How can we take someone seriously who joined in 04 with the name blues for flag. What a joke.
In hindsight, maybe it wasn't the best name.
But it'll be relevant soon enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
How can we take someone seriously who joined in 04 with the name blues for flag. What a joke.
I have looked at them. One is not even an AFL game. One is a regulation chest mark against Adelaide, so well done there. They are single incidents in single games. And none of it is that good anyway. So maybe come back to me when you've got something a bit better than that poor attempt.
One mark and two goals. Wow. Stop the press. The dud actually was seen taking a mark and getting a kick in a game. Care to show me any games where he's actually had a significant effect on the game? That's what I'm talking about.What about the other two? You said he hadn't done anything and yet there he is taking a fantastic mark, and in another kicking multiple goals against a Premiership captain.
You = Owned
Admit it.
One mark and two goals. Wow. Stop the press. The dud actually was seen taking a mark and getting a kick in a game. Care to show me any games where he's actually had a significant effect on the game? That's what I'm talking about.
And you won't be able to, because he has never influenced one game that he has played.
Mitch Clarke has actually looked impressive. He kicked 5 goals against us in a dominant performance.Had 10 disposals, 8 marks and a goal in his second game against the Bulldogs and similar games against Melbourne and the Kangaroos.
Had a 11 disposal, 8 mark and two goal game against Essendon, and kicked another two against Geelong.
Had a 15 disposal, 7 marks, 7 hitout game against Brisbane.
Good stats for a young CHF.
You claimed that Mitch Clarke has shown far more yet he's had one good game against Collingwood where he bagged five goals and almost nothing in any other games. And I'm certain he's had double the game time Kennedy got under Pagan.
You = Owned
I think anyone but the stubborn, arrogant carlton supporters would.I'd take Clark > Kennedy
I think anyone but the stubborn, arrogant carlton supporters would.
This is exactly why Carlton have been so bad lately. They have not lost their arrogance. Heads should have rolled at Carlton after Kennedy was taken at 4. A complete and utter waste of a pick. But no, instead of carlton people demanding answers from their recruiting staff, they try and defend the player and make him out to be something that he isn't.
An open and honest review of the whole football club, without stubborness and arrogance getting in the way, is what is required at Carlton.
I think anyone but the stubborn, arrogant carlton supporters would.
This is exactly why Carlton have been so bad lately. They have not lost their arrogance. Heads should have rolled at Carlton after Kennedy was taken at 4. A complete and utter waste of a pick. But no, instead of carlton people demanding answers from their recruiting staff, they try and defend the player and make him out to be something that he isn't.
An open and honest review of the whole football club, without stubborness and arrogance getting in the way, is what is required at Carlton.
Josh Fraser has been in the game for years and he is still the biggest dud taken at #1 ever
No, I'm pretty sure Michael Gardiner gets that mantle.
Also .... I see Kennedy play, sure he has good hands, sure he is huge .. but what else? What really justifies him being taken at #4, Clark on the other hand, good hands, pretty huge himself, but he also has pace for someone as big as he is ...
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?tid1=20&pid1=1615&tid2=4&pid2=1610
those stats speak for themselves.
Keep clutching at straws.Do they tell you the time on ground?
You would really hope he does get traded somewhere, because he will feel totally unwanted if he is still at Carlton next year.
yr12/VCE would be during the season - unless he was injured he would definitely have done the preseason (november-feb) - schools out during that time.
Think the injury you refer to was the shoulder at the end of 06 - I've no idea how serious it was but if it impacted, it would have affected this years preseason
yr12/VCE would be during the season - unless he was injured he would definitely have done the preseason (november-feb) - schools out during that time.
Think the injury you refer to was the shoulder at the end of 06 - I've no idea how serious it was but if it impacted, it would have affected this years preseason
Dale Thomas board.
A bad haircut can get some pretty wild reviews these days.
No, I'm pretty sure Michael Gardiner gets that mantle.
Amen! By the way, does anyone have Kennedy's stats for 2007? You know, just so we have a form guide
doesn't matter what he's done at carlton........west coast and carlton can swap their entire lists, and west coast will still be a better football team. that's the business they're in.........i don't know what Carlton do these days.
doesn't matter what he's done at carlton........west coast and carlton can swap their entire lists, and west coast will still be a better football team. that's the business they're in.........i don't know what Carlton do these days.