Current Claremont Murders Discussion & Edwards trial updates pt4 - Beyond the Verdict

[Kurve]

Here is
- Claremont Murders - Part One and Part Two and Part 3
- Media
- The Bunker

• Hey Bret? Stalking Claremont the book.
• Justice Hall's Decision 619 pgs

 

[CaseyJones]

The Neerabup connection for me comes from something that happened in the early days of CSK, not long after CG was found. Just a set of circumstances that made me suspicious. Then there were bones/remains found in the bush out near Neerabup in 2021 and I have not seen any reports on the forensics of what/who was found yet. That has raised more suspicions for me but until I have results from that find I am not willing to say much more on that.

Very interesting, especially from 1997, odd how nothing more has been released on the neerabup remains. Can you give me the month in the year you are referring to ?

 

[metic]

Drphibes was not a macro detective.
not even allowed to mention the name on here, it was banned

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[Krusty Crab]

Circle on SLD, where the two lines cross from the gpo and JR's position. This is where 9, in pic 2, crosses the line from the GPO, 15 to the prior victim, 14.
Same scenario, circle on 14, date prior 9, date after 15. You have 9, 14, 15. 14 point to the next victim ( ciara ), 15 back to the GPO and 9 back to itself ( jane ).

so your saying sarah lee davey is somewhere in Freo harbour? didnt she go missing in broome?

 

[CaseyJones]

Drphibes was not a macro detective.
not even allowed to mention the name on here, it was banned

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

so your saying sarah lee davey is somewhere in Freo harbour? didnt she go missing in broome?

 

[CaseyJones]

so your saying sarah lee davey is somewhere in Freo harbour? didnt she go missing in broome?

 

[CaseyJones]

If you zoom in, its clearly about 5k off freo harbour. How do you come up with 'in freo harbour'. There are no rules to say that a body can not be transported over a long distance, as i described in a much earlier post.
Look at how exact the pattern is, therefore what it is telling you, not me telling you. It can not be wrong. Other members posts also tell you the connection bradley has to broome.

 

[CaseyJones]

I do respect the general do's and dont's, though i was'nt aware that he's not to be mentioned.

 

[CaseyJones]

It's good to see that no one can refute anything in the video. Of the thousand or so crackpot theories over the years, i know that this is 'The One'. There had to be one out of a thousand. Going by the lack of comments my guess is that people realise it is an actual legitimate thing.

 

[Kurve]

I do respect the general do's and dont's, though i was'nt aware that he's not to be mentioned.

Phibes drops in here now and then. Still around.

 

[jason_recliner]

A video has been uploaded to Youtube detailing the pattern. Too big to put on here.There will be another part soon as there is more to come, which details what happens when the circle is flipped anticlockwise.

OK, I see it now. It's not that the murderer has used a pattern, it's somebody later trying to assign a pattern to random occurrences. Don't take this the wrong way. If you can't go to the 'location' and find SS you're wrong.

 

[Kurve]

Drphibes was not a macro detective.
not even allowed to mention the name on here, it was banned

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

You mean Phibes was banned from discussion in the main thread when the trial was underway? We were okay to discuss it in The Bunker but since the trial ended and we have this new thread here, it should be okay. Unless I move this in to The Bunker with the history.

That might be a good idea?

 

[Kurve]

In pic 1, the 9th points to the previous victim, sarah 27th. Pic 2, 27 runs north across the 9th, where they cross is sarah's location.

Have you factored the disappearance of Julie Cutler in? I can't see it in there but I'm not across this fully.

 

[CaseyJones]

OK, I see it now. It's not that the murderer has used a pattern, it's somebody later trying to assign a pattern to random occurrences. Don't take this the wrong way. If you can't go to the 'location' and find SS you're wrong.

I see your point, but the given location is a suburban address, which would require the owners consent and research to know where to start digging. Research regarding any add-ons to the property, which were built around the time of sarah's disappearance. Given what i have presented in the video, it's a wrong call to say that it's wrong because sarah has not been found from my point of view. Sarah lee Davey and peta webber are not random occurences.
The circle on the GPO shows their dates and janes, pointing to two bodies and BRE's house. Each of those dates has a 1 in 364 chance of missing the mark. The 9th has 364 chances not to line up with his house. The 14th has 364 chances not to line up with janes body. The 22nd has 364 chances not to line up with ciara's body.

 

[CaseyJones]

Phibes drops in here now and then. Still around.

Keeping up appearances !

 

[CaseyJones]

Have you factored the disappearance of Julie Cutler in? I can't see it in there but I'm not across this fully.

Yes i have, being able to workout dates before SS, resulting in about 10 prior to 1996, her date was'nt one of them.
I think he started this pattern with Sarah Spiers, but he probably started killing before her, not using a pattern. Other clues form the opinion that he killed Kerry Turner, the main one being that they are so close to the same distance, in a straight line, from the GPO.

