We could have a long debate about whether the modern game is necessarily that much more complicated and the coaching more complex or whether full-time professionalism and media saturation has just made it appear that way. Certainly David King and Dermie have built their media careers around convincing us that the game is a precise science and mere mortals cannot possibly understand all its intricacies without their expert tuition. And yet time and again the Lions have failed at the very basics, which haven't changed that much if at all over the years. I think you will find that Fagan's initial approach will be to get back to basics, master those, and then move on to the more complex, if necessary.
Definitely agree that Fagan will get us back to basics as he should, we're obviously failing at the fundamentals. And that there is nothing that Dermie and King could comprehend that the general public would struggle with, and also agree that it would be a long debate on whether coaching complexity has increased over time, so I'm not really planning to get into it now. But personally, as an aside, I'm of the view that with the introduction of new computer technologies (Chamption Data analysis), sport technology (GPS tech ect), more full time roles, more complex rules blah blah etc that coaching has evolved significantly since the 70's and become far more in depth.
But all that aside, my point was simply that I have no problem whatsoever with coaches coaching different areas of the ground from where they may have played their footy in.