- Oct 2, 2014
- 1,332
- 2,723
- AFL Club
- Richmond
The preparation Bruce put into his craft was a testament to his professionalism. From personal backstory, professional journey, and correct/preferred pronunciation of names - Bruce displayed what a professional sports caller, rather than an enthusiastic ex-athlete who makes commentary about themselves rather than the game, looks like.
His late career style was again an approach of a true professional. Early commentators were born out of the radio era, where the commentator had to ‘paint a picture’ for the listener. The modern televised sports commentator should provide an insight to the game, rather than a ‘play-by-play’ call. What is referred to as ‘colour’ commentary and ‘play-by-play’ is being replaced by professional, technical sports commentary. Bruce moved away from the ‘play-by-play’ to attempts at technical insight.
Bruce was a professional with a long career and improved the game.
I really struggle to understand this take of Bruce - have you actually been listening to him over the past 10 years or are you blinded by "Sydney 2000" nostalgia?
He was technically terrible and incredibly one-dimensional. For instance, every second phrase from him was a rhetorical question - surely a true professional would not overuse this 'gimmick' and provide a bit more variety to their call?
Then there was all the moaning and groaning over his "favourites" like Cyril and Dusty. He just came across like a complete amateur who only knew the stars of the game and lacked deeper knowledge of the lesser players.
The absolute worst thing about him though was his use of phrases like "delicious" and "you'd love to be tackled by him" - I mean who can honestly listen to that without cringing? He sounds like a complete creep.
The game is a better place with Bruce not in it.