Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
100% correct. As a coach, i tell my players to tackle the ball carrier and attempt to bring them to the ground. Th bump is only to be used when shepherding or in a 1 on 1 ball-get contest. Franklin went the soft option i.e. it is easier to bump than tackle and got what he deserved. I think that deep down, Clarkson would be very disappointed in Franklins choice of tactics in that contest, I know as a coach myself that I would.
It's unfortunate hits like this are gone but sniping at the bottom of packs is allowed (I'm looking at you Rance you dog).
They meant within the context of the situation, but you're right, it was a weak and desperate defence, reflective of the verdict.i still cant see how that defence could even be thought of
Cousins was in possession of the ball, why couldnt he be tackled
i still cant see how that defence could even be thought of
Cousins was in possession of the ball, why couldnt he be tackled
They could of thought of a much better and more realistic defence then cousins wasnt in complete possession of the ball so he cant be tackledThey meant within the context of the situation, but you're right, it was a weak and desperate defence, reflective of the verdict.
if you read my long post in this thread you will find i dont actually agree with the suspensionAmazing to see how many Essendon & Collingwood supporters agree with the decision...yet almost every other teams supporters are outraged!!!
Yet another disgraceful decision.
if you read my long post in this thread you will find i dont actually agree with the suspensionAmazing to see how many Essendon & Collingwood supporters agree with the decision...yet almost every other teams supporters are outraged!!!
Yet another disgraceful decision.
I agree with you to an extent. This ruling however has just shown up what a stupid rule is in place.
And now, that wasn't the basis of Hawthorn's defence . . .Hawthorn went to the tribunal with the defence that the tackle was not a reasonable option.
Stop trolling.
Couldn’t happen to a bigger **** the thug deserves all he got. Hope he will learn from this. Mad Wednesday comes early for Buddy
That's the thing: There isn't any other credible back up. It directly conflicts with the new rule.They could of thought of a much better and more realistic defence then cousins wasnt in complete possession of the ball so he cant be tackled
What a load of cr#p
the reason he didn't tackle was due to the fact that had he tackled the umps would have most likely pinged him for too high or some other ridiculous decision that he has copped this year
players are instructed to bump players who have "disposed" of the ball to impede their run...last time i checked this was legal but who knows for how long...they'll probably bring in an "obstruction rule" like in soccer
f#ck you afl...you're killing the game
player haters
Under the rules he was gone. Under the precedent set this year he was gone.
How are people not getting this? Unless they whinge about the rule itself, which may be fair game, but people forget also that Cousins got a concussion (and is still in doubt for next weekend). I don't like the rule personally, but it's a fair rule.