76woodenspooners
Brownlow Medallist
so Cleaver settled. What a laugh.
It was us (Browne) who said that they wouldn’t settle and intended to see it all the way through to judgement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
so Cleaver settled. What a laugh.
I mean, what was he going to say? "We're going to settle no matter how much it costs!"It was us (Browne) who said that they wouldn’t settle and intended to see it all the way through to judgement.
Maybe it was settled for zero $ and no counter suit from us for damaged reputation for fause claims?It was us (Browne) who said that they wouldn’t settle and intended to see it all the way through to judgement.
I mean, what was he going to say? "We're going to settle no matter how much it costs!"
Wrong. Browne's public stance was the standard response from a defendant with deep pockets.He could have said what most people say in these situations …
…. nothing.
Wrong. Browne's public stance was the standard response from a defendant with deep pockets.
It is not mouthing off to say a matter will be vigorously defended. I'd say a dumb one is someone making that kind of an assessment of what is the most basic of litigation tactics.I’ll happily defer to your greater experience on this stuff …
… but in my own experience the dumb ones mouth off and the smart ones keep their mouth shut.
It is not mouthing off to say a matter will be vigorously defended. I'd say a dumb one is someone making that kind of an assessment of what is the most basic of litigation tactics.
Probably said to him "If you take this to court and lose, it will cost you a lot of money".Wrong. Browne's public stance was the standard response from a defendant with deep pockets.
I get that Browne’s public statements would have been cleared through counsel first …
… but don’t you think it’s wiser for the client to just STFU and let counsel do their job?
Well Michael Warner wrote it, so we shouldn't expect anything much.The incorrect spelling of dismissal in the headline is giving me 'fake news' vibes.
Well Michael Warner wrote it, so we shouldn't expect anything much.
Well Michael Warner wrote it, so we shouldn't expect anything much.
If you take a matter to court, both parties lose. Given we'd be unlikely to either: get costs awarded (even if we won), or even if they were awarded, costs recovered, it's likely we offered an amount substantially less than what it would have cost us to progress the matter - always good to remember that we have a legal system, and not a justice system.Probably said to him "If you take this to court and lose, it will cost you a lot of money".
We won't know the details, but it could have been something like that.
Michael Warner is ok - he is one of the few in the media that IS NOT a lap dog of the AFL
Probably said to him "If you take this to court and lose, it will cost you a lot of money".
We won't know the details, but it could have been something like that.
Good. Get away from playing them at the Marvel shithole for onceWe will play the dogs round 2 at the G
THE CENTENARY BULLDOGS
ROUND: 2
OPPONENT: Collingwood
VENUE: MCG
DATE: Friday 21 March
TIME: 7.40pm AEDT
Good. Get away from playing them at the Marvel shithole for once
Round 4 v Carlton
Round 9 v Freo