 

[Kurve]

Yes i have, being able to workout dates before SS, resulting in about 10 prior to 1996, her date was'nt one of them.
I think he started this pattern with Sarah Spiers, but he probably started killing before her, not using a pattern. Other clues form the opinion that he killed Kerry Turner, the main one being that they are so close to the same distance, in a straight line, from the GPO.

Had you seen this old article?

 

[CaseyJones]

Had you seen this old article?

View attachment 1539102

Yes but it did'nt seem to be worth going further with it. It does have 12 segments with a C in the middle, 12 months of the year ? Worth another look.

 

[metic]

I do respect the general do's and dont's, though i was'nt aware that he's not to be mentioned.

It is detrimental to your credibility to mention dr phibes. most people will think your a crackpot , to come on here with your map, there's been many crackpot nutcases before you doing similar stuff.

Just listened to a podcast few days ago suggesting Richard Dorrough killed Sara Lee Davey at the end of a jetty in Broome and disposed of her in the water.

I catch killers - Gary Jubelin:

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[metic]

You mean Phibes was banned from discussion in the main thread when the trial was underway? We were okay to discuss it in The Bunker but since the trial ended and we have this new thread here, it should be okay. Unless I move this in to The Bunker with the history.

That might be a good idea?

There was a time when it was banned (somewhere) and you could get a "time out" for saying the word dr phibes, certainly comment deletion. it maybe that was on another sleuthing site and not this site ?? I maybe wrong, I have a good memory and know that there was risk involved in mentioning the name. Anyways if you don't mind; moderator kurve , allow us to say; phibes was not a macro detective, many devout claremont sleuths believe we know who he is and have communicated with him, he's still around but his name has changed 10 times or more since the original drP. He has explained himself and I do believe he was trying to lure out the csk with his attention seeking style of spooky commentary. I suggest if you want people to take you seriously don't try this; "phibes was a macro detective" BS !
Casey Jones is it you who is speaking on the YouTube video?

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

 

[BFew]

Way back during the phil hughes blog " Has a Serial Killer Blogged Here " was active

Gary Hughes.
Not Phil Hughes.

http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com...mments/has_a_serial_killer_blogged_here/desc/ (original url)
(It's archived 12 times between 7 June 2007 and and 2nd Oct 2016 at Wayback Machine)

A similar year earlier? Gary Hughes blog mentioning a Dr Phibes, is also archived extensively on that archive site.
http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com...tralian/comments/uk_link_in_wa_serial_murders (original url)

 

[CaseyJones]

It is detrimental to your credibility to mention dr phibes. most people will think your a crackpot , to come on here with your map, there's been many crackpot nutcases before you doing similar stuff.

Just listened to a podcast few days ago suggesting Richard Dorrough killed Sara Lee Davey at the end of a jetty in Broome and disposed of her in the water.

I catch killers - Gary Jubelin:

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

The difference in all those crackpot theories is that every aspect of this pattern, points to the bodies and his house and the proof is in the video. Come up with your own evidence that will disprove how it does not work and before you do, dont forget part 2 .

 

[BFew]

The difference in all those crackpot theories is that every aspect of this pattern, points to the bodies and his house and the proof is in the video. Come up with your own evidence that will disprove how it does not work and before you do, dont forget part 2 .

I've got a fundamental problem with this unscientific, guilty until proven innocent approach.

 

[CaseyJones]

There was a time when it was banned (somewhere) and you could get a "time out" for saying the word dr phibes, certainly comment deletion. it maybe that was on another sleuthing site and not this site ?? I maybe wrong, I have a good memory and know that there was risk involved in mentioning the name. Anyways if you don't mind; moderator kurve , allow us to say; phibes was not a macro detective, many devout claremont sleuths believe we know who he is and have communicated with him, he's still around but his name has changed 10 times or more since the original drP. He has explained himself and I do believe he was trying to lure out the csk with his attention seeking style of spooky commentary. I suggest if you want people to take you seriously don't try this; "phibes was a macro detective" BS !
Casey Jones is it you who is speaking on the YouTube video?

Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk

It is me talking. I picked up on a verbal mistake or two. I said it was my 'opinion' that he was a macro detective. Forget about him, back to the the video hey ?

 

[CaseyJones]

I've got a fundamental problem with this unscientific, guilty until proven innocent approach.

We know you've got problems, but what is the pattern revealing to you ? Even though he is dead, was'nt dorrough guilty until proven innocent ? And still is.

 

[CaseyJones]

Why are we not debating the pattern in the video. Dancing around posting about irrelevant stuff. No one can shoot it down and there are too many big ego's here to admit that it's all there. It is a fact that the pattern works perfectly and there has not been one positive comment.