Updated Bruce Lehrmann * Justice Lee - "Mr Lehrmann r*ped Ms Higgins."

[Kurve]

Historical Rape Allegation Against Fmr AG Christian Porter
The Alexander Matters matters

Just a reminder, this is the crime board and we need to be aware that there will be victims of crime either watching this thread or engaging in here from time to time. A degree of respect in all discussions is expected.

LINK TO TIMELINE
CJS INQUIRY
FINAL REPORT – BOARD OF INQUIRY – CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Joint media statement – Chief Minister and Attorney-General

LINK TO FEDERAL COURT DEFAMATION PROCEEDINGS

 

[Percel]

Woah, this is pretty emotional, tough listen

 

[jason_recliner]

Anybody still not believe her????

 

[Satan]

Brave

 

[faible]

This line of questioning seems real weird -

'use the exact words you used to Ms Brown'

'no no don't explain it, the exact words as though you're talking to her'

 

[insanity]

Woah, this is pretty emotional, tough listen

I've had to stop to take my son to a psychologist appointment. I've paused so I can continue. I'm up to them just entering Parliament House and I'm already heartbroken for her.

 

[Toump Ass]

Where dat live link at ploise

 

[faible]

Where dat live link at ploise

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[Toump Ass]

Anybody still not believe her????

For me there's a few bits and pieces that don't add up. Sorry.

 

[Gavin Excell]

She will be subject to a depressingly ugly cross examination I fear

 

[Sqotty from office works]

She will be subject to a depressingly ugly cross examination I fear

As should be expected in court

 

[faible]

For me there's a few bits and pieces that don't add up. Sorry.

Such as?

Also remember she was absolutely hammered so you'd expect there to be gaps and a level of vagueness.

 

[Punt rd end]

For me there's a few bits and pieces that don't add up. Sorry.

Like what?

 

[Punt rd end]

Her story has been consistent, unlike his with lies all over the place

 

[jason_recliner]

Her story has been consistent

No, it hasn't. That is probably one reason there was not a unanimous verdict.

 

[Xtreme]

Anybody still not believe her????

Yep!

 

[Punt rd end]

No, it hasn't. That is probably one reason there was not a unanimous verdict.

It was a miss trial due to a juror ****ing up

 

[Ghost Patrol]

No, it hasn't. That is probably one reason there was not a unanimous verdict.

There was no verdict due to misconduct of one juror.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Yep!

You have a history of siding with compulsive liars. I think your radar is broken.

 

[FIGJAM]

It was a miss trial due to a juror ******* up

They "****ed up" because it was tending towards a hung jury and one juror got desperate enough to bring in third party info in false rape accusations.

As big a train wreck as Bruce's testimony has been, people shouldn't forget that Brittany's cross examination in the criminal trial brought up a heap of inconsistencies, to the point of some even being clearly lies.

Whilst I am of the view that she was probably the victim of a serial pest, this might have been the better approach:

Tuesday, February 2
* Ms Higgins records an interview with Lisa Wilkinson for The Project.

Wednesday, January 27
* Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz meet with The Project journalist Lisa Wilkinson and a producer in Sydney.

Thursday, February 4
* Ms Higgins contacts the AFP to reopen her police complaint.

Tuesday, March 16
* Ms Higgins is offered a book deal worth $325,000 about her experiences.

Monday, April 19
* Lehrmann is interviewed by police.

 

[faible]

They "****ed up" because it was tending towards a hung jury and one juror got desperate enough to bring in third party info in false rape accusations.

As big a train wreck as Bruce's testimony has been, people shouldn't forget that Brittany's cross examination in the criminal trial brought up a heap of inconsistencies, to the point of some even being clearly lies.

Whilst I am of the view that she was probably the victim of a serial pest, this might have been the better approach:

Tuesday, February 2
* Ms Higgins records an interview with Lisa Wilkinson for The Project.

Wednesday, January 27
* Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz meet with The Project journalist Lisa Wilkinson and a producer in Sydney.

Thursday, February 4
* Ms Higgins contacts the AFP to reopen her police complaint.

Tuesday, March 16
* Ms Higgins is offered a book deal worth $325,000 about her experiences.

Monday, April 19
* Lehrmann is interviewed by police.

?

The Bruce Lehrmann And Brittany Higgins Timeline Of Events: What Happened When?

A timeline of every major moment of the Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann saga, from the start of the story to now.

www.pedestrian.tv

April 2019​

Higgins goes to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) with her accusation against Lehrmann.

Later that month, Higgins drops her complaint and stops the AFP ‘s investigation, citing fears that making the report would be damaging for her employment

So she appears to have been pressured to drop her complaint, then eventually picks it back up when she's no longer working there?

This isn't really the slamdunk argument people seem to think it is...

 

[Aristotle Pickett]

Yep!

Do you always take the side of alleged rapists?

 

[FIGJAM]

So she appears to have been pressured to drop her complaint, then eventually picks it back up when she's no longer working there?

Her dropping the allegations and picking it up again isn't my point. The way she went about it through the media and with monetisation in her sights, however, most certainly is.

 

[faible]

Her dropping the allegations and picking it up again isn't my point. The way she went about it through the media and with monetisation in her sights, however, most certainly is.

The system had already failed her once; she'd gone to the AFP and been pressured to drop her complaint to protect her career.

Is it all that surprising that her first port of call wasn't necessarily approaching the AFP again?

 

[jason_recliner]

There was no verdict due to misconduct of one juror.

Yeah but there was not a unanimous verdict amongst the jury at that point. With the testimony she has just given, if she had also been completely consistent and honest in her claims, I can't imagine anybody would not believe her.

 

[jason_recliner]

The system had already failed her once; she'd gone to the AFP and been pressured to drop her complaint to protect her career.

Is it all that surprising that her first port of call wasn't necessarily approaching the AFP again?

What is the evidence that she was pressured to drop her complaint?