El Doederino
Norm Smith Medallist
- Apr 22, 2018
- 6,377
- 13,783
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Nek Minnit - Peter Malinauskas & Hitaf Rasheed announce a new one-off $100k grant to Port through Events SA to host a Sam Smith concert.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pissweak given we copped $50K for Tex having his mask down a plane, but ultimately, I'm not surprised.
You don't have to accept that the doctor was influenced by the club, just that it's a perception, something people could reasonably infer.Independent doctors shouldn’t make a difference. The Port doctor made a mistake. Independent doctors make mistakes.
You would only advocate for independent doctors if you accepted that ports doctor was influenced by the club.
Only means something if you are already at 100% of the cap.The problem with fines as a penalty is that apart from the soft-cap fines, it's all monopoly money that goes around in circles.
The 2023 soft cap is $7.2 million such that $50k amounts to a .7% reduction in the soft cap arising from this fine.
While it's hard to work out what the "right" punishment in terms of soft cap is (particularly given the offence their punishing could make it counter-productive if clubs can employ less doctors etc). I would have thought if the entire $100,000 was in the soft cap, being approx 1.4% it might feel about right.
Only means something if you are already at 100% of the cap.
I doubt Port are.
AFL will just contra the fine with an increase in Port's funding.
The amount of money is headline grabbing. But in reality won't affect Port at all.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
You don't have to accept that the doctor was influenced by the club, just that it's a perception, something people could reasonably infer.
It's why, for example, the English FA has barred certain referees with known club allegiances from reffing games involving "their" club. They're not implying that the ref would be biased, just that it removes the perception of bias from the equation.
Yes, as others have said, the AFL effectively ends up paying the fine. Here's what's not clear to me:That's a welfare club punishment
$50,000 of the fine will be included in Port Adelaide's football department soft cap, with the remainder to sit outside the cap unless the club commits a similar breach of concussion protocols before the end of the AFL and AFLW seasons in 2024.
Only means something if you are already at 100% of the cap.
I doubt Port are.
AFL will just contra the fine with an increase in Port's funding.
The amount of money is headline grabbing. But in reality won't affect Port at all.
The real message is that the AFL does not care about concussion enough to truly sanction a club if it breaches, for a second offence.
Yep.The real message is that the AFL does not care about concussion enough to truly sanction a club if it breaches, for a second offence.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Craig McCrae appears to have some integrity though. GF or not, I couldn't see Collingwood pull off a move like that. They are a much better run club than Port with much higher standards both on-field and off-field.Yep.
Just imagine if Nick Daicos cops a head knock early on in a GF. Collingwood would be better off continuing to play him without doing the assessment. A fine is nothing if it helps you win a flag.
But Tex could have killed thousands of people.Pissweak given we copped $50K for Tex having his mask down a plane, but ultimately, I'm not surprised.
It fits perfectly with the majority of their supporters.That's a welfare club punishment