Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

 
Last edited:
If you want to be embarrassed about something, there's an entire Banking Royal Commission to worry about, where Thorburn actually did and said stuff, rather than getting caught up in whether he should be excluded because of something his church did. One bozo on twitter talking about nothing groundbreaking is hardly evidence of a circus, all things considered.
without wanting to break one of my interwebz rules on religion posting and stuff, but what do we know of the other CEO's and the boards they sit on
 
I would still keep the ad up if I was the club. City on a Hill aren’t the Westboro Baptist Church but still, great, big, ****ing yikes.
Are you sure it's the same one?

There's a City on a Hill church based in New Zealand which is Evangelical, the one Thorburn is involved with is Anglican, and then there's another similarly named one in the USA as well (City on the Hill).
 

Log in to remove this ad.

By all accounts a pretty decent human. I imagine The RC stuff would speak more to his inability to provide governance than the provision of direct instruction to, for example, charge fees to corpses. He wouldn’t be on his Pat Malone in being unable to be across all aspects of an organisation this size. That’s not to excuse him but I think it reflects as much on the size and structure of the organisation - it would be impossible to be across everything you need to be as CEO.Happy to be told I’m wrong, didn’t follow it closely.

It’s interesting that he’s a total non-footy person yet he is charged with restoring focus on core business, i.e footy. I remain unclear on how a layman can direct and manage a footy department. Can we not find a Gale or Cook who is qualified to manage on and off-field operations?
 
oh here we go...

" Andrew has a Commerce degree and an MBA, and is an accredited Sports Chaplain"

 
Are you sure it's the same one?

There's a City on a Hill church based in New Zealand which is Evangelical, the one Thorburn is involved with is Anglican, and then there's another similarly named one in the USA as well (City on the Hill).
Anglican in name, they're Evangelicals in practice.

Given he's managed to keep that stuff clearly out of his banking life, I hope he does the same with Football. If he can keep the club focused on football, that will be a great outcome.
 
By all accounts a pretty decent human. I imagine The RC stuff would speak more to his inability to provide governance than the provision of direct instruction to, for example, charge fees to corpses. He wouldn’t be on his Pat Malone in being unable to be across all aspects of an organisation this size. That’s not to excuse him but I think it reflects as much on the size and structure of the organisation - it would be impossible to be across everything you need to be as CEO.Happy to be told I’m wrong, didn’t follow it closely.

It’s interesting that he’s a total non-footy person yet he is charged with restoring focus on core business, i.e footy. I remain unclear on how a layman can direct and manage a footy department. Can we not find a Gale or Cook who is qualified to manage on and off-field operations?
I'm not really sure why a CEO at a professional footy club would need to be a person with extensive AFL experience.

You mentioned scale... the bigger the organisation presumably the more you hire underlings you trust and delegate to them. Essendon is tiny compared to a bank with branches all over the country, but it does look like football functions will be put in the hands of a well-qualified GM-Football and Senior Coach, which I suppose is part of the reason we have Brad Scott and not Adem Yze.

What's interesting about Thorburn is he's a banker, and more recently an investment banker. If he's remotely competent he'd have a pretty good idea of what a successful business looks like, either so private equity can invest in it or so a bank can authorise a loan, regardless of what the specific core business is for each one he's investing in.
 
To put it in perspective, Essendon has a incoming of ~$60 million per year and outgoings of ~$50 million per year and about ~$50 million in assets.

NAB is about ~$20 billion per year incoming, outgoing of ~$10 billion and about ~$60 billion in assets.
According to reports his take home pay at NAB was 6.4m per year.

Essendon's cash profit before grants and donations, depreciation and amortisation in 2021 was a touch under 5m. Campbell was reportedly on 850k per year, so if you put that together you can have 5.8m. We're still short a bit.

Mathematics.

I agree with whoever suggested it's a retirement gig, or a love job. He's not doing it for the cash that's for sure.
 
According to reports his take home pay at NAB was 6.4m per year.

Essendon's cash profit before grants and donations, depreciation and amortisation in 2021 was a touch under 5m. Campbell was reportedly on 850k per year, so if you put that together you can have 5.8m. We're still short a bit.

