Don't forget Grant, Deitz and Crotty.....

It's the players other clubs reject that make Warners Bay the best.

And i'll have you know he is still a quality bloke:D
 
Since everybody is being nominated for the AFL draft, I would like to nominate Scot Ducker...
Also thanx to Punthead for the kind words...was a good night :thumbsu:
 
Last round against Cardiff i thought this mob aren't capable of winning the GF. I think what you said in the above is utter BS, i think to many clubs showed Cardiff way to much respect throughout the year and cardiff had them beat before they went out to play. They have I think 3 excellent players and about 5-6 strong players the rest are just the average player.
City on the other hand have a good solid range across the park. watching the GF i thought they had about 7-8 excellent players and the rest were all solid contributors.

anyone agree??

I don’t agree.

If Gosford were to show too much respect they’d offer complimentary valet parking at Adcock Park, large expansive change rooms for the visitors with free masseurs and fruit platters, and then a complimentary 3 course meal including wine after each game.

Playing like shit, in my opinion, does not constitute showing respect.
 
Have been away on holidays the last week or so.

I have to say the GF was a great game. Not being a supporter of either team, it looked to me that, as said by other people, City certainly out played Cardiff on the day and deserved their win. Something tells me the City coaches have been crafting their "battle plan" for some time.

Cardiff are a great football team and go about their business in a very professional way. While there can be only one winner, it was good to see a great game between 2 excellent teams in conditions (perhaps a bit hot!) that allowed players to show their skills.

Well done to the Umpires. The fact they were hardly noticed is a good indication that they had a good day.
 
Any truth to the rumour that the Black Diamond AFL are getting rid of the Reserve (hacks) competition and the Under 18's and replacing them with one Under 23's competition similar to the Colts competition in Rugby?

you would hope not. what would happen to all those over 23's that dont get a game in seniors?? you would only drive more people away from the game. it would be interesting having an older age group than 18's.... might have a few fuller lineups around the clubs and make the transition into senior footy a bit easier for the young ones
 
Any truth to the rumour that the Black Diamond AFL are getting rid of the Reserve (hacks) competition and the Under 18's and replacing them with one Under 23's competition similar to the Colts competition in Rugby?

BTW, I don't support Cardiff.... Why would I want to do that?

Surely the Black Diamond would not be that stupid...but then again maybe they are?
 
Any truth to the rumour that the Black Diamond AFL are getting rid of the Reserve (hacks) competition and the Under 18's and replacing them with one Under 23's competition similar to the Colts competition in Rugby?

That would be a really daft decision, even more so than Netball!

If that were to come to the fore, we would have a situation where kids who are 16, fresh out of Juniors playing against grown men, some of who are only just out of first grade. While young guns could handle themselves pretty well (the guys that WB have blooded over the last few years as an example), how are young guys who are just out for a bit of a kick going to fare?

Obviously the intention, if this is in fact true, is to try to keep those just out of 18's in the game. Perhaps instead of doing this they could increase the under age comp to U/19 (which I think RL has done), and/or implement a rule where there must be X number of U/23 players in the Reserve Grade match squad (i'd suggest 5 as most clubs would find that an easily achievable task)

But then again, the Board will probably do whatever suits Cardiff best right? :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top