Current Claremont Murders Discussion & Edwards trial updates pt4 - Beyond the Verdict

[Kurve]

Here is
- Claremont Murders - Part One and Part Two and Part 3
- Media
- The Bunker

• Hey Bret? Stalking Claremont the book.
• Justice Hall's Decision 619 pgs

 

[Frankie1972]

How's the Edwards family going (assuming you know)?

(Make sure you don't break the rules of this forum thread when/if replying to this)

TE is well lots of fishing in Broome

 

[Frankie1972]

Hi Frankie, what's happening?

Just living the life in Broome

 

[metic]

I just watched this and saw previously unseen persons, photos & footage.
has this been seen on here before?



Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[metic]

Found old footage uploaded 5 days ago
with Con Bayens interview and more



Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[metic]

There he is, (old half face)
seen in this recent flick at 13.09 min.
will be interesting to find out where this identikit came from one day. this is still a good question that's unanswered. what incident and who was the victim who had to help create this identikit?

 

[Krusty Crab]

There he is, (old half face)
seen in this recent flick at 13.09 min.
will be interesting to find out where this identikit came from one day. this is still a good question that's unanswered. what incident and who was the victim who had to help create this identikit?

any idea what year the back ground or that image possibly surfaced? wondering if it might have been an identikit from the karakatta victim? if i recall one of the case reviews pointed to that crime and said it would be linked. either that or an identikit relative to the telstra living witness project.

If either holds true though there is an issue at play for each consideration:

if its an identikit from karakkata, then with a focus on that case it looks like little effort was put into researching other crimes in the area, checking for sexual overtones in those cases and examining any suspects from those cases.

if its an identikit from the telstra living witness project, was the sketch ever showed to telstra workers or compared to telstra ID photos? i dont recall hearing anything about that happening, either from prosecution saying BRE was identified during the trial, or defense saying no identification was made.

other options are that its not an indentikit image - its a photo of one of the other suspects that Caporn got fixated on, and having it show up in the video was a power move against a suspect to stress them out. or photo of one of the burger boys/person who found the body/taxi driver that couldnt find SS etc.

 

[BonzaRam]

any idea what year the back ground or that image possibly surfaced? wondering if it might have been an identikit from the karakatta victim? if i recall one of the case reviews pointed to that crime and said it would be linked. either that or an identikit relative to the telstra living witness project.

If either holds true though there is an issue at play for each consideration:

if its an identikit from karakkata, then with a focus on that case it looks like little effort was put into researching other crimes in the area, checking for sexual overtones in those cases and examining any suspects from those cases.

if its an identikit from the telstra living witness project, was the sketch ever showed to telstra workers or compared to telstra ID photos? i dont recall hearing anything about that happening, either from prosecution saying BRE was identified during the trial, or defense saying no identification was made.

other options are that its not an indentikit image - its a photo of one of the other suspects that Caporn got fixated on, and having it show up in the video was a power move against a suspect to stress them out. or photo of one of the burger boys/person who found the body/taxi driver that couldnt find SS etc.

That particular background board was discussed quite a bit on here in Part1 -

Current - Claremont Murders Discussion & Edwards trial updates

Still looks fake to me. No pins or anything holding the paper to the board and the name plaque looks like an image edit added afterwards and if that is the size of the text on the enlarged version it would be tiny at the original size... the whole thing looks two dimensional instead of 3d...

www.bigfooty.com

 

[metic]

That particular background board was discussed quite a bit on here in Part1 -

Current - Claremont Murders Discussion & Edwards trial updates

Still looks fake to me. No pins or anything holding the paper to the board and the name plaque looks like an image edit added afterwards and if that is the size of the text on the enlarged version it would be tiny at the original size... the whole thing looks two dimensional instead of 3d...

www.bigfooty.com

clicked on that link, took me to someone commented claiming they saw the whole face , that's incorrect. i think the commenter imagined the wrong picture, there is no full face of that one.
Also there was the identikit pictures of two guys who wanted for a rape. these guys are totally separate and are not related to the half face.
I have no doubts that half face is BEdwards
and so are 2 other identikit pictures seen in these threads

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[metic]

any idea what year the back ground or that image possibly surfaced? wondering if it might have been an identikit from the karakatta victim? if i recall one of the case reviews pointed to that crime and said it would be linked. either that or an identikit relative to the telstra living witness project.

If either holds true though there is an issue at play for each consideration:

if its an identikit from karakkata, then with a focus on that case it looks like little effort was put into researching other crimes in the area, checking for sexual overtones in those cases and examining any suspects from those cases.

if its an identikit from the telstra living witness project, was the sketch ever showed to telstra workers or compared to telstra ID photos? i dont recall hearing anything about that happening, either from prosecution saying BRE was identified during the trial, or defense saying no identification was made.

other options are that its not an indentikit image - its a photo of one of the other suspects that Caporn got fixated on, and having it show up in the video was a power move against a suspect to stress them out. or photo of one of the burger boys/person who found the body/taxi driver that couldnt find SS etc.

it is an identikit not a photo

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[FTY1]

clicked on that link, took me to someone commented claiming they saw the whole face , that's incorrect. i think the commenter imagined the wrong picture, there is no full face of that one.
Also there was the identikit pictures of two guys who wanted for a rape. these guys are totally separate and are not related to the half face.
I have no doubts that half face is BEdwards
and so are 2 other identikit pictures seen in these threads

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

There was a full face picture of the Church Lane attack victim which I am sure we have discussed before has similar hair amd eyebrows to the identicate picture behind.

