Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

 
Last edited:
Watching Barnham he is a joke. I can see how the week ended up where it did the way he is talking right now and his body language. Body language and actual words are s**t
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Holy smoke Batman.

Looks like pretty much no one in management is going to lose a job.

"We are trying to work out why Geelong has played in 8 prelims and we haven't". I can tell them that and all I require is a coffee and a croissant.
Ah no
He’s not going to come out and say people are going to get sacked today
They run the review and if the review says people should be sacked, then they will leave.
 
That was the first time anyone at Essendon has acknowledged organisational failings in ****ing god knows how long. It’s a start.
 
trainwreck GIF


That press conference.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Wow, that was bad. I missed the start but did he have any prepared written remarks to make. You know, so it didn't sound like he was making it up as he went along.
 
No positions not under review. Wants direct comparison with other clubs. External review should be telling us what is Geelong doing, what is Collingwood doing, what did Richmond do. Why are Geelong getting x prelims in x years? What are they doing differently?

Add that to internal review.


(Doesn't mean it won't come back and say the thing they're doing differently is not having ex-footballers on their board)
I thought he said no position was under review.
 
One positive was that he didn't just speak in hollow corporate jargon.

One negative is that assessing the coaching position on Sunday doesn't seem to in any way line up with the timing of an external review.
The coaching role needs closure one way or another, you can't let Rutten hang in the breeze for a month or six weeks while a review is conducted.
 
How many messes do we need though? Have we reached expert level yet.
We have. Richmond and Melbourne spent as much time doing it not that it is any comfort.
 
No positions not under review. Wants direct comparison with other clubs. External review should be telling us what is Geelong doing, what is Collingwood doing, what did Richmond do. Why are Geelong getting x prelims in x years? What are they doing differently?

Add that to internal review.


(Doesn't mean it won't come back and say the thing they're doing differently is not having ex-footballers on their board)
Carlton said David Teague and Cain Liddles positions weren't under review either when they did their external review last year. It means bugger all.

If he says 'yeah, nah I'm just looking for the broom I need thats big enough to clean out the club then they're goneski' he would have then entire club walking on egg shells more than they are.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top