Mathematics.

I agree with whoever suggested it's a retirement gig, or a love job. He's not doing it for the cash that's for sure.
Banker who is unlikely to be back in banking for a while...if ever.
Would not be surprised to see a move to AFL HQ. Has the pedigree running a large, complex organisation.
Good stepping stone for some of the more optics-based stuff to cut his teeth on.
 
Banker who is unlikely to be back in banking for a while...if ever.
Would not be surprised to see a move to AFL HQ. Has the pedigree running a large, complex organisation.
Good stepping stone for some of the more optics-based stuff to cut his teeth on.
He does some sort of investment banking stuff now. Not the big 4 anymore obviously.
 
I'm not really sure why a CEO at a professional footy club would need to be a person with extensive AFL experience.

You mentioned scale... the bigger the organisation presumably the more you hire underlings you trust and delegate to them. Essendon is tiny compared to a bank with branches all over the country, but it does look like football functions will be put in the hands of a well-qualified GM-Football and Senior Coach, which I suppose is part of the reason we have Brad Scott and not Adem Yze.

What's interesting about Thorburn is he's a banker, and more recently an investment banker. If he's remotely competent he'd have a pretty good idea of what a successful business looks like, either so private equity can invest in it or so a bank can authorise a loan, regardless of what the specific core business is for each one he's investing in.
Richmond - gale
Geelong - cook
Geelong - hocking
Carlton - cook
Sydney - Harley
Brisbane - swan
Melbourne - pert

Hmm is that a trend I see.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He has been involved with the game for a long-time through the NAB partnership of the AFL. He impressed the board with his understanding of the AFL system but also the business of sport on a global scale. Most importantly though, Andrew has demonstrated throughout his business career that he can execute the priorities that the organisation has.
 
Is the President building a wall around the footy department? Will part of Thorburn’s role be to keep the influential club benefactors away from Mahoney and the coaches? The coteries get access to players through sponsorships and arrangements… there’s no stopping that, but there is something to be said for allowing Scott and co to focus on footy.

I eagerly await the “sit down with new CEO” video the media guys will be madly pulling together.
 
Last edited:
By all accounts a pretty decent human. I imagine The RC stuff would speak more to his inability to provide governance than the provision of direct instruction to, for example, charge fees to corpses. He wouldn’t be on his Pat Malone in being unable to be across all aspects of an organisation this size. That’s not to excuse him but I think it reflects as much on the size and structure of the organisation - it would be impossible to be across everything you need to be as CEO.Happy to be told I’m wrong, didn’t follow it closely.

It’s interesting that he’s a total non-footy person yet he is charged with restoring focus on core business, i.e footy. I remain unclear on how a layman can direct and manage a footy department. Can we not find a Gale or Cook who is qualified to manage on and off-field operations?
I think Mahoney and Scott will be running the footy department. One advantage of having Scott as a coach I guess is he has been at AFL house for 3 years so he knows that side as well . He will be supporting what they are doing.
 
I think Mahoney and Scott will be running the footy department. One advantage of having Scott as a coach I guess is he has been at AFL house for 3 years so he knows that side as well . He will be supporting what they are doing.
Right…. But someone has to sign off what they propose. That would be Thorburn.
 
I'm not really sure why a CEO at a professional footy club would need to be a person with extensive AFL experience.

You mentioned scale... the bigger the organisation presumably the more you hire underlings you trust and delegate to them. Essendon is tiny compared to a bank with branches all over the country, but it does look like football functions will be put in the hands of a well-qualified GM-Football and Senior Coach, which I suppose is part of the reason we have Brad Scott and not Adem Yze.

What's interesting about Thorburn is he's a banker, and more recently an investment banker. If he's remotely competent he'd have a pretty good idea of what a successful business looks like, either so private equity can invest in it or so a bank can authorise a loan, regardless of what the specific core business is for each one he's investing in.
Whether it’s a bank or a footy club, your CEO should understand core business.

Somebody has to sign off on whatever Scott and Mahoney propose. Better if they understand footy I’d have thought.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top