Thoughts on this incident?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's Langdon...he'll get a fine or a week.
worth it to let mundy know he was alive after he was getting into our kids.
That's Langdon...
Umpire was right there saw the whole thing. Masten got a free. nuff said.
Thoughts on this incident?
Put the pipe down mateFour elbows, two punches and none of them anywhere near the ball. Six weeks. The bloke has form and was convicted after a punch up at the 2008 fireworks. Deadshit.
Umpire was right there saw the whole thing. Masten got a free. nuff said.
Umpire was right there saw the whole thing. Masten got a free. nuff said.
Did you forget to log out of your alts?
FYI he got the free after this incident when Fremantle players reacted and slung Masten to the ground.
Chris Masten, West Coast, has been charged with misconduct against Ed Langdon, Fremantle, during the fourth quarter of the Round Six match between West Coast and Fremantle, played at Optus Stadium on Sunday April 28, 2018.
In summary, he can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.
Misconduct is fixed financial sanction of $2500. The player can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.
Gets sanctioned by the MRP, but gets a free kick from the umps in the same incident.
Me thinks something is wrong here.
Your interpretation of what happened is what's wrong.
The incident occurred, in demonstrating with him Duman pulled him off after it and threw him to the ground giving away a free kick.
The free kick was for the aftermath, not for the incident.
The retaliation by Duman was what the free was for, agreed.
The problem I have is that a reportable incident has occurred, players come in to remonstrate ( natural team reaction ) and the umps pay a free for Masten being slung out.
I have no problems Masten getting a free if he was given a “good thumping”, but giving kicks after remonstrating over a reportable incident with a bit of push and shove is poor umpiring. I’m not too sure if Langdon had actually been granted a free kick in the first incident.
Report a player, then they get a free for players remonstrating with them, do you think that is right ?. Over umpiring / losing control of the game ?.
he's a blind as the umpire who made that decisionThat's Langdon...
he didn't see a lot of thingsIt's possible the ump just didn't see it.
We had the benefit of a low camera angle from inside the 50, the ump can be seen running into frame from somewhere near the centre of the ground so who knows what he saw?
The umps don't get the benefit of multiple camera angles and slow motion replays viewers do.
he didn't see a lot of things
All 3 umps? I find that very difficult to believe. It's not like it was 50m off the ball, split-second incident.It's possible the ump just didn't see it.