JB1975
Brownlow Medallist
I'm starting to regret we can't get Maynard off on a technicality. This is too easy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
you were way off, nearly 100% difference..lolI was close, that's '400' milliseconds more than I thought...
Yep they’re an inevitable. It’s also inevitable the AFL will tinker the rules to limit accidents. Hopefully they at least wait till next season to change this one.No one wants to see anyone concussed but unfortunately it's a part of every contact sport and accidents happen
Maybe Laura Kane, being a Pies supporter, launched the charge, then picked a nuffy who would unintentionally sandbag it? Bloody hell, I shoulda stayed in the game. This is one time I could have actually performed to a client's expectations!Woods arguments are so bizarre I’m starting to think the AFL want Bruzzy to get off. They’re going through the motions just so they can say they did.
Is Woods actually suggesting that in order to classify it as a careless act they need to accept it was “inherently dangerous”? Or am I misunderstanding? Because that is a very small margin of error he’s arguing, IMO.Chair Gleeson says the evidence of a biomechanist says that ther was no time for Maynard to react, and asks if the tribunal accepts this, would that be the end of the matter?
Woods replies that it would, only if they were to not accept the argument that the decision to jump with momentum was "inherently dangerous".
Agree, does that mean that every time someone jumps in the air in the vicinity of another player that it's an inherently dangerous act? Imagine the number of players who not only suffer the embarrassment of being sold some candy, but then get cited for executing an inherently dangerous act?What a ******* dh
I'm starting to regret we can't get Maynard off on a technicality. This is too easy.
Wonder what his take is on Pendles ability to slow time around him. Can we ask him about that?Only Nick Daicos possesses enough fast twitch fibres to react in 400 milliseconds.
Chefs Kiss mmmwaaSo Woods argument that he could/should have braced is dead in the water based of Chef Biomechanist's work.
If she brings up the "vibe" were home hereWoods is going full Dennis Denuto
Maybe that's what the AFL wanted when they sent this to the Tribunal. The clubs are now paying for the experts to tell them the info the AFL needs to cover their arses ..It's a shame that we need to call in a biomechanics prof to repeat what common sense already tells us, but here we are.
I think he just doesn't have a hard on for seeing the game turned into a total farce.Suggesting players should be protected is a troll now?
Why do you have such a hard on to see players concussed?
Every new rule change I hear this complaint yet the fans still stick around.I think he just doesn't have a hard on for seeing the game turned into a total farce.
He's not an expert in wizardryWonder what his take is on Pendles ability to slow time around him. Can we ask him about that?
This is precisely why they referred it. They want these matters tested at a tribunal so that when Brayshaw is 50 and attempts to take the AFL to court for inaction on head trauma they can point to this as taking it seriously.Maybe that's what the AFL wanted when they sent this to the Tribunal. The clubs are now paying for the experts to tell them the info the AFL needs to cover their arses ..