Yea you only get shots fired at auskick clinics and beaten to death by bouncers in Melbourne.
Yes, but they don't use sparklers, and you won't end up in a barrel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea you only get shots fired at auskick clinics and beaten to death by bouncers in Melbourne.
Because it is a woman. Don't turn this in to some sexist thing (clearly you are pushing it in that direction). I'm all for equality but if a bloke acts like that around a woman it will always be worse. It should always be seen that way too.Why would it be a 'poorer' reflection on him if he acted the same way though?
Because it is a woman. Don't turn this in to some sexist thing (clearly you are pushing it in that direction). I'm all for equality but if a bloke acts like that around a woman it will always be worse. It should always be seen that way too.
Because you're an idiot if you think it's exactly the same if you replaced Clarkson with a woman (I said it's never be okay for either sex to retaliate). It is a poorer reflection on the drunk if it's a woman. Males are physically stronger than women (50% stronger in brute strength), therefore you are dealing with an imbalance (let alone the higher incidence of domestic abuse and sexual assault). Society will always think it's worse...deal with it. I don't think it should ever change in that scenario.Why shouldn't I push that angle? Because it actually is sexist and you don't like that?
Because you're an idiot if you think it's exactly the same if you replaced Clarkson with a woman (I said it's never be okay for either sex to retaliate). It is a poorer reflection on the drunk if it's a woman. Males are physically stronger than women (50% stronger in brute strength), therefore you are dealing with an imbalance (let alone the higher incidence of domestic abuse and sexual assault). Society will always think it's worse...deal with it. I don't think it should ever change in that scenario.
Highlighting the point by selecting a larger than average female (a cricketer) only further proves my point.
It's still male vs female. Higher incidence of sexual assault and domestic disturbance. Until that evens up society will always view it as a poorer reflection.I used her as an example because you cited that Clarko was a "physically fit" ex-footballer and therefore should be less intimidated. Elyse Perry is an elite athlete, so by your logic, it would be sexist to suggest it would be worse for the drunk to get in her face. She falls outside this "imbalance."
It's still male vs female. Higher incidence of sexual assault and domestic disturbance. Until that evens up society will always view it as a poorer reflection.
Were you bullied by girls at school starburns?
You're the one trying to twist it starburns. It went down that route after you asked why it's different. Now you want to go back to the original context. You are thick if you think the whole scenario wouldn't have played out differently if it was a woman and not Clarkson.And what does that have to do with the context of the Clarko abuse? He was copping that over the result of a football game, is it worse for a female in that situation if the context is the same? It's got nothing to do with sexual assault in that context.
And no.
I used her as an example because you cited that Clarko was a "physically fit" ex-footballer and therefore should be less intimidated. Elyse Perry is an elite athlete, so by your logic, it would be sexist to suggest it would be worse for the drunk to get in her face. She falls outside this "imbalance."
The surprising thing was he actualy hit him while the bloke could see him. I thought sniping from behind was more his style
My little nephew just ran in saying he was gonna punch someone like Clarko.
Look what you started Clarko, my nephew thinks he's just like you, because you're both the same size.
It's still male vs female. Higher incidence of sexual assault and domestic disturbance. Until that evens up society will always view it as a poorer reflection.
Were you bullied by girls at school starburns?
Lucky Bickleys elbow wasn't a mitigating factorWhat a ****in moron.
Clarko should have belted him harder.
Just heard on SEN he hooked a Port Supporter last night WTF? Time to stand down angry little Garden Gnome
Now we know why Tasmania plays unsociable football, comes from the top
#kulcha
Shouldn't you be jumping off a jetty with your coach?Lucky Bickleys elbow wasn't a mitigating factor
Agree with your last two sentences.Clarko should've hit him harder. Can't believe the little sook has made a complaint. Hopefully Kochie has the nuts to ban him from PA games.