Collingwood board podcast

[Cousin of Daicos]

I'd be happy to do the odd guest spot if asked. Could be cool.

 

[Swooop]

Sounds a great idea

Old Spice and The Sherriff have experience and expertise in this very thing and would be excellent and entertaining.

Count me out, as although I've got the perfect head (for radio) got a voice better suited for the library

So many most worthy candidates already, like the idea of a regular panel of say up to four with perhaps two guests a
week?

Great idea 76

 

[Primetime Pricey]

would love to be involved, my voice is made for radio..... if you like guys who sound like jockeys

 

[DThomas]

Sounds Awsome.

Want a Dave's Rant and Rave Segment

Make this happen!!!

 

[mike_]

Sounds Awsome.

Want a Dave's Rant and Rave Segment

I can see it now

The TradeDraft Tirade proudly presented by Twisties

 

[vjknight]

I can see it now

The TradeDraft Tirade proudly presented by Twisties

if he gets sponsored by durex ................

nah just too nasty to contemplate

 

[76woodenspooners]

How has Dave not gone viral yet? I'm waiting for the time when I can say "I knew him when..."

The wheels are now in motion ...

 

[Rusty22]

when are we starting all this?
How would it be done?
What times would it be done?
a lot of thnking to do..

 

[Swooop]

Could see a bidding war erupt between Twisties and Durex Senior Executive Managers, though they'd have to be concerned re the bid from the other keen consortiums.

TradeDraft's "Blow your Top" segment, proudly brought to you by Rheem showers and the Kleenex company

 

[Old Spice]

i could put up with TradeDraft "shutup dog" but im a bit wary of other noises making the podcast.

no point getting mattys123 involved, as he'd go off in a different direction discussing 463 other sports.

Remember Dave's commentary over games? Magnificent!

 

[TheFreshBanana]

Sounds a great idea
So many most worthy candidates already, like the idea of a regular panel of say up to four with perhaps two guests a
week?

Great idea 76

I think a total of 6 people would be a bit much to control and make sure no one is talking over eachother, especially starting out.

I'd say a panel of 4 would be a good balance.

 

[jefffff34]

Have done multimedia at tertiary level and have commentated on community radio for the Northern League.

See this as another string to the bow, and would love the chance to knock this out.

 

[Markfs]

Definitely should be done. Collingwood needs to be at the forefront of using new technology. I agree that there should be a limited number of regulars who might be the favourite posters of the forum. The problem is to get people who are good talking....as opposed to writing. Someone needs to take control and probably audition anyone who wants to be on the panel..... Radio experience would be useful....Good luck with it.

 

[tazzawazza]

Yes woodenspoon sounds great, make it happen please.

 

[biggiemediums]

I'd be down. I used to do a podcast on Sherdog for MMA news and I love Collingwood more than anything (sorry wifey.)

 

[Old Spice]

Defs down. And there is obviously a lot of people wanting to do it.

A suggestion, perhaps we can have a segment where a couple of peeps commentate over a small set piece of play. Someone who has the IT nous to overlay audio on vision (probably everyone but me) can be our tech person. That could be funny or it could go down like a steaming pile of poo. But it might involve 8 say instead of 4: 4 to do podcast and 4 to do the commentary over a set play.

You might also have a brief segment from a group of fantasy footy experts.

 

[blaze036]

Give dave a 5 min segment where he can discuss his random thoughts and give us a level headed assessment of the umpires and why Hudson should not play next week

 

[TheFreshBanana]

A suggestion, perhaps we can have a segment where a couple of peeps commentate over a small set piece of play. Someone who has the IT nous to overlay audio on vision (probably everyone but me) can be our tech person. That could be funny or it could go down like a steaming pile of poo. But it might involve 8 say instead of 4: 4 to do podcast and 4 to do the commentary over a set play.

You might also have a brief segment from a group of fantasy footy experts.

I don't get it. Wouldn't it basically be commentary over commentary?

But like the idea of the fantasy segment.

I reckon it should be done by 2 podcasts a week, 20 minutes each, on Monday and Thursday

There are a few reasons for this

1. Because so many people seem interested, you can include more people regularly, but also by having a regular panel for each podcast.
2. Podcasts can end up being a commitment, if done regularly, and the success to any podcast is to make sure it's done consistently and with the people who are happy to do it week in week out. Making it 20 minutes is a perfect time limit imo, it's not too long and not too short. 20 minutes also makes it less of a hassle to the panel.
3. Having 2 different shows can tackle different main topics. A Monday show can do a post game review (Tuesday if it's a Monday game), and a Thursday show is able to look at the team sheet and do a pre-game discussion.
4. With these 2 varying shows, it can also play to the person's strength. If their more suitable dissecting a game, they could be put on the Monday show, if they're better at talking about the game leading up to it, they could do the Thursday show.

The main problem is to find ways to meet that 15-20 minute quota. But I think if you have certain segments each week, bring in guests with their own unique segments (sort of as an audition), then that quota could easily be met.

Food for thought.

 

[tazzawazza]

Give dave a 5 min segment where he can discuss his random thoughts and give us a level headed assessment of the umpires and why Hudson should not play next week

I wouldn't mind listening to Dave the whole podcast, he knows his footy well.

 

[Syphoncom]

I did a podcast for a season with a mate on iTunes. Was heaps of fun, don't see why it wouldn't work for here.

 

[the mighty T]

I like the idea of two segments a week: Review and Preview

Panel of 4 seems logical, with 2 hosts and perhaps 2 guest commentators a week?

 

[Old Spice]

I don't get it. Wouldn't it basically be commentary over commentary?

But like the idea of the fantasy segment.

I reckon it should be done by 2 podcasts a week, 20 minutes each, on Monday and Thursday

There are a few reasons for this

1. Because so many people seem interested, you can include more people regularly, but also by having a regular panel for each podcast.
2. Podcasts can end up being a commitment, if done regularly, and the success to any podcast is to make sure it's done consistently and with the people who are happy to do it week in week out. Making it 20 minutes is a perfect time limit imo, it's not too long and not too short. 20 minutes also makes it less of a hassle to the panel.
3. Having 2 different shows can tackle different main topics. A Monday show can do a post game review (Tuesday if it's a Monday game), and a Thursday show is able to look at the team sheet and do a pre-game discussion.
4. With these 2 varying shows, it can also play to the person's strength. If their more suitable dissecting a game, they could be put on the Monday show, if they're better at talking about the game leading up to it, they could do the Thursday show.

The main problem is to find ways to meet that 15-20 minute quota. But I think if you have certain segments each week, bring in guests with their own unique segments (sort of as an audition), then that quota could easily be met.


Food for thought.

You would grab some fox/7 vision, then mute those commentators and dub our commentary team over the top, peppered with Dave saying magnificent!

 

[TradeDraft]

I might not have a face for radio, but I certainly have the voice for it

I think that be the Majority of Us

 

[TradeDraft]

Remember Dave's commentary over games? Magnificent!

These Ones:

 

[TradeDraft]

I could also help with Making a Youtube Channel for the Podcast