Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(To my understanding) A very good marker of the footy, something that was also demonstrated in a small sample size when he was sub. However, has some serious yips once he marks it in scoring distance: 6.11 in 6 games for Peel (and I recall a few non-scoring shots too). Idk how his field kicking is outside scoring range, but he can also tend to make iffy reads when passing up a shot (probably because of said yips). Accuracy was also an area of inconsistency at AFL level, but I don't think quite as bad as it has been for Peel.Hows Corbett been for peel? I thought he shown enough during that game he was sub.
Hope so...With Aish out I wonder if Worner finally gets a shot
The day Sam Sturt wins a Normie is the day I buy a liquor store and gift it to you. You can bookmark that.
Does anyone know if footy clubs get access to additional footage outside the tv cast? I only go to a game every now and then but you really do get 10 times the information on watching players if you watch them live compared to TV. Clubs have to get extra info right because TV footage doesnt tell you much on how a player actually performed.
I'd be in a minority of die hard losers but I'd pay money to get access to like a F50 camera to really be able to watch the little things forwards or backs do.
yep clubs at the very least get access to behind the goals footageDoes anyone know if footy clubs get access to additional footage outside the tv cast? I only go to a game every now and then but you really do get 10 times the information on watching players if you watch them live compared to TV. Clubs have to get extra info right because TV footage doesnt tell you much on how a player actually performed.
I'd be in a minority of die hard losers but I'd pay money to get access to like a F50 camera to really be able to watch the little things forwards or backs do.
6 frees for, 8 frees against and 6 goal assists for the year so far. Those numbers need to change.Anyone Think that Michael Frederick will be dropped vs the Giants... Unlikely.
Yep he had a poor game.... 5 kicks and 1 hand pass.
The bloke has kicked 14 goals and 6 behinds this season and 28 goals and 14 behinds last season.
I have a feeling he will get 12-15 disposals and kick 2 or 3 goals
Bansturt be better lolOoooooo, we gotta make "Sturtfield" a thing. That's catchy.
Does anyone know if footy clubs get access to additional footage outside the tv cast? I only go to a game every now and then but you really do get 10 times the information on watching players if you watch them live compared to TV. Clubs have to get extra info right because TV footage doesnt tell you much on how a player actually performed.
I'd be in a minority of die hard losers but I'd pay money to get access to like a F50 camera to really be able to watch the little things forwards or backs do.
Probably is. Didn't he start the injury with a quad injury or something? Probably still playing with itAnyone get the feeling Freddy played injured?
As in a pearl beyond price?Although, if one of them is Sturts ‘s mum and the other one Banfield’s dad, then maybe they should quite literally get a room? In 20 years time we might have the best of both rolled into one !!!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Having seen him play a bit at Peel your assessment is spot on , he is a good mark for his size but has a bad case of the yips Maybe a move to the back line is the answer(To my understanding) A very good marker of the footy, something that was also demonstrated in a small sample size when he was sub. However, has some serious yips once he marks it in scoring distance: 6.11 in 6 games for Peel (and I recall a few non-scoring shots too). Idk how his field kicking is outside scoring range, but he can also tend to make iffy reads when passing up a shot (probably because of said yips). Accuracy was also an area of inconsistency at AFL level, but I don't think quite as bad as it has been for Peel.
Runs hard and plays above his size, so could be one that can come in, know his role and help the team. Wouldn't count on him to stay in the team though.
Except when Freddy and Treacy have 2 touches, they're usually described as the best 2 disposal games ever.I know you're both number 1 supporters of each player but I dont think you're doing yourself any favours trying to justify ya boys 2 disposal game as anything other than terrible. Got to take the loss on this one
You stick to your guns. After all Baghdad Bob gained a global following back in 2003 doing just that.Whether that's the case or not, I don't see how that prevents me from commenting how I wish and copping insults from it
Saying banners would of been handy in the 4th quarter when their defense was starting to intercept those marks is reasonable. Didn't say he necessarily could of though.
If someone does not like my comment they can ignore it. Not post an insult. I don't go around doing that and I expect the same
2 games? I thought JL was positive it was only one on 360 Monday night?So Aish out for 2 games.
Surely a good opportunity to let Worner have a real crack.
Thought the tribunal evidence was 2?2 games? I thought JL was positive it was only one on 360 Monday night?
There are no tanks........You stick to your guns. After all Baghdad Bob gained a global following back in 2003 doing just that.
Just like the best game of Logue's career when buddy kicked 6 on him.Except when Freddy and Treacy have 2 touches, they're usually described as the best 2 disposal games ever.
On Pixel 4a using BigFooty.com mobile app
I assume maybe the mix up is the 12 day period? I haven't seen the tribunal stuff so don't know but I'm thinking it's the 12 day period which is 2 weeks but he will actually be available for the game?Thought the tribunal evidence was 2?