Apex36
Hall of Famer
- Mar 26, 2014
- 41,011
- 88,190
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Ok, but can you at least try and be realistic?Can you stop trying to be confrontational? it's superficial, transparent and reeks of insecurity
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ok, but can you at least try and be realistic?Can you stop trying to be confrontational? it's superficial, transparent and reeks of insecurity
If the intent is to clear his contract to bring in others, then I’d be expecting to get back something that will help get the deal done for others- eg a second rounder to add to TarantoI’m not so sure. It’s the contract they want gone. If it meant the books we cleared fully, we wouldn’t get a first
And you would be wrong.
Yeah he’s deceptively short for a key forward. Makes up for it with gogo gadget arms and freakish athletic ability.
I like what you are saying and it would be a better option generally. But would St Kilda still be willing to trade for DeGoey if their first pick is 8-10 and the trade cost them that pick? Same with Geelong although their pick would be closer to about 16-20 and we might get a better pick from free agency anyway. Im not sure if clubs would be willing to take a risk on DeGoey if he cost a 1st + a big contract. Im all for trading or even keeping DeGoey if his contract is small and won't get us a first round selection. But if we can't get St Kilda for example to come to the table and the contract is a big one and gets us a 1st (lets say pick 14) then I am happy to take that give Brisbane a few 3rd rounders for Ashcroft and move on. As to those who think we can get a 1st rounder from Brisbane for our 3 X 3rd rounders. Brisbane will have much better deals available for their 1st. So I don't mind getting rid of a few picks in the 40's. Its not the best deal but a fair compromise if it is necessary.We’d be better off if we took McStay as a FA, traded out DeGoey for a first, and then traded our 3rds to Brisbane for their McStay compo pick.
Peter Wright.
I don't think it would bother Brisbane especially if they were getting more points for Ashcroft. Its much of a muchness.Dont think they will if they get Band 2 compensation which people are saying is likely. Our 3 third rounders is just over the points of what that compo pick is worth
If the intent is to clear his contract to bring in others, then I’d be expecting to get back something that will help get the deal done for others- eg a second rounder to add to Taranto
I've watched you do it to a few others and if you could see yourself you'd die of embarrassment, how many years have you wasted trying to get people to argue with you? sadOk, but can you at least try and be realistic?
Ugle-Hagan was 195 when drafted, he’s apparently 197 now but looks no taller than Naughton live. Logan McDonald is 196.
Why have you shifted the goal posts on this too? Your original statement was all the true key forwards are over 200cm. Now you’ve dropped back the requirement by 5cm? Did you think nobody would notice?
The only logical conclusion to the news that the club is sounding out the likes of Geelong and StKilda that I can come to is that they’re looking to see what they could get in a trade. Much in the same vein of Danger to Geelong, they’re saying they’ll match offers to force a trade and getting on the front foot.I like what you are saying and it would be a better option generally. But would St Kilda still be willing to trade for DeGoey if their first pick is 8-10 and the trade cost them that pick?
The only club I can see who’s genuinely in a better position to trade with Brisbane than we are is GC. And they may well trade their first with them. But if that happens and they have an end of first round compo selection, we’ll be in an excellent position to trade for that with our thirds.Same with Geelong although their pick would be closer to about 16-20 and we might get a better pick from free agency anyway. Im not sure if clubs would be willing to take a risk on DeGoey if he cost a 1st + a big contract. Im all for trading or even keeping DeGoey if his contract is small and won't get us a first round selection. But if we can't get St Kilda for example to come to the table and the contract is a big one and gets us a 1st (lets say pick 14) then I am happy to take that give Brisbane a few 3rd rounders for Ashcroft and move on. As to those who think we can get a 1st rounder from Brisbane for our 3 X 3rd rounders. Brisbane will have much better deals available for their 1st. So I don't mind getting rid of a few picks in the 40's. Its not the best deal but a fair compromise if it is necessary.
If you could try and be realistic you could have avoided these melts. Do you think you could try it?I've watched you do it to a few others and if you could see yourself you'd die of embarrassment, how many years have you wasted trying to get people to argue with you? sad
Except he’s not. He’s never measured in that tall, and Carlton have no reason to fudge his measurements to make him smaller.
Jack Darling is 191cm
Josh Kennedy is 194cm
Oscar Allen is 194cm
Charlie Curnow is 192cm
Tex Walker is 194cm
Jeremy Cameron is 196cm
Jack Gunston is 193cm
Tom McDonald is 195cm
Aaron Naughton is 195cm
Have known the lad since he was a toddler and he's ridden my boards so I'm thinking I may have some inkling to his size?
a mate has surfed with him and his brothers and said he is a big unit.
Picks I would prefer rather then our current picks at 42, 46, 47 = 1042 pointsThe only club I can see who’s genuinely in a better position to trade with Brisbane than we are is GC. And they may well trade their first with them. But if that happens and they have an end of first round compo selection, we’ll be in an excellent position to trade for that with our thirds.
that wasn't deliberate. when 192cm was referenced I came down in height.
Chris Scott was talking about 2002 Brisbane vs 2022 Geelong and he said 2022 Geelong would win because of the difference in size and he referenced Dekonning who is a 204cm full back.
The side that won 3 premierships vs a side that has won nothing. Let me think on that one.that wasn't deliberate. when 192cm was referenced I came down in height.
Chris Scott was talking about 2002 Brisbane vs 2022 Geelong and he said 2022 Geelong would win because of the difference in size and he referenced Dekonning who is a 204cm full back.
Can you please explain to us all why hes never measured in taller than 192? I mean, it’s not that I don’t trust you, but Carlton have no reason to fudge his height, and going by the eye test on TV he definitely looks around the same height or a little shorter than Silvagni, who is 194…Have known the lad since he was a toddler and he's ridden my boards so I'm thinking I may have some inkling to his size?
The side that won 3 premierships vs a side that has won nothing. Let me think on that one.
Yep!If we trade him we aren’t letting him go for picks exchange
A first rounder will need to be involved …it’s not 2020 this time round
McStay ~$500K + Taranto ~$600K + Logue ~$500K = ~$1.6MTake McStay as UFA
De Goey and F2 to St Kilda for 9 and 45
Trade 42, 45, 46, 47 to Brisbane for 16
14 to GWS for Taranto
16 to Fremantle for Logue
Take 9 and a 5th rounder to the draft
In: Taranto, Logue, McStay, 9
Out: De Goey, 14, 42, 46, 47, F2