Brodie Grundy's tackle- what's the verdict?

Should Brodie Grundy be suspended for his tackle on ben brown?

  • No

    Votes: 119 73.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 44 27.0%

  • Total voters
    163

Remove this Banner Ad

Brodie Grundy, Collingwood, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Ben Brown, North Melbourne, during the second quarter of the Round 20 match between Collingwood and North Melbourne, played at Etihad Stadium on Saturday August 5, 2017.

In summary, he can accept a two-match sanction with an early plea.

Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from North Melbourne Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with high impact to the head. The incident was classified as a three-match sanction. The player has no applicable record with impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a two-match sanction.

I can't believe that's a 3 weeks incident. Unbelievable. May as well not tackle anymore as there's going to be accidents and you're going to get rubbed out for it. So Danger gets 1 yet Grundy gets 2. AFL is a joke. Be consistent flogs.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

He's gone unfortunately. I didn't mind the tackle itself but the AFL looks to punish based on the end result rather than the action itself. If Brown had jumped upright after the tackle Grundy might get away with it, but the fact he had no idea what was going on is going to hurt Grundy's chances of getting away with this one.
 
Ziebell slings Treloar. Treloar is ok. Not even looked at.

Brodie Grundy does the same thing. Injured Brown. Two match suspension.

Suspensions based on outcome rather than the act.

Spot In. It what happened after instead of how it Happened
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I understood he'd get a week but WTF.3 down to 2.

what about the flog cunnignton for knocking goldy out? nothing? they are a joke.

Zeibell intent to dump treloar on his head and gets off because Treloar didn't get stretchered off.
Instead he got up a bit groggy brushing his head then spent a fair bit of time on the pine straight after.

The rules have become a joke.
 
Realistically it was never going to be 1 week. If it was deemed a reportable offence the fact that Brown missed the entire game meant it had to be high impact - which is 3 down to 2.

If we challenge we have to prove it isn't a reportable offence, which given the current climate on pinning the arms seems difficult to do.

Kreuzer missed the entire game.
 
Realistically it was never going to be 1 week. If it was deemed a reportable offence the fact that Brown missed the entire game meant it had to be high impact - which is 3 down to 2.

If we challenge we have to prove it isn't a reportable offence, which given the current climate on pinning the arms seems difficult to do.

Can challenge on multiple grounds.
 
I do agree we should challenge as its a bullshit decision and who cares if he misses the final game of this season.

Won't make Finals. So IF he gets 3 weeks. He can get a Early Start on Getting Ready for the 2018 Season
 
Kreuzer missed the entire game.
And by the current standards, that should've been high impact too. I've never seen concussion graded medium. I'm guessing they thought Dangerfield's tackle was 'worth a week' so they adjusted it accordingly.

In any case there clearly need to be better-defined guidelines on these tackles as it's just pot luck at the moment - no better case than Ziebell on Treloar which wasn't even assessed due there not being an injury.
 
And by the current standards, that should've been high impact too. I've never seen concussion graded medium. I'm guessing they thought Dangerfield's tackle was 'worth a week' so they adjusted it accordingly.

In any case there clearly need to be better-defined guidelines on these tackles as it's just pot luck at the moment - no better case than Ziebell on Treloar which wasn't even assessed due there not being an injury.

AFL Dangerfield but Hate Collingwood
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Brodie Grundy's tackle- what's the verdict?

Back
Top