News Collingwood News & Media

Remove this Banner Ad

The issue with that is it gets back to the reason why they moved away from the medical sub - fake injuries.

I'm not sure I understand why

If they can use the sub tactically, then get an injury, if they can bring that tactical sub back into the game and replace them with an injured player, why would that lead to fake injuries like before?

They don't need to fake it because they can still tactically sub
 
I'm not sure I understand why

If they can use the sub tactically, then get an injury, if they can bring that tactical sub back into the game and replace them with an injured player, why would that lead to fake injuries like before?

They don't need to fake it because they can still tactically sub
If you could bring the subbed player back for an injury, they'd probably do some early tactical subs - later in the game with a different scoreboard, they would sometimes want to tactically sub again.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If you could bring the subbed player back for an injury, they'd probably do some early tactical subs - later in the game with a different scoreboard, they would sometimes want to tactically sub again.

Yeah I guess so, didn't think of that

er der
 
If you could bring the subbed player back for an injury, they'd probably do some early tactical subs - later in the game with a different scoreboard, they would sometimes want to tactically sub again.
Easy way to curtail this is that if you want to bring your subbed out player back on the field, the player he's replacing cannot play the following week - If it's supposed to be used for injury/concussion, then that shouldn't be an issue anyway.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

News Collingwood News & Media

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top