As always you write terrific well thought posts. I applaud you for that.I agree with all of that. My problem is that this trade seems to be directed at the rest of the AFL community in terms of messaging rather than at us.
Say, you're the CEO of the Blues; good on you, for starters! You have this situation, you have what you think will play out, you have the ongoing process of getting there. You have a series of choices you need to make; are you open or closed in terms of the flow of information to and from the club to the fans or the press? Are you going to insist on a hardline stance from your list management, or are you staying well out and letting them run the show? What are you going to do, and how are you going to react to what happens as it happens?
I'd argue that there are two problems with how we've ran this thing; one, we've operated with extreme silence (which I approve of, if our stance is going to be hardline rather than open) and we've virtually ignored the media unless we've had something official to report. On the other hand, we've been accomadating towards other clubs, up to facilitating their own trades with our picks. The latter stance is understandable only if you inform your supporters of it!!!
By doing this, we've been hardened against Essendon by their own policy of feeding the media their narrative, and this has in term hardened our expectations. They had little to no leverage, outside of the AFL proceeding to gift them a pick immediately in front of ours undermining our ability to split the pick. And I reiterate: he was out of contract, they'd bitched about him to the press, and he'd flagged his intention to be perfectly okay going to the PSD.
I hate messaging, the notion of creating your own narrative concerning situations. But this is an example of allowing the other club to shape your messaging and letting that mislead your fanbase. That's a problem.
But I think that is a lot of unneccessary over complication.
End of the day its a footy club and we are a better footy club than we were two weeks ago.
It doesnt get much simpler and when the games are played none of the politics or semantics or the sideshow between seasons will matter.
Especially not to the the vast majority that follow the club.
As to the Saad deal itself I thought it was going to be psd or pay more than we may have wanted all along and no in between and its turned out that way. Also this way we didnt have to offer a ridiculous inflated contract.
Last edited: