JB1975
Brownlow Medallist
Don't go the early crow my friend.
This is the tribunal version of Tyson blasting Michael Spinks in just over 90 seconds.
The blood is flowing and JB is frothing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Don't go the early crow my friend.
What's a few hundred milliseconds between friends? A millisecond or 400 milliseconds? Pfft.you were way off, nearly 100% difference..lol
AFL actually stated it’s a rare thing. I’m saying that they’ve also shown Maynard could not have anticipated the contact.I feel this hinges on successfully arguing against carelessness.
1. Maynard affected a realistic smother attempt.
2. It is rare that this sort of collision happens, thus Maynard is not expecting the end result.
3. Once airborne there is no time to react to an unexpected situation.
Want a job?I feel this hinges on successfully arguing against carelessness.
1. Maynard affected a realistic smother attempt.
2. It is rare that this sort of collision happens, thus Maynard is not expecting the end result.
3. Once airborne there is no time to react to an unexpected situation.
Wow this shits all over regular TV if so. Should do this every weekTo win the argument’s Woods is now going to try to throw Gleeson’s shoe over the roof of the pub.
Failing that, he will demonstrate a bullet catch to wow the audience.
Didn't N. Riewoldt and J Brown take 2 mark of the year winners running back with the flight of the ball, leaping to mark it on their chest and all the while opponents were rushing at them from the opposite direction?
That could have ended in a similar outcome.
I don't really see the distinction between leaping in desperation to smother a ball and leaping with a desire to mark it.
It was a footy act and an accident.
He's not an expert in wizardry
Will this style hold up in future cases?This is precisely why they referred it. They want these matters tested at a tribunal so that when Brayshaw is 50 and attempts to take the AFL to court for inaction on head trauma they can point to this as taking it seriously.
yes this deals withI feel this hinges on successfully arguing against carelessness.
1. Maynard affected a realistic smother attempt.
2. It is rare that this sort of collision happens, thus Maynard is not expecting the end result.
3. Once airborne there is no time to react to an unexpected situation.
Woods phrasing of "ancient game of footy" is a piss poor attempt to create a narrative and headline in place of any reasonable argument. AFL genuinely amateurish.
Quite happy with my current one! Will accept Maynard getting off, and Brayshaw to suffer no ill effects going forward.Want a job?
View attachment 1801049
C’mon Bruzzy, focus … we don’t need to read that you’ve moved onto picking your nose.
Perhaps says more about how desperately we need entertainment when trapped in the depths of a Melbourne winter. This is a crap charge and Nuffie Woods is making a total goose of himself.Every new rule change I hear this complaint yet the fans still stick around.
And it's perfectly understandable why the new person in the role, ie Laura Kane sent this to the Tribunal. As long as Bruz is cleared, I have no problem with that. Apart from the angst it's caused all of usThis is precisely why they referred it. They want these matters tested at a tribunal so that when Brayshaw is 50 and attempts to take the AFL to court for inaction on head trauma they can point to this as taking it seriously.
View attachment 1801049
C’mon Bruzzy, focus … we don’t need to read that you’ve moved onto picking your nose.
At least that would be under the desk and off cameraEven worse scratching his balls. No one needs to read that.
Should stand on the desk and do it to assert his dominance.At least that would be under the desk and off camera