 

[CaseyJones]

I have finally found time to post the entire workings of what i will name The BESK Pattern.
The 'Bradley Edwards Serial Killer Pattern'.
The first pic was posted some weeks ago, the new ones depict how it all lines up and points exactly to the body positions of jane and kiara, with exactly the same method pointing to sarah and his house, as at 1997 on the same line
9th june.
Remember the order of when they went missing, including Sarah Lee Davey 14th january and Peta Webber 22nd june.
27, 9, 14, 15, 22.
This is important in understanding how it works from the first pic as each date on the circle points to the victim preceding that date, or previous victim. After the first pic, where the circle is on the city GPO, the next pics show the circle on the victims positions.
Now the method changes, so 'eg', circle on jane, you look at 27, 9, 14. 9 points to 14, 14 to 9 and 27 to itself.
9 crosses the line from the gpo, where 15 pointed to 14. This is the spot for 14.
27 crosses the line from gpo, where 9 pointed to 27.
So we have 9 to 14, 14 to 9, 27 to itself. Same when the circle is on 14, using the two dates, one before which is 9, one after which is 15.
Hit me up if its confusing, good luck !

 

[CaseyJones]

The original posting. 22nd to CG, 14th to JR, 9th to BRE's house which is also the direction for SS, though not at his house.

 

[CaseyJones]

Circle on JR. When the circle is placed on a body position, in this case JR - 9th.Two dates either side of the ninth, which are 27th and 14th, are significant. Now there are 27th 9th 14th in order of when they went missing. 9th still points to the GPO.
You have 9 pointing to 14, 14 to 9 and 27 to itself.

 

[CaseyJones]

Circle on SLD, where the two lines cross from the gpo and JR's position. This is where 9, in pic 2, crosses the line from the GPO, 15 to the prior victim, 14.
Same scenario, circle on 14, date prior 9, date after 15. You have 9, 14, 15. 14 point to the next victim ( ciara ), 15 back to the GPO and 9 back to itself ( jane ).

 

[CaseyJones]

Circle on CG

 

[CaseyJones]

Circle on JR, take her date and the one before and the one after.
14 points to 9, 9 to 14, 27 to its location.
Circle on SLD '14'.
14points to 15, 15 to 14, 9 to its location.
Circle on CG, 15 to 22, 22 to 15, 14 to its location.

 

[Kurve]

Circle on JR, take her date and the one before and the one after.
14 points to 9, 9 to 14, 27 to its location.
Circle on SLD '14'.
14points to 15, 15 to 14, 9 to its location.
Circle on CG, 15 to 22, 22 to 15, 14 to its location.

So where is Sarah?

 

[Awakening]

Completely confused. Can you do an x marks the spot on google maps?

 

[jason_recliner]

Completely confused. Can you do an x marks the spot on google maps?

Glad it's not just me. Who are the people in the ocean?

If you could go out and find SS that would go a long way to supporting the soundness of your theory.

 

[CaseyJones]

I did say that with the first pic, each date on the circle points to the previous victim. So in this case, 9 is pointing in the direction of sarah, which also points to his house.
With the second pic, as i said, 9 to 14, 14 to 9, 27 to itself, so 27 crosses 9 at ferndale.
You have an X.

 

[CaseyJones]

The one position off freo harbour is Sarah Lee Davey, where 15th points to her date the 14th in the first pic and where the 9th crosses it, as shown in the second pic.
Note that in all of the pics, the circle does not revolve, it stays with the 14th pointing north at all times. So in the third pic, you can see 14 pointing to ciara, crossing the exact spot where she was found, forming an X with the line 22nd from the first pic.
When the circle is on a body position, that date points forward to the next victim.

 

[Awakening]

I did say that with the first pic, each date on the circle points to the previous victim. So in this case, 9 is pointing in the direction of sarah, which also points to his house.
With the second pic, as i said, 9 to 14, 14 to 9, 27 to itself, so 27 crosses 9 at ferndale.
You have an X.

Thanks for explaining but I still don't understand.

I'm only on my first coffee and maps and maths are not a strength of mine.

I can't see the numbers 9 or 14 on what you've posted but will save the photos and zoom in.

But your theory is he very deliberately buried victims based on where he previously buried one?

 

[Awakening]

I have finally found time to post the entire workings of what i will name The BESK Pattern.
The 'Bradley Edwards Serial Killer Pattern'.
The first pic was posted some weeks ago, the new ones depict how it all lines up and points exactly to the body positions of jane and kiara, with exactly the same method pointing to sarah and his house, as at 1997 on the same line
9th june.
Remember the order of when they went missing, including Sarah Lee Davey 14th january and Peta Webber 22nd june.
27, 9, 14, 15, 22.
This is important in understanding how it works from the first pic as each date on the circle points to the victim preceding that date, or previous victim. After the first pic, where the circle is on the city GPO, the next pics show the circle on the victims positions.
Now the method changes, so 'eg', circle on jane, you look at 27, 9, 14. 9 points to 14, 14 to 9 and 27 to itself.
9 crosses the line from the gpo, where 15 pointed to 14. This is the spot for 14.
27 crosses the line from gpo, where 9 pointed to 27.
So we have 9 to 14, 14 to 9, 27 to itself. Same when the circle is on 14, using the two dates, one before which is 9, one after which is 15.
Hit me up if its confusing, good luck !

Ah just found this post of yours which hopefully will help me

 

[metic]

There was a full face picture of the Church Lane attack victim which I am sure we have discussed before has similar hair amd eyebrows to the identicate picture behind.

yes that's one of them

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[GreyCrow]

Ah just found this post of yours which hopefully will help me

It wont. Its a pile of nonsense.

If anyone had worked out a pattern they would find SS and help the family find peace

Instead they litter the internet with their rubbish